Children In need

Posted by: JamieWednesday on 18 November 2011

Is it just me who gets more emotional as I get older over the years when watching the 'In Need' clips...

Posted on: 18 November 2011 by deadlifter

It gets me as well now mate especially as i now have the little Tiger, so reminds me how lucky i really am

 

 

         

Posted on: 18 November 2011 by Tony Lockhart
I'm watching Children In Need. Or, as Madonna likes to call it, The Shopping Channel.
Posted on: 18 November 2011 by deadlifter

Ooh,  Red card your barred.    

Posted on: 18 November 2011 by winkyincanada
Originally Posted by deadlifter:

Ooh,  Red card your barred.    

you're

Posted on: 18 November 2011 by deadlifter

I stand corrected sir.......

Posted on: 18 November 2011 by winkyincanada
Originally Posted by deadlifter:

I stand corrected sir.......

Posted on: 21 November 2011 by maze
I protest at having this forced on us every year,it seems to go on and on,on,on etc,etc boring.
Posted on: 21 November 2011 by BigH47

maze , do you not have control of your own TV then?  I just don't watch simplez!

Posted on: 21 November 2011 by maze
Yes I do, however I would appreciate refund on my licence fee due to losing a whole evenings viewing due to a whole channel taken over with drivel. While I agree the original concept was a good idea, year on year it get more rammed down our throats not just for one evening but for the whole week and the BBC is still bleating on about it today.
Typical BBC left wing rhetoric as usual, social engineering and thinking, dependancy creates more dependancy.
Posted on: 22 November 2011 by deadlifter

There are hundreds of channels to choose from so why bitch and moan about one and for once a year, you could even have used the excuse to go down the pub and at least the money raised is spent in the UK. i suppose you begrudge the rememberance programe as well. I don`t know you but it strikes me that you are a miserable git, but the chances are i`m completely wrong and i hope so.

Posted on: 22 November 2011 by maze
You are so right, you don't know me. I am all for good causes, however I don't see why I have to be subjected to this dire drivel year on year and to be made to feel guilty that I don't follow all the other sheep, baaaa.
As for remembrance day I fully endorse honouring our brave soldeirs past and present and all that have lost their lives in wars.
There is no real poverty in this great nation of ours, yes povery exists in many other parts of the world, but please don't insult my intelligence to say that poverty is rife in this country. What we do have are people that neglect their children problaby due our welfare state. Someone will bail me out attitude. Why is it year on year after all the giving nothing ever changes?
What improves people's lives is empowering people to take responsibility for them selves. Money does solve problems alone.
Posted on: 22 November 2011 by George Fredrik

Dear maze,

 

Are you suggesting that there are diserving and undiserving poor?

 

ATB from George

Posted on: 22 November 2011 by Tony Lockhart
Oh come on, Maze,

Some poor little buggers are born with massive problems into unfortunate families. Just book yourself on a holiday next year. It sounds like you need it.

Tony
Posted on: 22 November 2011 by maze
Would these be the same unfortunate families with the wide screen tv's and mobile phones and fags and booze?
Posted on: 22 November 2011 by Tony Lockhart
Oh dear. Seen many ghosts at night recently?

Tony
Posted on: 23 November 2011 by maze
Ha ha that was nearly a joke.
How about every other year a senior citizen in need appeal? We treat our elder folk appallingly in this country me thinks. I may be more inclined towards the annual tired dire children in need effort. We are too young person centred in this country and the BBC have already been brought to book over this issue.
Posted on: 23 November 2011 by BigH47

I'll vote for the Senior citizen in need appeal. 

My need is a NAC 52, thanks.

Posted on: 23 November 2011 by Gale 401

I had a read of this thread late last night.

Maze,

You need to open your eyes man.

I have seen first hand what children in need has done over the last 30 years.

I have seen what its done for children.

You might be a ok bloke in real life but i would give you a smack for your above posts on this thread.

You have not got a clue

.How much good its done over the years.

Any time you want a day out?

Come down to Hythe in Kent and i will take you to some special schools that would not be here if it was not for children in need.

I will take you to meet some of the familys that its helped, four are good friends and dont have their sons and daughters anymore.They died before they were 10 years old..

I still have my original Pud mug my son and daughters are long gone.

One day a year and it lasts with thank you's for another week or so on BBC Radio.

****, IF thats the price we have to pay for the good it does?

SHOOT ME NOW.

Stu

Posted on: 23 November 2011 by maze
Stu you really need to get a grip. Smacking people around is not how we debate in this country. Forgive me I thought forums were for us to put our points across, we may not all agree,it's why we are a democracy (term used loosely).
Perhaps you need to read my first post on the matter, I said in principal children in need I agree with, it 's just that dire programme I object to.
Interesting no comments made regarding how we treat our elder folk, just cements my thoughts that we are too youth focused in th uk. You will be old too one day, maybe you already are?
I have not had life easy. Born to a one parent family, late teens spent homeless and jobless, jobless several times actually, no money , no future. What  these experiences did give me was A sense of sorting out my own difficulties in life.
Now children or anyone for that matter with medical conditions is a different kettle of fish I am am the first to put my hand in my pocket.
I have spent several years as a volunteer, which I believe offers me insight into what I am talking about. I know life's hard, families have tough times.
Let's not forget the BBC children in need is as much about the BBC promoting them and their presenters as much as it is about raising funds.
Posted on: 24 November 2011 by BigH47

maze to come a little to Stus defence your 1st post did seem to be anti CIN, rather than anti BBC.

I agree with you the programme stinks, we used to watch every year then just record hi-lights now we don't even bother.

 

We give to charity through the wife's school and church.

As an aside the kids at Sally's school get great benefit from making cake and such like and learning about some of the projects that CIN do around the world. 

 

Do you object to Branson getting his mug on the news  at every opportunity?  BBC is a business and needs to spread the word, it's not only the UK that sees this programme or the BBC in general.

So there is more to it than a annual programme.

Posted on: 24 November 2011 by Guido Fawkes

> I agree with you the programme stinks

 

+1 

 

The charity aspect is fine, but I'd be happy to give more if they promised not to have TW and cronies on the telly

 

Of course, people should help children and others in need, but ... 


A million housewives every day
Pick up a can of beans and say:
“What an amazing example of synchronisation”


He looked out of the aeroplane
And he saw the Alps way down below
He fixed his gaze on the white terrain
And he could see a portrait in the snow
And he shouted: “Hey look down there, I can see Robert Powell”
That’s an ominous example of the power of TV


from Venus in Flares 




Posted on: 24 November 2011 by Gale 401

Maze,

You are to much man.

The Smack was a reff to what people do to there children.

IE Smack bottoms/Legs..

Do you have any children?

If you do?  I hope they are well and you never need any help.

Stu

 

Posted on: 26 November 2011 by Harry
Originally Posted by maze:
in principal children in need I agree with, it 's just that dire programme I object to.
Let's not forget the BBC children in need is as much about the BBC promoting them and their presenters as much as it is about raising funds.

Got it in two. The coverage and emphasis is diabolical. Similar sentiment here to Band Aid. Affluent people to an entertainment event to save the world and spend months boasting about how much they forked up. If that's what it takes to make some people indulge in an act of charity then so be it. Not in my world.

Posted on: 26 November 2011 by Bruce Woodhouse
Whatever the merits or otherwise of CiN ( I have never watched it), my experience is not in agreement with Harry. As the Trustee of a charity that raised over £150,000 I would say that the most significant generosity was always those that could probably least afford it. We did have affluent donors but most were very straightforward 'ordinary' folk who just belived in supporting the charity and motivated by pure altruism. I would not be surprised if that was also true for CiN.

Our largest corporate and personal donors also chose to be anonymous, rather than 'crowing' about it.

Bruce
Posted on: 26 November 2011 by Harry

Bruce - I don't think I put appropriate emphasis on "affluent". We are comparatively an incredibly affluent society. there's poor and then there's real poverty. By comparison, the least well off in UK society can be classified as poor little rich kids. Unless we keep the national blinkers on.