Keep DEATH off the Roads

Posted by: Steve Toy on 05 December 2004

It's December, the month for a greater number of drink-drivers who drive slowly and erratically, ocasionally getting in my way while I ferry punters around the countryside of Mid-Staffordshire and beyond.

Whilst I will never condone drink-driving, most of those who take the risk of getting behind the wheel of a car after a few drinks tend to keep a low profile, drive to the speed limit or below, and just let you overtake them when a safe opportunity arises...

I was given a job on Saturday night to pick up an elderly couple from a hotel in a neighbouring town at 11.30 pm. Wishing to be as punctual as possible under these circumstances I put my foot down a bit on the open road - a straight stretch of road nearly a mile long across Cannock Chase with good visibility. I came upon a car travelling at less than 50mph in this 60mph zone and overtook it without incident.

My speed probably nudged the 70 mark before I came upon a second vehicle a couple of hundred yards further up the road, also travelling below 50 mph. There was still enough straight road in front of me and still nothing was coming the other way, so I attempted to overtake this vehicle - a silver R-registration Corsa with blacked-out windows and an oversized tailpipe...

As I accelerated and pulled alongside him I soon became aware that he had also started to accelerate. I quickly realised that I couldn't out-accelerate him, and I could now see the headlamps of an approaching car in the distance. I glanced at my speedometer and its reading was just above 80, so I aborted my overtaking manoeuvre and took my foot off the accelerator with the intention of pulling in behind him. I've met idiots who can't stand being overtaken before, but this particular specimen went one stage further...

Having proved that he could out-accelerate me in his hot hatch, he then attempted to prove that he could out-brake me, and he effectively pinned me in the outside lane in the face of an on-coming vehicle.

At this point I started to panic a little and just stood on my brakes. As my speed dropped to around 30mph we were still neck-and-neck with the oncoming vehicle looming ever closer.

Finally, given that the Skoda Octavia I drive is equipped with disc brakes all round, I managed to out-brake him and pull in behind, with seconds to go before impact with the oncoming vehicle. Once I was safely behind him he sped back up to just under 50 mph.

I waited a few seconds before briefly switching on my main beams in order to see his rear number plate more clearly (it was partly covered in salt from the road). He promptly switched on his rear foglamps before slowing down to 40 mph.

As we entered a 30 mph zone his speed dropped to a little over 20 mph and he began gently weaving slightly across the central white lines.

I finally lost him at the next set of traffic lights, and I was 9 minutes late picking up the elderly couple who were waiting outside in the cold. They were very sympathetic when I told them what had happened.

I want to report the incident to the police, but as there were no witnesses I guess I'd be wasting my time - and theirs.

I'm aware that in the event of surviving a head-on collision under such circumstances, I'd more-than-likely be charged with reckless driving as my version of events would be highly implausible.

I welcome your comments chaps.

Regards,

Steve.

PS: As a rule I don't overtake vehicles that are already travelling at or above the posted speed limit on single-carriageway roads.

[This message was edited by Steve Toy on Mon 06 December 2004 at 5:58.]
Posted on: 09 December 2004 by Paul Ranson
Andy,

You haven't explained why not being in the right gear for your speed is safer. I'm not suggesting using the engine instead of the brakes, I want to downshift while braking to ensure a smooth transition from braking to accelerating, should the opportunity arise, say on the way into a roundabout.

The Roadcraft method is clearly impossible on a motorbike, so I don't see that it can be a safety issue.

Certainly it would seem to be unsafe to make a decision to continue onto a roundabout and then have to find the gear. So I must be missing something.

Paul

[This message was edited by Paul Ranson on Thu 09 December 2004 at 22:48.]
Posted on: 09 December 2004 by John Sheridan
quote:

Certainly it would seem to be unsafe to make a decision to continue onto a roundabout and then have to find the gear. So I must be missing something.


Paul it's this bit that I'm trying to work out myself.
Posted on: 09 December 2004 by Paul Ranson
After some thought it's obvious that on a bike you downshift with your foot so that doesn't involve compromising steering.

If I'm going to be involved in a control crisis whether braking or not it's much more important to me that I know where straight ahead is than whether my arms are crossed. The other vital concern in such an event is to be able to apply or remove lock very quickly, which you cannot do in a shuffle.

Luckily on the road it's a very rare event.

Paul
Posted on: 10 December 2004 by Steve G
quote:
Originally posted by Paul Ranson:
Do they explain why 'push-pull steering' and changing down while still braking are dangerous? ISTM that both deprecated practices are essential to smooth driving.


I've done advanced training but not an advanced test as I find their regimes too prescriptive.

Coming from a motorcycle background (with sequential gearboxes) it's always been my preference to match gears to speed when slowing, unless I'm doing an emergency stop.
Posted on: 10 December 2004 by Steve G
quote:
Originally posted by Paul Ranson:
After some thought it's obvious that on a bike you downshift with your foot so that doesn't involve compromising steering.


The clutch is bar mounted though.
Posted on: 10 December 2004 by andy c
quote:
The Roadcraft method is clearly impossible on a motorbike, so I don't see that it can be a safety issue.


I did my advanced driver training in Ford Granadas, Vauxhall Senators, Sierra Cosworths and 4x4's etc. Winker I didn't do them on a bike.

I do hold a full bike licence tho, and did downshift whilst braking, but didn't engage the engine until I'd braked enough then to engage the correct gear. I'm not sure what roadcraft suggests for this but I'll ask someone who did do the advanced on a bike, and get back to you.

The ironic thing about this way of driving is that, if you do it right, it makes you smoother and infact speeds up your driving process, therefore seeming to make things safer. (If you know what I mean).

The querstion on reduced visibility is answered the same, by treating the reduced visibility as a hazard, and reducing speed accordingly so you can stop in the distance you can see to be clear. With todays congestion, and also the attitude of some drivers, this proves nearly impossible to do sometimes.

regards

andy c!
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by blythe
quote:

PS: Seeing as you live near me, here is the registration no. of a vehicle you should NEVER attempt to overtake, no matter how slowly it's going: R292 EGA.


Hi Steve, errr, would that be your car by any chance??????

Computers are supposed to work on 1's and 0's - in other words "Yes" or "No" - why does mine frequently say "Maybe"?......
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Steve Toy
blythe,

Err, no. My car would never be going that slowly unless behind another slow-moving vehicle. Big Grin

The above reg is for the chavmobile.

The taxi is on a 51 plate - no taxi where I work can be more than 6 years old unless it's a cab.

Regards,

Steve.
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by andy c
Lol, Steve,
name and shame, thats what I say!

andy c!
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by JeremyD
Although my driving instructor taught me not to change down while braking, I have done so ever since the day I passed my test because having the right gear for your speed gives you more control. I haven't yet heard a convincing argument that the taught method is better.

In fact, I don't recall seeing many people driving in the prescribed manner but those I have seen have tended to drift along with the clutch in before changing down - hardly safe! Roll Eyes
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Berlin Fritz
I couldn't help hitting a roller gently up the arse once in icy conditions on a minor road in the dark, the guy got out, gave me a score and said forget it >John, stunk of brandy he did !


Fritz Von realworld innit Big Grin
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Nime
One of the most interesting exercises. One that endlessly hones your driving skills. Is always staying on your own side of the white line. And doing so on every road and every corner. No matter how narrow or twisting.
Many seem to think that cutting every corner and using all the road makes them a racing driver. I can often leave much faster cars with average drivers standing. By driving round each corner as if on rails. While they are cutting huge chunks off the opposite lane and losing 20 yards on every corner into the bargain. But give them a straight (even in a speed restricted village) and they suddenly become world-class drivers. Roll Eyes

Nime
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Chris Metcalfe
"I have just reported the incident to the police. "
I haven't bothered to read past page One of this thread.

Steven, you were doing 80 mph in a 60 mph limit zone. You became easily emotionally challenged by another driver to break the law and drive dangerously. You call yourself a professional driver. Don't come that 'I wasn't driving dangerously it was the other bloke' crap.

Sit back and have a good hard think about things lad. Do all taxi drivers need to be Michael Schumacher?
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by andy c
quote:
Although my driving instructor taught me not to change down while braking, I have done so ever since the day I passed my test because having the right gear for your speed gives you more control. I haven't yet heard a convincing argument that the taught method is better.

In fact, I don't recall seeing many people driving in the prescribed manner but those I have seen have tended to drift along with the clutch in before changing down - hardly safe!


Your instructor was right

If you are changing down, whilst using your brakes, it increase engine wear, but also reduces the braking effectiveness of the vehicle. This is because when you take your foot of the accelerator to press the brake pedal, engine braking is happening. Its the same theory for an emergency stop - if your left foot is over the clutch, and you need to brake suddenly, you may inadvertantly press the clutch pedal in, actually for a split second causing the vehicle to speed up.

Brake or use acceleration sense to slow the vehicle down, then change gear to the correct one needed to then make progress. Much smoother, actually quicker, and above all safer.

But hey, what do i know?

andy c!
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Brian OReilly
quote:
Originally posted by Nime:
One of the most interesting exercises. One that endlessly hones your driving skills. Is always staying on your own side of the white line. And doing so on every road and every corner. No matter how narrow or twisting.
Many seem to think that cutting every corner and using all the road makes them a racing driver. I can often leave much faster cars with average drivers standing. By driving round each corner as if on rails. While they are cutting huge chunks off the opposite lane and losing 20 yards on every corner into the bargain. But give them a straight (even in a speed restricted village) and they suddenly become world-class drivers. Roll Eyes

Nime


Sorry, Nime,

I'm not sure what your point is, but you're wrong. Using both sides of the road massively improves your vision through the corner, giving you advanced warning of hazards - stationary vehicles etc. It's not about maximum cornering speed, in fact, cornering at normal speed on the wide line reduces the cornering force on the car, thereby reducing the risk of skidding.

Brian OReilly
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by andy c
Brian, good point well put Big Grin

andy c!
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Paul Ranson
quote:
If you are changing down, whilst using your brakes, it increase engine wear, but also reduces the braking effectiveness of the vehicle. This is because when you take your foot of the accelerator to press the brake pedal, engine braking is happening. Its the same theory for an emergency stop - if your left foot is over the clutch, and you need to brake suddenly, you may inadvertantly press the clutch pedal in, actually for a split second causing the vehicle to speed up.

Sorry, none of the above makes any sense at all...

quote:
Brake or use acceleration sense to slow the vehicle down, then change gear to the correct one needed to then make progress. Much smoother, actually quicker, and above all safer.

What you appear to be advocating is brake-wait while you change gear-accelerate. This is definitely not smooth or quick compared to brake-accelerate. And I don't understand how it can be safer. Or compatible with the essential ideal of anticipation.

Paul
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Nime
quote:
Originally posted by Brian OReilly:

I'm not sure what your point is, but you're wrong. Using both sides of the road massively improves your vision through the corner, giving you advanced warning of hazards - stationary vehicles etc. It's not about maximum cornering speed, in fact, cornering at normal speed on the wide line reduces the cornering force on the car, thereby reducing the risk of skidding.



I disagree completely.
My experience is that most drivers cannot stay on their own side of the road because they cannot drive well. When forced to stay on their own side of the road by oncoming traffic they lose speed. Lots of it.
Many rural roads are now double-white-lined. Yet probably 80-90% competely ignore the lines. It is an offence to cross them. Yet the vast majority completely ignore the rule and the law on almost every corner.
The discipline of staying on your own side of the white lines contantly improves your ability to control the vehicle. Under all circumstances and all conditions. Not just when you can use all of the road.
I have lost count of the number of drivers I have seen overshoot sharp corners. Because their skill does not match their perceived ability. Even if their vehicle could still hold the road safely.
On today's roads you have no right whatsoever to use the other side of the road under most circumstances. Legally or morally.
It inevitably results in drivers who overshoot every corner running into the drivers who cut every corner.
I do not dismiss the argument about higher side loads on the vehicle. But I do dismiss your right to avoid it. If you want to make progress safely and quickly. While still showing complete respect for other road user's absolute right to a clear lane to drive in.
The road is not a race track. You cannot corner as if it were. It is a completely different world. To pretend otherwise is taking away other's right to live. Just so that you may drive as you please.

Nime
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by John Sheridan
quote:

My experience is that most drivers cannot stay on their own side of the road because they cannot drive well. When forced to stay on their own side of the road by oncoming traffic they lose speed. Lots of it.


but of course they should - you have to be able to stop in the distance you can see to be clear. IF you can't see then you MUST slow down - it doesn't matter if you can drive your car around a given corner at 100mph. If you can only see 50m ahead of you then you have to be doing less than 40mph.
However, if you have good vision through the corner then why not use the whole road?
English roads drive me crazy because of this - they just love growing hedges on corners here making corners completely blind. Couple that with ridiculously narrow roads and you have a driving nightmare.
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Nime
Excellent discipline isn't it? Nightmare? No. It is a real-life, life-long driving school. Where you practice endlessly for perfection. For every corner. On every corner.

Of course you drive within your stopping distance related to clear view. Corner as if your family was camped in the road around every blind bend. Corner so that you can stop safely. Even when the car is trying to go straight on and the road is wet and suddenly muddy. Very common here.

You are concentrating on that small appearance point on the road ahead. That point where the new view rolls constantly into view like a movie. Around every hedge, house and vehicle that obstructs your view.

Your mind is thinking hard about the consequnces of that parked vehicle, that pedestrian, that junction and that cyclist.

The "what if" factor is constantly going through your mind. What if that driver doing his usual emergency stop at the next junction doesn't actually stop? Are you watching his front wheels for rotation? The bonnet sinking on the suspension? Or his wheels stopping and the bonnet lifting safely again? With his nose sticking well out into the road like so many drivers with poor judgement and similar driving skills. Typical of many Mercedes drivers I've noticed.

You can never turn your head to look at your passenger. You cannot read a map or check your papers for the next appointment. You cannot use a mobile phone, change a CD or tape, light a cigarette or glance at a navigation aid while moving.
It would be illegal or immoral. And an offense against the rights of other road users. They have an absolute right to survive your stupidity. Your lack of concentration. Your lack of driving skill. Your speeding. Your cutting corners. Or your swinging wide.
Yet I see such behaviour daily, hourly and by the minute. Year after year after year. Decade after decade. Accidents are caused by bad drivers. Very, very rarely by unusual road conditions.

Nime
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by John Sheridan
just about perfect except you should replace "speeding" with "driving too fast for the conditions" and "cutting corners" with "lack of observation".

As for people who stick their noses out of intersections - I wouldn't point the finger at any particular car being over represented here - all I can say is that I have a dream of driving a tank.
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by blythe
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Toy:
blythe,

Err, no. My car would never be going that slowly unless behind another slow-moving vehicle. Big Grin

The above reg is for the chavmobile.

The taxi is on a 51 plate - no taxi where I work can be more than 6 years old unless it's a cab.

Regards,

Steve.

Sorry Steve, after posting, I realised that you probably meant the Chav.........

I'll keep an eye open and run the b'stard off the road Mad

Computers are supposed to work on 1's and 0's - in other words "Yes" or "No" - why does mine frequently say "Maybe"?......
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Steve Toy
Latecomers to the thread

quote:
Steven, you were doing 80 mph in a 60 mph limit zone. You became easily emotionally challenged by another driver to break the law and drive dangerously. You call yourself a professional driver. Don't come that 'I wasn't driving dangerously it was the other bloke' crap.

Sit back and have a good hard think about things lad. Do all taxi drivers need to be Michael Schumacher?


Chris,

Read my early posts again with considerably more care than you have already because I hate repeating myself.

It is dangerous to watch your speed during an overtaking manoeuvre.

If chavscum had been driving at 60 mph and not 47, I wouldn't have even attempted to overtake him.

If chavscum had continued at his chosen speed of 47 mph I would probably have passed him at about 65 mph.

If chavscum had begun to accelerate as I approached him from behind and got ready to pull out (by looking ahead and checking my mirrors) I wouldn't even have attempted to overtake him.

I only looked at the speedometer when I found he was alongside me for longer than I expected, because the little f*cker had put his foot down.

He didn't even begin to accelerate until I was already in the right-hand lane alongside him (presumably because he was waiting to find out if the tit on the roof of my WHITE car was saying "taxi" and not "police.") At this point I noticed my speed was pushing 80 and so decided to abort the overtaking manoeuvre. I wasn't trying to race him, I just wanted to drive at the speed limit so I could pick up the elderly couple who were waiting out on the cold.

In order to overtake safely, you spend as little time and distance in the right-hand lane and in face of potential on-coming traffic as possible - even if this may involve exceeding the speed limit for a brief period.

As they say round here:

There are drivers and there are screwdrivers.

As a screwdriver, I think you just passed the theory test.

Regards,

Steve.

[This message was edited by Steve Toy on Sun 12 December 2004 at 4:52.]
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Nime
Would anyone care to speculate on the likelihood of a conviction for spelling out one's own driving misdemenours on a public forum? Big Grin

Quote: "Honest guv! I were only doin' 'ba't 80. Corse I never looks at me bleedin speedo anyways. 'Less I've got me foot raht down like. Know what I mean like? 'Cus I ain't no bleedin' chav! See?"

BTW: Is the repeated use of the term "chav" a racial insult? Or a class-based derogatory term?

Nime Winker
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Nime
quote:
Originally posted by John Sheridan:

I have a dream of driving a tank.



Now that's a dream I can empathise with. Big Grin

But are we allowed live ammunition? Winker

Nime