Brain Teaser No 1
Posted by: Don Atkinson on 16 November 2001
THE EXPLORER
An explorer set off on a journey. He walked a mile south, a mile east and a mile north. At this point he was back at his start. Where on earth was his starting point? OK, other than the North Pole, which is pretty obvious, where else could he have started this journey?
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 08 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
Squambling
Now, I can't find this word in my dictionary, and Mrs Don is convinced she has seen it in one of the "Harry Potter" books....but which one - she hasn't a clue....
So let me define "squambling" for you....
I believe it is derived from a mixture of "scrambling" and "squaring" a number
To "squamble a number" you take the first (leading) digit, and square it; the second digit is cubed; the third digit is raised to the power of four; and so on. All the derived values are then added together to form a new number - ready for the squambling to begin again.
For example;
18 ----> 1^2 + 8^3 = 513
513 ---> 5^2 + 1^3 + 3^4 = 107
104 ---> 2402......
If you take my friend's age and squamble it, you get a three digit number
If you take that three digit number and squamble it, you get his age next birthday.
How old is my friend at his next birthday?
Cheers
Don
Now, I can't find this word in my dictionary, and Mrs Don is convinced she has seen it in one of the "Harry Potter" books....but which one - she hasn't a clue....
So let me define "squambling" for you....
I believe it is derived from a mixture of "scrambling" and "squaring" a number
To "squamble a number" you take the first (leading) digit, and square it; the second digit is cubed; the third digit is raised to the power of four; and so on. All the derived values are then added together to form a new number - ready for the squambling to begin again.
For example;
18 ----> 1^2 + 8^3 = 513
513 ---> 5^2 + 1^3 + 3^4 = 107
104 ---> 2402......
If you take my friend's age and squamble it, you get a three digit number
If you take that three digit number and squamble it, you get his age next birthday.
How old is my friend at his next birthday?
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 08 February 2004 by Minky
Don,
Your friend will be 47 on his next birthday.
Your friend will be 47 on his next birthday.
Posted on: 10 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
Minky,
Looks like you win that one.
Well done.
Cheers
Don
Looks like you win that one.
Well done.
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 12 February 2004 by Minky
Blinken heck. A week ago this thread was a vibrant community of like-minded brainiacs. Was it somefink I said ?
Posted on: 12 February 2004 by Dan M
Minky,
My guess is that we're all trying to grapple with the astounding fact the answer was 47 and not 42.
cheers,
Dan
My guess is that we're all trying to grapple with the astounding fact the answer was 47 and not 42.

cheers,
Dan
Posted on: 12 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
Was it somefink I said
most definitely.........
I think you said "47"
so, who's going to explain (in an ammusing and entertaining way) why its 47.....
Cheers
Don
most definitely.........
I think you said "47"
so, who's going to explain (in an ammusing and entertaining way) why its 47.....
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 12 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
and Dan is going to explain why its 42.....
Cheers
Don
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 12 February 2004 by Dan M
Posted on: 19 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
The 4th Dimension
Imagine a 4-dimensional physical space......(hyper-space?)
(this shouldn't be too difficult if you can occasionally imagine imagine yourself transported to Berlin and listening to The BPO and Karajan.....)
What will be the length of a "diagonal" of a "hyper-space" cube of side 10m ?
Cheers
Don
Imagine a 4-dimensional physical space......(hyper-space?)
(this shouldn't be too difficult if you can occasionally imagine imagine yourself transported to Berlin and listening to The BPO and Karajan.....)
What will be the length of a "diagonal" of a "hyper-space" cube of side 10m ?
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 19 February 2004 by Dan M
20?
My 'logic'
in 2-d l = sqrt(2) * 10
in 3-d l = sqrt(3) * 10
in 4-d l = sqrt(4) * 10 = 20
cheers
Dan
My 'logic'
in 2-d l = sqrt(2) * 10
in 3-d l = sqrt(3) * 10
in 4-d l = sqrt(4) * 10 = 20
cheers
Dan
Posted on: 19 February 2004 by Paul Ranson
I think Dan is right.
You create a square from a line by pushing a copy of the line away at right angles and joining the ends that originated together.
You create a cube from a square by pushing a copy of the square away at right angles and joining the matching ends.
A 4D cube is constructed similarly.
In each case one side of the right-angled triangle that can be formed with the diagonal as hypotenuse is the distance you just pushed and the other is the previous diagonal.
So that's enough of a pattern for me.
Paul
You create a square from a line by pushing a copy of the line away at right angles and joining the ends that originated together.
You create a cube from a square by pushing a copy of the square away at right angles and joining the matching ends.
A 4D cube is constructed similarly.
In each case one side of the right-angled triangle that can be formed with the diagonal as hypotenuse is the distance you just pushed and the other is the previous diagonal.
So that's enough of a pattern for me.
Paul
Posted on: 25 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
Dan, Paul,
Good answers, and reasons
For any "hyper-cuboid" an extended Pythagoras works
Diagonal)= [A^2 + B^2 + C^2 + D^2...]^0.5
Cheers
Don
Good answers, and reasons
For any "hyper-cuboid" an extended Pythagoras works
Diagonal)= [A^2 + B^2 + C^2 + D^2...]^0.5
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 25 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
(Con)-sequences...
.....and the next number in the (picture) sequence is......
Cheers
Don
.....and the next number in the (picture) sequence is......
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 25 February 2004 by Minky
I can see a very trivial pattern where the next number would be 20, but it's probably loads more complicated that that.
Posted on: 26 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
but it's probably loads more complicated that that.
.....errr.....yes and no......
Of course I COULD have just asked for the next number in the series 0, 2, 5, 9, 14.....
But I didn't.
OK the next number IS 20 (and the one after that IS 27....)
But I was hoping for a bit more of an explanation.
Cheers
Don
.....errr.....yes and no......
Of course I COULD have just asked for the next number in the series 0, 2, 5, 9, 14.....
But I didn't.
OK the next number IS 20 (and the one after that IS 27....)
But I was hoping for a bit more of an explanation.
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 26 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
But I was hoping for a bit more of an explanation.
....like....
How are these numbers related to the shapes?
(=very trivial)
Cheers
Don
....like....
How are these numbers related to the shapes?
(=very trivial)
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 26 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
But I was hoping for a bit more of an explanation.
.....like.....
if the shape had (say) 20 sides (all internal angles still obtuse) what would be the number?
=very trivial
Cheers
Don
.....like.....
if the shape had (say) 20 sides (all internal angles still obtuse) what would be the number?
=very trivial
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 26 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
But I was hoping for a bit more of an explanation.
.....like....
if the shape had 100 sides, what would be the number?
=very tedious
Cheers
Don
.....like....
if the shape had 100 sides, what would be the number?
=very tedious
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 26 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
But I was hoping for a bit more of an explanation.
....like....
is there a neat little formula....
Cheers
Don
= trivial (the formula and me)
....like....
is there a neat little formula....
Cheers
Don
= trivial (the formula and me)
Posted on: 27 February 2004 by steved
Don,
If "N" = number of sides, then number within shape is as follows:-
(N-3) * N/2
or in words (number of sides minus three) multiplied by (number of sides divided by two).
STEVE D
If "N" = number of sides, then number within shape is as follows:-
(N-3) * N/2
or in words (number of sides minus three) multiplied by (number of sides divided by two).
STEVE D
Posted on: 27 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
Nicely put, Steve
Cheers
Don
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 28 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
a NOT infuriating puzzle
as Dan M might say "very trivial" and I would agree.
But just to help maintain your sanity whilst loosing the will to live with Jerremy's little puzzle, here is another.....
The grid comprises squares each of area 1 unit.
What is the area of the red triangle?
Cheers
Don
as Dan M might say "very trivial" and I would agree.
But just to help maintain your sanity whilst loosing the will to live with Jerremy's little puzzle, here is another.....
The grid comprises squares each of area 1 unit.
What is the area of the red triangle?
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 28 February 2004 by Don Atkinson
shapes
oh!....nearly forgot.....
the link between the shapes and the numbers 0; 2; 5; 9..... is the number of ...
diagonals
yes I know you knew that, but the others didn't.....
Cheers
Don
oh!....nearly forgot.....
the link between the shapes and the numbers 0; 2; 5; 9..... is the number of ...
diagonals
yes I know you knew that, but the others didn't.....
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 28 February 2004 by Dan M
Don,
Oddly enough, just a few minutes ago I was reading a book on photography that was talking about 'negative spaces'. Since the area of a triangle is 1/2 * base * height, the area of the red triangle is --
7*5 - 0.5*(3*7+2*3+4*5) = 35 - 47/2 = 11.5
cheers,
Dan
Oddly enough, just a few minutes ago I was reading a book on photography that was talking about 'negative spaces'. Since the area of a triangle is 1/2 * base * height, the area of the red triangle is --
7*5 - 0.5*(3*7+2*3+4*5) = 35 - 47/2 = 11.5
cheers,
Dan
Posted on: 01 March 2004 by steved
Agreed with Dan!
Steve D
Steve D