My New Toy for Making Vinyl Rips
Posted by: Hot Rats on 30 December 2010
I have just upgraded my recorder from a Pioneer PDR-509 to a Sony PCM-M10, capable of recording at 24-Bit/96kHz.
I have ripped a couple of albums and the playback quality through my Evo/nDAC/XPS is a big upgrade on the rips made with the Pioneer recorder.
The only problem I experienced was having recorded four sides of vinyl, I transferred the files to my PC for editing and realised that I had failed to set the output selector on my NAC52 to phono. I had four files of Radio 4 ... One of my senior moments I fear! (LOL)
Happy New Year!
Posted on: 31 December 2010 by formbypc
For a few pounds more, you could have got this, which also records at 24/96, and on which you can do all the editing without transferring to a PC. Depends on where you want the end result files/discs, though -
Alesis Masterlink http://www.alesis.com/masterlink
Alesis Masterlink http://www.alesis.com/masterlink
Posted on: 01 January 2011 by JamH
Hi formbypc,
Do you know if alesis will ship this masterlink box to europe and if so the approx cost of postage and packing ?
james
Do you know if alesis will ship this masterlink box to europe and if so the approx cost of postage and packing ?
james
Posted on: 01 January 2011 by Hot Rats
quote:Originally posted by formbypc:
For a few pounds more, you could have got this, which also records at 24/96, and on which you can do all the editing without transferring to a PC. Depends on where you want the end result files/discs, though -
Alesis Masterlink http://www.alesis.com/masterlink
Thanks for the reply formbypc. I looked at the UK price for the Alesis and the best that I could come up with was £728 as opposed to the £269 that I paid for the Sony.
Maybe you know how the Alesis can be sourced cheaper but a difference of £459 is more than a few pounds!
Posted on: 02 January 2011 by js
Zoom H2 is also not to bad for cheap thrills. Don't know the Sony. I bet it's great as a DAP.
Posted on: 02 January 2011 by Mr Underhill
Hi DJ,
I have been using my M-Audio MicroTrack in the same way for a few years, and have been pleasantly surprised by the quality of what I have got.
I have played with both taking the output from my EAR pre-amp, and also taking the output from the ARO and applying equalisation to the captured wav file; which was also educational, reading and then listening to the way different companies applied EQ.
Hours of fun and learning.
M
I have been using my M-Audio MicroTrack in the same way for a few years, and have been pleasantly surprised by the quality of what I have got.
I have played with both taking the output from my EAR pre-amp, and also taking the output from the ARO and applying equalisation to the captured wav file; which was also educational, reading and then listening to the way different companies applied EQ.
Hours of fun and learning.
M
Posted on: 03 January 2011 by AMA
quote:have played with both taking the output from my EAR pre-amp, and also taking the output from the ARO and applying equalisation to the captured wav file; which was also educational, reading and then listening to the way different companies applied EQ.
Underhill, can you provide the summary of your experience?
Posted on: 03 January 2011 by Hot Rats
quote:Originally posted by AMA:quote:have played with both taking the output from my EAR pre-amp, and also taking the output from the ARO and applying equalisation to the captured wav file; which was also educational, reading and then listening to the way different companies applied EQ.
Underhill, can you provide the summary of your experience?
I would also be interested to know how you used EQ to the captured wave files ... Thanks
Posted on: 03 January 2011 by Dungassin
quote:I would also be interested to know how you used EQ to the captured wave files ... Thanks
Used an audio editor such as Audacity on his PC?
Posted on: 03 January 2011 by AMA
I'm mostly interested in the end result -- how did the direct-capture worked against phonostage.
Putting EQ in digital domain is not a problem and I guess is as good as analogue -- at least if original bitstream has a high resolution (say 24 bit).
Now let's recall that a phonostage provides a primary amplification of MC output resulting in a much wider dynamic range of the original analogue waveform and this can be a serious point in getting more open and fluent sound comparing to direct-capture. I'm not sure how good is the input gain stage in popular ADCs and Underhill's experience may be useful.
Putting EQ in digital domain is not a problem and I guess is as good as analogue -- at least if original bitstream has a high resolution (say 24 bit).
Now let's recall that a phonostage provides a primary amplification of MC output resulting in a much wider dynamic range of the original analogue waveform and this can be a serious point in getting more open and fluent sound comparing to direct-capture. I'm not sure how good is the input gain stage in popular ADCs and Underhill's experience may be useful.
Posted on: 03 January 2011 by jverlen
Has anyone tried the Zoom H4n for recording from vinyl? It seems to me you could take the tape out from the preamp and hook it up to the external mic inputs on the Zoom, adjust the levels, and record your LPs all the way up to 96/24 if you want. Then move to computer or downscale to 320K for ipod. Is this doable?
Thanks
Thanks