Advanced search

Recommend some speakers?

Posted by: Top Cat on 24 October 2000

Hi folks.

I'm looking for a new pair of speakers. I have on loan a pair of old Audio Physic Virgos, which are superb speakers, and I have first refusal on them, but I want to find out what else there is at around the same price which might suit my ideal sound better.

First up, budget - AP Virgos (6yo) £1200 (new cost is £3500) - grey imports, though. These are Stereophile Class A speakers (FWIW), and are very nice, but the age is my only concern. I would prefer to spend less, but am prepared to hang off until I've saved some more if there are much better speakers just outside my price ceiling.

I like a clean, detailed sound more than a live sound; PRaT are important, as is imaging, slam, high end 'air' and resolution. My listening room is small, but I won't always be living where I am, so the listening room will hopefully be much bigger within a couple of years.

I'll add at this point that I've discounted all Linn speakers, and SBLs. These just don't do it for me, although I'm not knocking them. I may upgrade my amps to Mana Stealth within the next couple of years, but that's just a maybe, so I want a speaker that is basically happy with more modest amps as well as bigger brutes...

Bass is not an issue - I'd rather I had an ultra-high resolution speaker with less bass (as I have a pair of heavy duty REL subs already).

Any pointers would be welcome...

TC '..'

Posted on: 24 October 2000 by Nic Peeling
tc,

Given what you say you are after it might be worth keeping an eye out for a second hand pair of Yamaha NS1000Ms. I owned a pair for many years and bitterly regret selling them. A bit bass light, very room tolerant, incredibly detailed and neutral.

Nic P

Posted on: 24 October 2000 by Former member
TC

As well as the advice you wil receive here - try an earlier topic (on page two of the HI-Fi section) called "(something... something)aka a report from the Toronto hi-fi show" - started by Mike Hansen. After a slow start people started recommending various types of 'speakers to help with Mike's problem - and some of his requirements sound a bit like yours. I suggest this even though I got a pasting from a number of people re: my suggestions!

Talking of Mike - be prepared to get a lot of abuse for having a silly name on this forum...

Beware of officer dibble !

Jonathan

Posted on: 24 October 2000 by Top Cat
Thanks!

I just chose the Top Cat 'handle' as it's the same one I have on the Mana forum, where I've been posting for a few months now. I've been lurking here since July, though, but because I don't own any Naim kit I thought I'd keep quiet.

However, I respect Naim kit, and I love music and hifi, so figured why not pop in and say hi (if that's cool with the Naim guys)...

I'm in the market for an Aro anyhow, and my CD player needs replacing (transport noise, not affecting the sound, but audible and therefore a nuisance),,...

There... my cards are on the table...

TC '..'

Posted on: 24 October 2000 by Frank Abela
As you're in Edinburgh, pop over to Audio Salon for a dem of some really round earth stuff. I understand that he's a very nice chap as well. He does all kinds of tube and transistor high end. In terms of speakers, he'll have Audio Note and Zingali at least. The Audio Note E's are efficient speakers (94db/w/m), so they can be driven by 8watt amps, quite clean, great imaging, fair old depth and height (if not the highest), great drama, good pace, good clarity. I find them very involving, having owned my silver-wired pair for 5 years now.

Regards,
Frank.

Posted on: 24 October 2000 by Phil Sparks
another slightly unusual suggestion - I had (still have actually though they're up for sale) a pair of Neat Petites. They work really well with Naim stuff but have a different presentation to the traditional Linn and SBL sound. I think it's the ribbon tweeter that gives them a very 'fine' treble. The only downsides I had were that they need a fab pair of stands (I ended up with slate ones at £450 a pair!) and being a smallish box they didn't have mega-deep bass - but you've got a sub anyway.

Just a thought.

Posted on: 24 October 2000 by Mike Hanson
Speak of the devil...

Jonathan Ribee said:

quote:
Talking of Mike - be prepared to get a lot of abuse for having a silly name on this forum...

[B]"Top Cat" said:[B]

quote:
I just chose the Top Cat 'handle' as it's the same one I have on the Mana forum

It's silly on the Mana forum too. Don't be a child; please use your real name. Catch you later!

-=> Mike Hanson <=-

Smilies do not a forum make.

Posted on: 24 October 2000 by Former member
Top Cat,

quote:
I like a clean, detailed sound more than a live sound; PRaT are important, as is imaging, slam, high end 'air' and resolution. My listening room is small, but I won't always be living where I am, so the listening room will hopefully be much bigger within a couple of years.

Sounds like you are looking for the horizon where flat earth meets round. This is where I think the Dynaudio range fits the bill. They have a very clean and detailed presentation, have all the slam and imaging you are looking for, and ooodles of PRaT. Their smaller Contour 1.3s fill a room amazingly well, but if you are anticipating a bigger room, the 1.8s are quite incredible though they might make your subs redundant.

James

Posted on: 25 October 2000 by Former member
Shahinian Arcs are my choice, great speakers room filling very fast and time superbly, they are one of a few speakers that let me enjoy CD listeing almost as much as vinyl.

Cheers

Jason

PS, FWIW I agree with Mike.

EDIT: Oops, just saw you have REL's, I'm not sure Arcs are the way to go now, but for anybody else ...

Posted on: 25 October 2000 by Former member
TC,

I don't have anything useful to suggest about speakers. However, I support your use of an original name, and suggest you do not respond to people who are rude to you about it. It only encourages them.

dozy.

Posted on: 21 November 2000 by Top Cat
OK, folks, it's decision time for me.

I have first refusal on the (borrowed) Audio Physic Virgos, but before I part with 1200 notes, I thought I'd ask again to see if there is anything around at that price which can
touch these speakers for their versatility and musicality.

My biggest quibble with the speakers is their rather unusual requirements on placement - i.e. they like to be as far away from any wall as possible, spaced wide-apart, with the listener
sitting against the back wall. Odd. It does, however, work very well. Still, in a small room, I'd like to ask once more if there is a speaker out there which can provide me with a similar (or better) sound in a smaller package or with a much
more room-friendly position requirement, and at around the same price or less.

I know that I'm not likely to find a better speaker for detail and imaging and other round-earth qualities at this price, and it has the speed, resolution and timing to carry off the PRaT thing with ease also. However, I'm willing to have a 'last-gasp' look around and see if there are any 'easier-to-live-with' options. After all, my room is too small to have muckle great speakers planted in the middle of it...

Any last minute advice, or should I just go for it?

To date, these are the best speakers I've ever heard (including ATC50s, Living Voice, Naim SBL, Kans, my old Castles, etc.), but I'm everso cautious when it comes to the final push, as I don't intend ever upgrading again (famous last words )

Cheers,

John

Posted on: 21 November 2000 by Former member
John,

quote:
like a clean, detailed sound more than a live sound; PRaT are important, as is imaging, slam, high end 'air' and resolution.

Ah... Only this? That's easy...

There are two speakers strongly recommend for some auditioning that are smaller cost less and can deliver astonishing sound quality. I know the Virgo's quite well.

First, Sonus Faber Signums. Good PRaT with holographic imaging with bags of air and transparency. And, although a matter of taste, they look gorgeous as a bonus. I have it's predecessor Electa and still haven't found a replacement worth the investment.

Second, and this may surprise a few, The PMC LB1 or FB1. Yes, PMC stands for Professional Monitor Company. I've always been VERY sceptical towards PMC but I had a good listen to them a few weeks ago and I must say 'NOT BAD AT ALL!' Immense PRaT. Better than Sonus Faber in this respect. Imaging is a bid less holographic and airy but still very good. The have a very natural and coherent kind of sound that just makes you to put on disk after disk. The bigger floorstanding FB1, being a full-range transmission line adds trouser-flapping yet taut and detailed bass as if it's the most simple thing in the world. Impressive.

Richard.

Posted on: 21 November 2000 by Former member
I fully concur.
Posted on: 21 November 2000 by Former member
I agree.

PMC FB1 - heard 'em, loved 'em!

Great transmission line speaker with good PRaT and tip top bass - give them an audition !

Darren

Posted on: 21 November 2000 by Top Cat
Hi folks.

I'm intrigued to hear both of the recommended speakers. Richard, you say you are familiar with the Virgos - how do they compare against the Sonus Fabers and the PMC?

I had a quick surf to the SF website - not a lot of detail, but I really liked the look of the SF Homage (I think it was called). Any good?

Also, what kind of prices are we talking here? And do you know of any dealers north of the border? What about JM Labs speakers - I've heard good things about them (even if I think they look a bit odd; never heard them, though).

Cheers, guys,

John

Posted on: 21 November 2000 by Matt Gear
John

The SF Guarneri Homage is round about £6k new, and the Amati Homage is well over £10k. Both lovely speakers...sound great and look divine, but don't think they fit in with your budget?

Matt

Posted on: 21 November 2000 by calum scott
Music Mill certainly used to do SF.

Cheers,

Calum

Posted on: 21 November 2000 by matthewr
>> What about JM Labs speakers - I've heard good things about them <<

People who like what they do frequently describe JM Labs as an excellent combination of flat and round earth speakers. i.e. big expansive soundstage, very detailed, good tonality + good PRaT and musicality. Obviously people who don't liek them describe them as lacking the attirbutes of both flat and round earth speakers.

AFAICT they like a bit of space but don't have to be right out in the room like your current speakers.

Not sure about your price range given that the Virgos you are looking at are s/h but the better JMs are very pricey. You really want one of the Utopia models - there is a standmount Utopia for about 4k GBP or the very highly rated Mezzo Utopia for about 7.5k (a big floorstander with the air moving ability to compete with NBLs and ATCs). There is a cheaper range -- the Electras -- which may be worth checking out but are not as generally well received as the Utopias. Electras come is all sorts of prices and in standmount and floorstnding flavours.

I wouldn't give much for your chances of finding any s/h as they are relatively rare in the UK. If you want to know more or hear a pair you might want to contact Audio Counsel in Manchester who sell them. I'm not aware of any other dealers who sell them.

>> even if I think they look a bit odd <<

They are horrible aren't they. French speakers are as dodgy as thier beef

Matthew

Posted on: 22 November 2000 by Former member
John,

quote:
I'm intrigued to hear both of the recommended speakers. Richard, you say you are familiar with the Virgos - how do they compare against the Sonus Fabers and the PMC?

The Sonus Faber Signums offer a wider & deeper soundstage with more transparency and air (SF hallmarks). They give more insight on what is happening 'on the stage' so to speak with unbelievable detail. They are truly remarkable in this respect. The Virgo's have more authority and weight and go down deeper. AP speakers are really good but for me there is just something I don't like about their sound and I can't pinpoint what it is exactly. Probably just me! DO like their looks though.

PMC is a different fish altogether. They sound huge with a BIG soundstage. Not as pinpoint sharp as SF but that's no surprise with a small monitor vs. a much bigger floorstanding trans.line. More coherent and 'pleasant' an nice to listen to than the Virgo's IMO but this is more a matter of different than better. I've never heard a speaker at this price-level that combined so much of the 'classic' audiophile criteria (yawn) with such a catchy, groovy sound that just makes you tap, nod and move all the time. But then, this might not be at the top of your shopping list. REALLY worth auditioning though!!

Success!

Richard.
P.S. If you're willing spend more Listening to the SF Electa Amator II is a must IMO. This is where is really ends for me. Never heard such a beautiful natural sounding speaker without spending twice as much and even them I'm not sure. They just love Naim amps. Like all SF speakers BTW

Posted on: 22 November 2000 by Ken Dillon
Have you considered Rouark speakers. I have the Solstice Speakers and Im very happy with them. They have very good detail and good bass and seem to show up the timing very well.

Since you have RELs already you may want to consider the smaller ones, which have fantastic timbre.

Good Luck and Enjoy

Ken

Posted on: 22 November 2000 by Former member
quote:
The Sonus Faber Signums offer a wider & deeper soundstage with more transparency and air (SF hallmarks). They give more insight on what is happening 'on the stage' so to speak with unbelievable detail.

I think Richard must have believed he was posting on the Krell forum for a minute ;-)

Posted on: 22 November 2000 by Former member
Vuk,
I have an idea that funny things get lost sometimes when you have to write and read in a foreign language or:

- I'm not long enough on this forum (miss some history)
- I'm not farmiliar enough with your apparent god-like status on this forum
- I Have no sense of humor altogether
- A combination of the above

In other words, I don't understand your post nore the logo Vuk.

BTW, you can address me directly in your post too. As I read it you only want put me on display.

'Stupid Dutchman' Richard.

Posted on: 22 November 2000 by Former member
Richard.

The "Snappys" are a very old joke that we came up with ages ago on the old forum. The name is a combination of SNAPS (the old Naim power supply) and Grammys (the laughable American music awards).

We make up categories and everything is always a "nomination"--with the idea of a "prize" somewhere down the line. You may have read people kid around about "Reverse Upgrade" or "Most Hyperbolic Description of a Minor Upgrade". Well, those are some old Snappy categories. "Most Humorous" is the prestige one.

Anyhow, it's all meant to be in good spirit.

BTW--since I am usually associated with the foundation of Snappys (along with lurking Joe Pellizzari), people expected me to keep it running (it used to be in a single thread) so I seem to be doing most of the nominations--it's a matter of tradition, not arrogance, though you'd be forgiven for assuming the latter.

Vuk.

Posted on: 22 November 2000 by Former member
Two weeks ago, I demoed in Luxembourg a pair of Audio Physics Tempo III (associated with Musical Fidelity gears). Hell of a sound. When listening to these, you forget about all technical consideration. Music is what they do best, nothing more, nothing less. They should cost round EUR 2.6k or £1.5k. Try http://www.audiophysic.de.

Ugo,

LP12/Lingo/Akito II/K9/Cirkus/Trampolin, Karik III, Kairn pro, LK140, Rotel RQ970BX (Riaa) & Martin Logan Aerius i

[This message was edited by Ugo on WEDNESDAY 22 November 2000 at 21:28.]

[This message was edited by Ugo on WEDNESDAY 22 November 2000 at 21:29.]

Posted on: 24 November 2000 by Former member
Now I understand Vuk and I see the humor of it.

I'll take back my somewhat 'pointy' reaction then!

Richard.