System Pics 2005

Posted by: Steve Toy on 05 November 2004

Further to Geoff P's marvellous pics on This thread, a new year and a new thread to post pics of your pride and joy (all-Naim or at least part-Naim) awaits so that we can all get nit-picky about placement issues - to your ultimate sonic benefit! Smile

Regards,

Steve.

[This message was edited by Adam Meredith on Thu 11 November 2004 at 20:32.]
Posted on: 11 April 2005 by kuma
quote:
It's 95% an acoustic problem.



oh.. I was just offering the solution for the last 5%. Razz
Posted on: 11 April 2005 by sjust
quote:
Originally posted by Alco:

To Geoff:

Thanx!
My room size is 5.10 x 3.90 meters.
Don't know the exact height though.
(I think about 2.40 meter.

Hey ! That's exactly the size of MY room (or garage, as Geoff would put it...)

cheers
Stefan
Posted on: 11 April 2005 by mjamrob
Hi Lee,
I am interested on how well you think the xerxes works on fraim.
I currently use mana (5tier) and am reasonably happy, but wonder if fraim could improve on a rather forward presentation, while preserving resolution (timing and pitch).
I have just ordered fraim for my naim equipment which sits on a seperate mana rack.
cheers,
mat
Posted on: 11 April 2005 by Geoff P
quote:
My room size is 5.10 x 3.90 meters.
Don't know the exact height though.
(I think about 2.40 meter.

Alco
The XL calculation for your room dimensions says the following:
Down the 5.1m length the room modes are at 1st = 34Hz, 2nd = 67Hz, 3rd = 135hz and so on
Across the 3.9m width the room modes are at 1st = 44Hz, 2nd = 88Hz, 3rd = 176hz and so on
Typically above about 200Hz furnishings and curtains help to absorb the modes and the 1st order is the loudest.
It recommends trying the speakers at the following "starting" postions:
Firing across the width the center of the speaker front baffles should be 57cms OUT from the long wall and 75cms in from the side walls
Firing down the length the center of the speaker front baffles should be 75cms OUT from the short wall and 57cms in from the side walls

These positions assume you are sitting close to the opposite wall (about 45 cms out) and the speakers are "toed in" a few degrees
The idea is to move the speakers around these starting positions by small amounts to see if the sound gets better.

It may be worth trying.
regards
GEOFF
Posted on: 11 April 2005 by Dexter
quote:
Originally posted by Lee Brindley:
Its the (in)famous Shun Mook weight. Borrowed from a friend. Ive heard it work very well on other players - just wondered what if did for the Xerxes...

On some records very good...surface noise reduced, wider soundstage, more clarity. On others...it just takes the fizz away, the soul. So inconclusive - throw in the bearing/designs issues and probably not worth it.

I know Touraj's views on these devices and whilst i accept these to a degree, tweaking has been around in hifi for so long, one persons view maybe different (key word) not necc wrong.

I still can't make my mind up on this bloody thing anyway!!!!

Oh btw you have to leave the centre spindle in.


Lee, I know exactly how you feel. I borrowed a Shun Mook knockoff made by Cadence Audio (India). I wrote about it here.Still can't make up my mind about it, although it's only €200. I managed to use it with the centre spindle off in an attempt not to offend Touraj! Smile

Cheers, Dex
Posted on: 11 April 2005 by Ken Lyon
quote:
Originally posted by Dexter:
Still can't make up my mind about it, although it's only €200.


If you can't make up your mind, then it's a sideways move at best.If it only works with some music and not on others, it's just imparting a flavor,and not a genuine improvement.
Posted on: 12 April 2005 by Mario
Just waiting on my cds3 to get built as naim apparently have been let down by one of their suppliers. Have to wait till next month I think. Anyway, did some system maintenance and managed to grab a shot of my home made fraim.

Mario.
Posted on: 12 April 2005 by Polarbear
He he he, I bet that sounds good Razz
Posted on: 12 April 2005 by sjust
quote:
Originally posted by Polarbear:
He he he, I bet that sounds good Razz

Nigel - uhm, Polarbear - haven't seen any pictures from your system for a suspicious LONG time. What are you hiding ? Split Fraim ? Double NAP500 ? Abandoned Neats ? Big Grin

Cheers
Stefan
Posted on: 12 April 2005 by Polarbear
Roksan TMS perhaps?

I have not taken any photo's of my system for a while now, I must do something about that!

Regards

PB
Posted on: 12 April 2005 by sjust
Absolutely, PB. This thread has always been your home territory. Winker
Posted on: 12 April 2005 by Justin
Alco,

All your problems will be solved with a pair of Rega Ela MK I's or II's. And as gravy, they are nearly free on the used market.

Judd
Posted on: 12 April 2005 by long-time-dead
Mario

You do realise that the real Fraim will be needed soon .................................. I think just after the CDS3 arrives............
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by silklee
My sistem
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by silklee
Sistem pic 2
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by silklee
side view
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by Edouard
Nice pictures of your nice system Silkee!
It seems strange to have the 202 on the bottom shelf, although if I do remember well, you tried different set up on your 2 Fraim racks and you said you had the best result this way.
Visually it would look better with your XPS or the 200 on the top shelf instead of the HC.

Regards, Edouard
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by Not For Me
Silkee,

Is that an Antimacassar on your listening chair?

Does it help?

DS
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by gusi
Dom,

Sorry about the late reply.

It is a Queenie Rack made in Singapore; not sure if they are exported. I picked it up while I lived there.

It is not particularly audiophile but does the trick, speacially the double has stack of room. It cost about ukp100.

It has a low and a high shelf so you could put the high shellf on top by inversting the pillars. The senta sounds better on the rack than on top of the TV.

cheers
Gus
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by Polarbear
Nice photo's silklee.

One comment thoough. I will bet that unit between the speakers is causing all sorts of distortion problems.

Regards

PB
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by Richard AV
quote:
Originally posted by Polarbear:
Nice photo's silklee.

One comment thoough. I will bet that unit between the speakers is causing all sorts of distortion problems.

Regards

PB


I have the same problem in my room but have no real other option, which is a real pain. It's very distracting looking at your TV and associated bits. I may post photos at some point.
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by kuma
The 300 & Fraim added


Posted on: 16 April 2005 by dave simpson
Nice one Kuma! Great house--judging by these and other photos you've posted, I'd enjoy a photographic tour of your entire abode.

Just curious...did you gain no sonic advantage using a Wiremold strip?

regards,

dave
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by JonR
Wow kuma great pics. CDS3/552/300 on two stacks of Fraim must sound absolutely amazing. Three questions:-

1) What order are the units on the right-hand rack (from top to bottom)?

2) What speakers are you using? Sorry if you've mentioned them before...my memory's lousy!

3) What improvements have you heard from the 300 over the 200?

Cheers,

Jon
Posted on: 16 April 2005 by silklee
David
Its not. I dont know whats its called. It is a piece of accessory where you put by the side of the sofa. It has pockets which allows you to put your remote controls. Bought it from Ikea.

Edouard
U remembered well. I thought this config was better for me. The space beside the Hicap2 is meant for my ipod mini if i do finally get it.

Polarbear,
Like what Richard mentioned, I dont really have a choice. I need a TV in the living room. One option is of course to get a flat panel TV and mount it onto the wall. I am very tempted to move the TV away and hear if there is any difference (which i suspect so), but it is quite a lot of work. The TV aint light.