Checks and Stars
Posted by: Jim Lawson on 27 November 2004
Are they gone for good ? No niggardly doled out single stars ?
Posted on: 27 November 2004 by Adam Meredith
Gone for good, or bad.
Posted on: 27 November 2004 by Brian OReilly
Good thread, Jim.
*****
*****
Posted on: 27 November 2004 by Adam Meredith
PTs still there but the vocal opinion was that star ratings had passed their sell by date as someone was rating everything at 5 - which was a bit "A" level and pointless.
Posted on: 27 November 2004 by Martin Payne
Adam,
surely it would be cheaper to restore the ability to e-mail another member, and then dump PTs?
cheers, Martin
E-mail:- MartinPayne (at) Dial.Pipex.com. Put "Naim" in the title.
surely it would be cheaper to restore the ability to e-mail another member, and then dump PTs?
cheers, Martin
E-mail:- MartinPayne (at) Dial.Pipex.com. Put "Naim" in the title.
Posted on: 27 November 2004 by Adam Meredith
There was (apparently) a good reason why this was removed. Spammers trawl sites for recognisable addresses - this was a problem and would potentially be more of one now.
Posted on: 28 November 2004 by Adam Meredith
No they weren't
Posted on: 28 November 2004 by Deane F
Nick
I'm gonna miss "someone who isn't here any more".
Deane
I'm gonna miss "someone who isn't here any more".
Deane
Posted on: 28 November 2004 by Adam Meredith
Who are they?
Posted on: 28 November 2004 by Deane F
Adam
I think they might be voluntary resignations rather than sackings. Can't get on with the new style of management.
Deane
I think they might be voluntary resignations rather than sackings. Can't get on with the new style of management.
Deane