Facebook Loathing

Posted by: GraemeH on 08 January 2012

Am I alone I wonder in loathing the interface and accessibility of Facebook?.  I absolutely detest its visual noise and tittle tattle commentary.  Must be an age thing.  G
Posted on: 08 January 2012 by BigH47

Why don't you post your views on Facebook?

 

It is one of the shittiest websites out there I agree.

Posted on: 08 January 2012 by Jono 13

My nippers are banned from it as it is toss.

 

Jono

 

(The king of well reasoned arguments)

Posted on: 08 January 2012 by Exiled Highlander

Facebook is shit and rock 'n roll is the work of the devil.  You are all getting old!

Posted on: 08 January 2012 by GraemeH
Good Rock n' Roll is indeed, thank God, the work of the Devil.  Facebook is clearly the work of a much lesser entity!  G
Posted on: 09 January 2012 by Exiled Highlander

Fair point Graeme!

Posted on: 09 January 2012 by The Hawk

I used to loath it, but I've come to enjoy interacting with old friends using it. I don't like the latest style they've created.

 

Dave

Posted on: 09 January 2012 by Dungassin

I'm on Facebook ONLY because my kids post piccies/videos etc of my grandkids there, ditto my nieces and nephews.  You just have to check occasionally that FB hasn't decided to change its privacy options yet again.  Even SWMBO uses it.

Posted on: 10 January 2012 by Mike Hughes
Facebook is for staying in touch with people you know. Twitter is for meeting people you don't. Neither site has an attractive interface. On balance - always Twitter.
Posted on: 12 January 2012 by J.N.

I tried it for a while and didn't like it. I guess it's okay for swift comments by busy people, but it seemed indicative of the general dumbing-down of literary abilities and the media. I found it to be predominantly full of irrelevant tripe.

 

It can of course be argued that the content depends upon one's personal contacts, but here's the thing - eMails seem to encourage much more intelligent and expansive content than Facebook does in my experience; which is exactly why I binned it.

 

I am reminded of Sarah Silverman's comment:-

 

"I get confused between MySpace and Facebook, so keep inviting people to come on my face".

 

John.

Posted on: 12 January 2012 by TomK

I've found Facebook a nice way to get back, and stay in touch with, my family in New York and a few old friends.

If you don't like it, don't get involved and stay away. It's simple really. Nobody's forcing you.

Posted on: 13 January 2012 by Mike Hughes
I think there's a confusion between function and form. Facebook is clearly very useful and just plain fun for millions of people. Hard to deny that really, but that is not the same as the layout and functionality being attractive; accessible or competent. I manage an account for something work-related. Cannot stand it. Twitter any day.
Posted on: 21 January 2012 by J.N.

Is anyone else getting pissed-off with the world domination of Facebook and Twitter? They are often the recommended route into non-related web sites.

 

Unless I've got it wrong, I can't use Spotify without a Facebook account? Fortunately there is the excellent 'Grooveshark' which needs no such nonsense or sign-up.

 

John.

Posted on: 21 January 2012 by Julian H

John, you don't HAVE to sign in to Spotify with Facebook, it's only an option AFAIK.

 

I admit to having lost interest in Facebook. I guess it's great if you love it, I just don't!

 

Julian

Posted on: 21 January 2012 by Jonathan Gorse

I'm on it and occasionally I find it interesting to see what distant mates and relatives are up to but I don't go there very often.

 

The missus seems to love it and a lot of her female mates and mine are far more active on it than the guys are.  I think my Brother in Law's reaction was the best though when I happened to log in one night to show him something one of my pals had uploaded 'you've got to be kidding me' he said when he realised that over half the people I was linked to were 20-25 year old female cabin crew who seem to spend much of their free time uploading pictures of themselves on drunken night's out in scanty clubbing gear or in bikinis beside various swimming pools.

 

Getting middle-aged in the digital age does have some compensations...

 

Jonathan

Posted on: 21 January 2012 by TomK
Originally Posted by J.N.:

Is anyone else getting pissed-off with the world domination of Facebook and Twitter? They are often the recommended route into non-related web sites.

 

Unless I've got it wrong, I can't use Spotify without a Facebook account? Fortunately there is the excellent 'Grooveshark' which needs no such nonsense or sign-up.

 

John.

John,

I know nothing about Spotify or Grooveshark but it's not quality or excellence that'll settle this argument it's popularity. Numbers, revenue, however you look at it.

Facebook is crap without a doubt. New features are introduced without any canvassing of users as far as I can see. Stuff works then it doesn't work then it sort of works again. Much of it is clumsy and unintuitive. But it's what people are using.

Posted on: 21 January 2012 by J.N.
Further investigation reveals that a new user of Spotify can only join/register via a Facebook account. Hence my use of 'Grooveshark' which seems very good so far.

John.
Posted on: 23 January 2012 by Jet Johnson

Facebook is merely the medium and as such is the ultimate classless conduit between all kinds of different people.

 

It can be used to discuss ....Coronation Street ...the latest Big Brother .... Wayne Rooney's hairpiece......or what Jedward are getting up to .....

 

......or  Amnesty International's latest campaign ...Bruce Springsteen's latest album or...who might get the Republican party's nomination ......

 

Just like an earlier invention ..The Telephone ....

 

How come we didn't hate that?

Posted on: 23 January 2012 by rodwsmith
It's useful if you have moved abroad I have to say.

As a side issue:

Imagine if Alexander Graham Bell had invented a device where you could type words into a machine, and transmit them to someone somewhere else, almost instantaneously. Then you simply waited for them to read your words, type a reply in response, or asking for clarification, and they could send this back  for you to read. All repeated as often as desired.
Imagine this became the standard, until, a hundred or so years later, someone invented a device that, instead of requiring you to type and read, actually allowed you to SPEAK to your respondent, in real time, and hear and respond to their replies! Just imagine!

What a shame Bell didn't invent email. We'd have all grown out of it by now and got our lives back.
It's much easier to delete a spam phone call.
Posted on: 25 January 2012 by Salmon Dave

Still not as bad as this forum as it now is  .

Just had a look at the 'new' Linn forum after several months - what a treat!