Carlos Kleiber - Beethoven 6th
Posted by: Basil on 09 February 2005
I bought this on the strength of his recordings of the 5th and 7th symphonies and although it pains me to have to say this, on first hearing, it's terrible!
The opening movement sounds more like "feelings upon arrival in the country, after being chased by a pack of rabid hounds"
I think this is destined to sit on the shelf, maybe I'll play it and it will "click", its happened before with recordings I haven't liked.
The opening movement sounds more like "feelings upon arrival in the country, after being chased by a pack of rabid hounds"
I think this is destined to sit on the shelf, maybe I'll play it and it will "click", its happened before with recordings I haven't liked.
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by graham55
Basil
Do persevere. Yes, the recording quality is bad and his speeds are brisk, but don't sound (to me) too fast. Orfeo also released a recording of him conducting LvB's Fourth Symphony some years ago. Superb, and much better sound.
I had the good fortune to see CK conduct his one and only UK orchestral concert many years ago. The man was a towering genius and it's sad that his insecurities led him to play so few pieces, and record even fewer.
G
Do persevere. Yes, the recording quality is bad and his speeds are brisk, but don't sound (to me) too fast. Orfeo also released a recording of him conducting LvB's Fourth Symphony some years ago. Superb, and much better sound.
I had the good fortune to see CK conduct his one and only UK orchestral concert many years ago. The man was a towering genius and it's sad that his insecurities led him to play so few pieces, and record even fewer.
G
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by Basil
quote:I had the good fortune to see CK conduct his one and only UK orchestral concert many years ago. The man was a towering genius and it's sad that his insecurities led him to play so few pieces, and record even fewer.
There doesn't seem to be an "emoticon" to cover "seething jealousy"

I have no problem with the recording, if I may be permitted to drag hi-fi into the hallowed halls of the Music forum for a second. One of the major strengths of the 72 is that it doesn't draw your attention to poor recordings, OK, bad records and CDs still sound bad but they are enjoyable non the less.
I'm just not convinced that the Pastoral Symphony is suited to Kleibers brand of genius. But as I said in my original post, I will return to this as I’ve hated things before on first hearing and then at a later date, perhaps after hearing the piece on the radio or at a concert, its had a second outing and something clicks. The best example of this is the Beethoven Violin concerto, I loathed this piece of music, couldn’t stand it. Then, out of the blue, I decided to give it one more try after yet another lecture from one of the record shop regulars.
I now rate it as the best Violin concerto ever written! Very closely followed by the Sibelius.
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by graham55
Basil
Just after I bought CK's Beethoven 6, I had the misfortune to suffer the rail journey from hell. We were eventually detrained and bussed round the country in order to get to our destination. Thing was, I had my CD Walkman and one disc: CK's B 6. So I played it in rotation five or six times over. And I was sad, in the end, that the bus didn't get lost!
G
Just after I bought CK's Beethoven 6, I had the misfortune to suffer the rail journey from hell. We were eventually detrained and bussed round the country in order to get to our destination. Thing was, I had my CD Walkman and one disc: CK's B 6. So I played it in rotation five or six times over. And I was sad, in the end, that the bus didn't get lost!
G
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by Todd A
Kleiber’s Pastorale offers a vastly different take than most other major conductors. I think he manages to make the brisk tempi work very well; it all holds together nicely. Compare his take to Herman Scherchen’s awful attempt, with a jagged, jerky sound, and one can appreciate Kleiber’s achievement. Ultimately, I still prefer more flowing, slower performances (Bohm, Furtwangler, Papa Kleiber), but Kleiber’s offers a fine alternative outlook.
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by Earwicker
Furtwangler's recording with the Vienna Phil has it for me. Karajan is a good all-things-to-all men reading ('70s with the BPO). I've been listening to Toscanini's live NBC Broadcast recording (on Naxos, 1939) but can't get on with it; don't let it put you off the rest of that series though... there're some blistering perfomances among them! (Especially Nos 3, 4, 9, and a fascinating recording of the Choral Fantasia.)
Earwicker
Earwicker
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by RossB
Carlos Kleiber's 6th is one of the greatest recordings of this work. It is fast, but by doing so Kleiber illuminates so many facets of the score that it is genuinely a revelatory performance.
On the other hand, Klemperer's slow, marmoreal performance is equally revelatory.
Ross
On the other hand, Klemperer's slow, marmoreal performance is equally revelatory.
Ross
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by wolfe_shepmann
Although I feel this work was Beethoven's big mistake, or possibly a musical joke he was playing on everyone, there is a "period instrument" version of the symphony by Christopher Hogwood that can be enjoyable if you're in the right mood.
Wolfe
Wolfe
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by graham55
Ross
I quite agree, and have Otto as well. Also Erich K and Karl B. But none, in my view, comes close to Carlos K. Staggering to think that it's the only one time he ever conducted the Pastoral.
Just imagine if he could ever have been persuaded to conduct the Wiener or Berliner Philharmoniker in Mahler Nine. All other Mahler conductors would have to have slunk off home.
G
I quite agree, and have Otto as well. Also Erich K and Karl B. But none, in my view, comes close to Carlos K. Staggering to think that it's the only one time he ever conducted the Pastoral.
Just imagine if he could ever have been persuaded to conduct the Wiener or Berliner Philharmoniker in Mahler Nine. All other Mahler conductors would have to have slunk off home.
G
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by wolfe_shepmann
quote:Originally posted by graham55:
Just imagine if he could ever have been persuaded to conduct the Wiener or Berliner Philharmoniker in Mahler Nine. All other Mahler conductors would have to have slunk off home.
First off, Carlos Kleiber always seemed more of a Furtwängler type and not at all interested in Mahler. Second, I really doubt anyone is ever going to put Bruno Walter (or Otto Klemperer) to shame when it comes to conducting the composer's 9th.
Wolfe
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by Earwicker
quote:Originally posted by wolfe_shepmann:
I really doubt anyone is ever going to put Bruno Walter (or Otto Klemperer) to shame when it comes to conducting the composer's 9th.
Wolfe
I think Sir Simon Rattle has a pretty good go in his live recording with the VPO. Karajan's famous recording impresses me, and I can't wait to hear Abbado's new recording.
Dunno what you mean about the 6th being Beethoven's joke - try Op 10, No.2!
EW
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by wolfe_shepmann
EW,
Are you comparing Birmingham Mullet-Boy to the great Bruno Walter?!
Wolfe
Are you comparing Birmingham Mullet-Boy to the great Bruno Walter?!
Wolfe
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by graham55
That's a great put-down! But great old "Glorious John" Barbirolli made great music with the Berliner Philharmoniker in Mahler Nine in 1964 (I think).
I still maintain, to get back to the thread, that Carlos Kleiber would have beaten all comers. Have seen previous thread suggesting that CK was not a Mahler conductor. But I have two pirate recordings of (the same concert of) Das Lied Von Der Erde which tell a very different story!
G
I still maintain, to get back to the thread, that Carlos Kleiber would have beaten all comers. Have seen previous thread suggesting that CK was not a Mahler conductor. But I have two pirate recordings of (the same concert of) Das Lied Von Der Erde which tell a very different story!
G
Posted on: 09 February 2005 by Basil
quote:It is fast, but by doing so Kleiber illuminates so many facets of the score that it is genuinely a revelatory performance.
I'm reminded of an anecdote in one of LJK Setright's columns.
He was talking to Sandy Jacob after a performance of Daphnis et Chloe conducted by Giulini at the RFH, and remarked on the brilliance of the performance, Jacob's reply was "Giulini took it a bit slower than usual; so, just for once, we had time to play all the notes".
Posted on: 10 February 2005 by Earwicker
quote:Originally posted by graham55:
But I have two pirate recordings of (the same concert of) Das Lied Von Der Erde which tell a very different story!
G
Lucky you!!!! Who were the singers?
EW
Posted on: 10 February 2005 by graham55
The singers were Christa Ludwig and Waldemarr Kmentt and the orchestra the Wiener Symphoniker. Recording quality on both is terrible. I think that they were probably recorded onto wax cylinder equipment, but using toilet rolls instead of pristine wax.
G
G
Posted on: 10 February 2005 by Basil
Would you be prepared to copy this onto a CD?
What? You can't expect to casually drop the fact that you just happen to have a bootleg recording of Kleiber and not expect someone to ask this.
What? You can't expect to casually drop the fact that you just happen to have a bootleg recording of Kleiber and not expect someone to ask this.
Posted on: 10 February 2005 by graham55
Basil
Don't want to upset Adam over this, so let me have your e-mail address.
G
Don't want to upset Adam over this, so let me have your e-mail address.
G
Posted on: 10 February 2005 by graham55
Basil
You should have received an e-mail.
Adam
No money will be changing hands. Honest!
G
You should have received an e-mail.
Adam
No money will be changing hands. Honest!
G
Posted on: 10 February 2005 by Basil
Got it, you have a reply.