System Pics 2005
Posted by: Steve Toy on 05 November 2004
Further to Geoff P's marvellous pics on This thread, a new year and a new thread to post pics of your pride and joy (all-Naim or at least part-Naim) awaits so that we can all get nit-picky about placement issues - to your ultimate sonic benefit! 
Regards,
Steve.
[This message was edited by Adam Meredith on Thu 11 November 2004 at 20:32.]
Regards,
Steve.
[This message was edited by Adam Meredith on Thu 11 November 2004 at 20:32.]
Posted on: 09 December 2004 by Hawk
quote:
Originally posted by JonR:
....and it looks every bit as tall in real life as it does in the pic!
JR
PS: Any news on Saturday, Neil? Ideally I'd need to know by tomorrow night if possible.
dropped you a mail... cheers Neil
Posted on: 09 December 2004 by JonR
quote:
Originally posted by Hawk:
dropped you a mail... cheers Neil
Cheers - and you have a reply.
JR
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by NB
quote:
Originally posted by Hawk:
blimey, i should have dusted first! anyway... my kit stacked high NB styleee!!
Not quite as high tho hawk
Regards
NB
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Jason Milner
Here goes...
View from the chair.
View from the chair.
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Jason Milner
and...
The boxes
J
The boxes
J
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Hawk
quote:
Originally posted by NB:quote:
Originally posted by Hawk:
blimey, i should have dusted first! anyway... my kit stacked high NB styleee!!
Not quite as high tho hawk
Regards
NB
Yet!!! Give me time! ones got to start somewhere NB
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by JonR
A quick preview, with a tremendous 'thank you' to Hawk for the pics, here is a photo of...
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by JonR
MY SYSTEM
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by JonR
More tomorrow!
JR
JR
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by Jason Milner
Er.. OK, not sure what's going on with the disappearing images here, they were definitely there a while ago... honest
Will have another go later.
J
J
Posted on: 11 December 2004 by J.N.
Good to see a system pic Jon. Very nice.
Is that Hutter?
John.
Is that Hutter?
John.
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by JonR
John,
Thanks.
Yes, Hutter it is, bought second-hand off another member of the Forum.
I'll say this for it - it's bloody easy to set up - once you get the base levelled everything just fits on top no messin'.
It's going to have to be upgraded to a Fraim though - if only because it'll make it easier to get to the cables at the back!
Cheers,
JR
Thanks.
Yes, Hutter it is, bought second-hand off another member of the Forum.
I'll say this for it - it's bloody easy to set up - once you get the base levelled everything just fits on top no messin'.
It's going to have to be upgraded to a Fraim though - if only because it'll make it easier to get to the cables at the back!
Cheers,
JR
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by sjust
Wait a minute, JonR...
Your pics are phantastic ! What's the trick ? Did you put light panels BEHIND your setup ? Did you put everything into a pro studio ? Did you do any retouching kind of stuff with a grafix program ?
Us "regular folks" (well... at least I) always suffer from the problem, that the walls are in the pic - even if they don't add info and just serve as shadow spenders...
Just wondering. Beautiful system, btw...
Best regards, freundliche Grüße
Stefan
Your pics are phantastic ! What's the trick ? Did you put light panels BEHIND your setup ? Did you put everything into a pro studio ? Did you do any retouching kind of stuff with a grafix program ?
Us "regular folks" (well... at least I) always suffer from the problem, that the walls are in the pic - even if they don't add info and just serve as shadow spenders...
Just wondering. Beautiful system, btw...
Best regards, freundliche Grüße
Stefan
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Edouard
JonR,
I love your set up! great picture of a great system!
enjoy it!
Edouard
I love your set up! great picture of a great system!
enjoy it!
Edouard
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by JonR
Hee hee Stefan, you are tooooo kind!
Thank you for the compliments!
Nothing so 'professional' however, though I am flattered that you consider them so.
Perhaps I should explain...
Last night Hawk came round so we could try out his Isotek GII mains conditioner on my system. It just so happened that he had with him his rather swanky looking (so-called) digital SLR camera, a Canon E10D if memory serves, 6.2 megapixel jobby, pretty handy looking to my eyes anyway. I would venture to suggest that any 'professional' look to these pics is entirely down to this marvellous device and Hawk's expertise in its use!
So I asked him if he wouldn't mind taking a few pics of my boxes so I could post them on the Forum, and Hawk being the very nice bloke that he is was only too happy to oblige! Oh, and he even let me take a couple as well!
As for the walls, when I had my house decorated some months ago I had it done with a view to selling it on to a (future) first-time buyer so decided to try and make the colours as neutral as possible. So the walls have been painted in a very light beige and I have laminate flooring to match which also has quite a light maple finish.
Added to which my living-room area has eight 50w 'downlighters' and I had them all switched on last night during our little 'photo-session', which probably explains the undue brightness that you see!
Hope that helps by way of explanation.
Here's another pic...
JR
Thank you for the compliments!
Nothing so 'professional' however, though I am flattered that you consider them so.
Perhaps I should explain...
Last night Hawk came round so we could try out his Isotek GII mains conditioner on my system. It just so happened that he had with him his rather swanky looking (so-called) digital SLR camera, a Canon E10D if memory serves, 6.2 megapixel jobby, pretty handy looking to my eyes anyway. I would venture to suggest that any 'professional' look to these pics is entirely down to this marvellous device and Hawk's expertise in its use!
So I asked him if he wouldn't mind taking a few pics of my boxes so I could post them on the Forum, and Hawk being the very nice bloke that he is was only too happy to oblige! Oh, and he even let me take a couple as well!
As for the walls, when I had my house decorated some months ago I had it done with a view to selling it on to a (future) first-time buyer so decided to try and make the colours as neutral as possible. So the walls have been painted in a very light beige and I have laminate flooring to match which also has quite a light maple finish.
Added to which my living-room area has eight 50w 'downlighters' and I had them all switched on last night during our little 'photo-session', which probably explains the undue brightness that you see!
Hope that helps by way of explanation.
Here's another pic...
JR
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by JonR
quote:
Originally posted by Edouard:
JonR,
I love your set up! great picture of a great system!
enjoy it!
Edouard
Thanks Edouard!
Don't worry, I am enjoying it very much, and will keep on enjoying it!!
Cheers,
JR
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Edouard
JonR, your TT really matches your Naim system and seems to have been designed for it. I've never seen a hutter rack that looks so nice!
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Alco
That's indeed a lovely system JR 
I was wondering though... How do you rate your Rega Planar-3 against your Naim CDX2 ?
Ok, to get back on-topic:
At this moment (till next weekend) I'm using an old Holfi Aura integrated amp.
(My sonneteer is being modified by a Sonneteer specialist dealer)
So, my most recent/temporary system-pic
This little amp still sounds very good though,imho.
(it's got a huge internal PSU!)
regards,
Alco
I was wondering though... How do you rate your Rega Planar-3 against your Naim CDX2 ?
Ok, to get back on-topic:
At this moment (till next weekend) I'm using an old Holfi Aura integrated amp.
(My sonneteer is being modified by a Sonneteer specialist dealer)
So, my most recent/temporary system-pic
This little amp still sounds very good though,imho.
(it's got a huge internal PSU!)
regards,
Alco
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by JonR
Edouard,
Thanks - yes the TT does look rather good with the Naim boxes, doesn't it!
Alco,
Funny you should ask; I was listening to the Planar 3 this morning. It was playing the fourth LP of the Pink Floyd Echoes boxed set when, about an hour ago now, I suddenly heard it 'kick in'! I'm currently playing 'Avalon Sunset' by Van Morrison on it and it sounds wonderful!
How would I compare it to the CDX2? Tricky one, that. I think the Rega sounds a little more 'natural' in the way it presents the music - it's like all the instruments have their 'place', everything sounds 'in context' with everything else, if you see what I mean.
As for the CDX2, well, it just rooocks!! In fact, I think the highest compliment that I think could be paid to it was something that Hawk said last night (and I think he might deny all knowledge that he ever said this!
) which in effect was that in his opinion, an XPS2 wouldn't make that much difference!

Cheers,
JR
Thanks - yes the TT does look rather good with the Naim boxes, doesn't it!
Alco,
Funny you should ask; I was listening to the Planar 3 this morning. It was playing the fourth LP of the Pink Floyd Echoes boxed set when, about an hour ago now, I suddenly heard it 'kick in'! I'm currently playing 'Avalon Sunset' by Van Morrison on it and it sounds wonderful!
How would I compare it to the CDX2? Tricky one, that. I think the Rega sounds a little more 'natural' in the way it presents the music - it's like all the instruments have their 'place', everything sounds 'in context' with everything else, if you see what I mean.
As for the CDX2, well, it just rooocks!! In fact, I think the highest compliment that I think could be paid to it was something that Hawk said last night (and I think he might deny all knowledge that he ever said this!
Cheers,
JR
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by sjust
quote:
Originally posted by JonR:
Hee hee Stefan, you are tooooo kind!
Thank you for the compliments!
Nothing so 'professional' however, though I am flattered that you consider them so.
Perhaps I should explain...
Last night Hawk came round so we could try out his Isotek GII mains conditioner on my system. It just so happened that he had with him his rather swanky looking (so-called) digital SLR camera, a Canon E10D if memory serves, 6.2 megapixel jobby, pretty handy looking to my eyes anyway. I would venture to suggest that any 'professional' look to these pics is entirely down to this marvellous device and Hawk's expertise in its use!
So I asked him if he wouldn't mind taking a few pics of my boxes so I could post them on the Forum, and Hawk being the very nice bloke that he is was only too happy to oblige! Oh, and he even let me take a couple as well!
As for the walls, when I had my house decorated some months ago I had it done with a view to selling it on to a (future) first-time buyer so decided to try and make the colours as neutral as possible. So the walls have been painted in a very light beige and I have laminate flooring to match which also has quite a light maple finish.
Added to which my living-room area has eight 50w 'downlighters' and I had them all switched on last night during our little 'photo-session', which probably explains the undue brightness that you see!
Hope that helps by way of explanation.
_Here's another pic..._
http://img71.exs.cx/img71/3170/IMG_0786.jpg
JR
That explans it all, JR...
Here's a weak example of what I was referring to when babbling about "retouching". Your own piccies are way more natural, though !
Best regards, freundliche Grüße
Stefan
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Martin Clark
From a toy digital camera in ambient light....
CD3.5*/Hicap/Quad FM1/Deltec DPA50S pre& power amps/ Impulse H2 in Rosewood. And mighty fine it all sounds today, too!
*denotes application of the forbidden 'M' word
CD3.5*/Hicap/Quad FM1/Deltec DPA50S pre& power amps/ Impulse H2 in Rosewood. And mighty fine it all sounds today, too!
*denotes application of the forbidden 'M' word
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Hammerhead
quote:
Originally posted by Martin Clark:
And mighty fine it all sounds today, too!
Yup, I can vouch for that. That system truly kicks arse!
Nice pic
Best,
Steve
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Alco
Love your system Martin 
I like the kinda sober/minimalistic setup approach.
Btw,...didn't you used to have a Nait-2 first ?
And do you have 4 maple IKEA Benno CD-racks,
against the wall, on the left side of your left speaker ?
If so. then you are the same person that inspired me to get those Ikea Bennos CD-racks too
regards,
Alco
I like the kinda sober/minimalistic setup approach.
Btw,...didn't you used to have a Nait-2 first ?
And do you have 4 maple IKEA Benno CD-racks,
against the wall, on the left side of your left speaker ?
If so. then you are the same person that inspired me to get those Ikea Bennos CD-racks too
regards,
Alco
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Hawk
quote:
Originally posted by JonR:
As for the CDX2, well, it just rooocks!! In fact, I think the highest compliment that I think could be paid to it was something that Hawk said last night (and I think he might deny all knowledge that he ever said this!) which in effect was that in his opinion, an XPS2 wouldn't make that much difference!
![]()
Cheers,
JR
I'll stand by that, we talk alot on this forum about 'you wont hear the CDX2 at its best until you add an XPS2' but hearing Jon's bare CDX2 reminded me what a great player it is in its own right... IMO whilst the XPS2 adds a great deal it can also in the process soften the presentation of the CDX2 a little... Jon's system sounds every bit as good as it looks, and it really rocks through those spendors!
cheers
Hawk
Posted on: 12 December 2004 by Hawk
quote:
Originally posted by JonR:
I would venture to suggest that any 'professional' look to these pics is entirely down to this marvellous device and Hawk's expertise in its use!
Stefan, Jon's been a little kind! all we did was just play with exposure and flash a little to create the effect... as Jon mentioned he has light walls and flooring so it was quite easy to pull off...