Slack tarts at Palace let Batman in
Posted by: Spock on 13 September 2004
So much for improved security.
Top publicity for Fathers 4 Justice though.
Poor bugger nearly got himself shot in the process but hats off for a strongly held belief that things can/will change. Maybe this is not the right way to make a protest but what's the alternative?
Spock
Top publicity for Fathers 4 Justice though.
Poor bugger nearly got himself shot in the process but hats off for a strongly held belief that things can/will change. Maybe this is not the right way to make a protest but what's the alternative?
Spock
Posted on: 13 September 2004 by bhazen
Is it just me, or has the news been getting more and more surreal the last few years?
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Rockingdoc
Let these men see their kids. What's the problem???
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by 7V
quote:Their ex-wives.
Originally posted by Rockingdoc:
Let these men see their kids. What's the problem???
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Stephen Bennett
Don't be daft - you can't keep Batman out of anywhere....
Stephen
Stephen
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Rick Weldon
they should have had a copper dressed as the the riddler ask him three riddles and if he got them wrong shot him
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Rasher
There is obviously a huge security shortcoming at Buck House - they should be grateful that Batman & Robin were there!
How times change.
How times change.
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Mick P
I would suggest that any man who breaches security in Buckingham Palace has shown gross misjudgement and has not set a good example to his children.
If I were his estranged wife, I would argue that he is unfit to be a father and they are better off not seeing him.
He has done nothing for his cause and possibly alienated the authorities.
The man is a total fool.
Regards
Mick
If I were his estranged wife, I would argue that he is unfit to be a father and they are better off not seeing him.
He has done nothing for his cause and possibly alienated the authorities.
The man is a total fool.
Regards
Mick
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Jez Quigley
The Invisible Man pulled the same stunt today, but nobody seemed to notice 
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Berlin Fritz
Not Funny
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Mick P
The idiot who dressed up as Batman was about as effective in achieving his goals as the invisible man.
What as he achieved.......answer ...nothing.
Regards
Mick
What as he achieved.......answer ...nothing.
Regards
Mick
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Spock
So Batman & Robin go free today. If the reports are correct Batman has only seen his kids a total of 6 hours in the last 3 years which is truly shocking.
Sure we don't know all the facts but assuming this guy is a normal well adjusted chap who loves his kids, it's hardly surprising that a stunt like this takes place.
Spock
Sure we don't know all the facts but assuming this guy is a normal well adjusted chap who loves his kids, it's hardly surprising that a stunt like this takes place.
Spock
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Berlin Fritz
quote:
Originally posted by Mick Parry:
The idiot who dressed up as Batman was about as effective in achieving his goals as the invisible man.
What as he achieved.......answer ...nothing.
Regards
Mick me old China I have to disagree, desperate situ's require desperate measures and I'm sure her Majesty herself (Head of British State Law in Person) will silently agree old chum, innit, we'll wait and see.
G.G.
Mick
Posted on: 14 September 2004 by Berlin Fritz
quote:
Originally posted by Berlin Fritz:quote:
Originally posted by Mick Parry:
The idiot who dressed up as Batman was about as effective in achieving his goals as the invisible man.
What as he achieved.......answer ...nothing.
Regards
Mick me old China I have to disagree, desperate situ's require desperate measures and I'm sure her Majesty herself (Head of British State Law in Person) will silently agree old chum, innit, we'll wait and see.
G.G.
Mick
quote:
Originally posted by Berlin Fritz:quote:
Originally posted by Mick Parry:
The idiot who dressed up as Batman was about as effective in achieving his goals as the invisible man.
What as he achieved.......answer ...nothing.
Regards
Mick me old China I have to disagree, desperate situ's require desperate measures and I'm sure her Majesty herself (Head of British State Law in Person) will silently agree old chum, innit, we'll wait and see.
G.G.
Mick
Pisht: http://graham.ricketts.bei.t-online.de/downloads.htm The second track is yours unruly contemplating England long afore with my travel Grand Piano innit. YAWN²
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Rasher
Extensively discussed all day Mon & Tues on Radio 4 & 5-Live, with phone-ins from fathers discussing how the courts have let them down etc etc. Lawyers on the radio talking about the shortcomings in the law.
Achieved nothing?
I hardly think so!
Achieved nothing?
I hardly think so!
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by 7V
quote:
Originally posted by alexgerrard:
...This 'fool' has achieved more than most, I would say. And good luck to him.
Agreed. It's a question of taste...
Playing Batman on the Palace walls - effective publicity.
Throwing powder at the PM in parliament - too lairy.
If they can keep on the right side of the taste line the law will be changed pronto.
Steve
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Mick P
The objective from their point of view is to effect a change in the law.
So they embarass the police, the security forces and HMG. That is not the best strategy to adopt. They have played right into the arms of their ex wives who can justifiably say that behaviour like that is not what you do to set children and example.
The invasion of the Hunt protestors into Parliament was an equally stupid stunt. They have undone the excellent work in the Hyde Park ralley of a couple of years ago.
Getting this discussed on the radio is sheer entertainment value. It is MP's who effect change and you have to motivate them to do so. Theses stunts just achieve the opposite.
Total stupidity.......another example on pre planned non achievement.
Regards
Mick
So they embarass the police, the security forces and HMG. That is not the best strategy to adopt. They have played right into the arms of their ex wives who can justifiably say that behaviour like that is not what you do to set children and example.
The invasion of the Hunt protestors into Parliament was an equally stupid stunt. They have undone the excellent work in the Hyde Park ralley of a couple of years ago.
Getting this discussed on the radio is sheer entertainment value. It is MP's who effect change and you have to motivate them to do so. Theses stunts just achieve the opposite.
Total stupidity.......another example on pre planned non achievement.
Regards
Mick
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by JonR
Cruel irony for Mr Hatch though, the Batman in question.
If reports are correct his girlfriend's just dumped him, apparently because he's spent so much time protesting he doesn't spend any with their daughter!
If reports are correct his girlfriend's just dumped him, apparently because he's spent so much time protesting he doesn't spend any with their daughter!
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Berlin Fritz
quote:
Originally posted by Mick Parry:
The objective from their point of view is to effect a change in the law.
So they embarass the police, the security forces and HMG. That is not the best strategy to adopt. They have played right into the arms of their ex wives who can justifiably say that behaviour like that is not what you do to set children and example.
The invasion of the Hunt protestors into Parliament was an equally stupid stunt. They have undone the excellent work in the Hyde Park ralley of a couple of years ago.
Getting this discussed on the radio is sheer entertainment value. It is MP's who effect change and you have to motivate them to do so. Theses stunts just achieve the opposite.
Total stupidity.......another example on pre planned non achievement.
Regards
Mick
Good bloke that Oliver Cromwell, not like those other rabble rowsing cunts, innit.
Graham George Of England (Not A comfortbble I'm alright Jack Yes Man)
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Mick P
There is no need for that sort of language, please remember children sometimes read these fora.
You will never become a " Not A comfortbble I'm alright Jack Yes Man" with you foolish attitude.
Regards
Mick
You will never become a " Not A comfortbble I'm alright Jack Yes Man" with you foolish attitude.
Regards
Mick
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Berlin Fritz
It was said in context of what I thought appropiate, and if you or anybody elses kid's are reading these posts both you and their parents are responsible, not me John.
Graham George Of Gluepotimemethinks
Graham George Of Gluepotimemethinks
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Brian OReilly
quote:
Originally posted by JonR:
Cruel irony for Mr Hatch though, the Batman in question.
If reports are correct his girlfriend's just dumped him, apparently because he's spent so much time protesting he doesn't spend any with their daughter!
Irony indeed ! The fourth of his children from three different partners. Child custody is clearly an emotive issue, and every case is different, but a miniscule amount of fathers are denied access. You have to ask why ? Father likes to give the wife "a bit of a slap" now and then ? Child abuse ? Wife using emotional blackmail ? Taking revenge ? Who knows. But I wouldn't be too quick to jump onto the bandwagon.
Complex issue requiring complex solution not a fancy dress party.
Brian OReilly
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Derek Wright
quote:
Total stupidity.......another example on pre planned non achievement.
It was an ignorant, ill informed, emotional rabble who caused the Poll Tax to be cancelled.
One of the better bits of taxation policy that was not implemented with the correct number of allowance for the unemployed, students etc.
So people power, civil disobedience, does work - in some countries they are referred to as revolutions.
Derek
<< >>
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Berlin Fritz
Mick me old Mucker,
As an afterthought, I'm sure most people don't understand half of what I write
anyway (I'm not too sure myself sometimes either?) but would most definately be
as a parent (If I were one) exceptionally worried and concerned if they'd read
and took seriously some of your postings.
This is not a personal dig as such,
and I think you're big enough to take such critisism ! Joking aside, I find a
deep vein of classic inbred unimaginative brainwashed views within your posts
that belong unfortunately (IMDO) to many other people as well (I mean in Europe
& Westernised blinkered thought/mind-set Societies). This blind acceptance and
ignorance of what is really going on around one just delay's the next stage of
human evolotion ? for another half a dozen Centuries or so, as you guys
seemingly always win the day, innit.ie, the easy lazy option.
Cheers Matey,
Graham George Of Bloodypubwaspackedwithdopetokinhippytapeswunnit
As an afterthought, I'm sure most people don't understand half of what I write
anyway (I'm not too sure myself sometimes either?) but would most definately be
as a parent (If I were one) exceptionally worried and concerned if they'd read
and took seriously some of your postings.
This is not a personal dig as such,
and I think you're big enough to take such critisism ! Joking aside, I find a
deep vein of classic inbred unimaginative brainwashed views within your posts
that belong unfortunately (IMDO) to many other people as well (I mean in Europe
& Westernised blinkered thought/mind-set Societies). This blind acceptance and
ignorance of what is really going on around one just delay's the next stage of
human evolotion ? for another half a dozen Centuries or so, as you guys
seemingly always win the day, innit.ie, the easy lazy option.
Cheers Matey,
Graham George Of Bloodypubwaspackedwithdopetokinhippytapeswunnit
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Mick P
As you say, my type usually win so why not become one of us. It is pointless being a loser all your life.
I like being a "A comfortbble I'm alright Jack Yes Man" because it is err comfortable and alright.
Regards
Mick
I like being a "A comfortbble I'm alright Jack Yes Man" because it is err comfortable and alright.
Regards
Mick
Posted on: 15 September 2004 by Berlin Fritz
I prefer to think freely thank you; a gift you'll seemingly never experience through your fear of the unknown.
I'maloserbabysowhydon'tyoukillme
I'maloserbabysowhydon'tyoukillme