Now this is Home Theatre!
Posted by: Frank Abela on 09 February 2009
Or it could be insanity...
http://www.getwonder.com/06/most-expensive-home-theater...m-jeremy-kipnis.html
http://www.getwonder.com/06/most-expensive-home-theater...m-jeremy-kipnis.html
Posted on: 09 February 2009 by {OdS}
I seem to remember that someone already pointed this out in another thread...! Still impressive though But I'm more into simple systems. I'm still enoying my movies in old-fashioned stereo
Posted on: 09 February 2009 by u5227470736789454
Do you think he has somebody walk around supplying Kia-Ora and FAB's from a tray ?
Posted on: 09 February 2009 by {OdS}
Can you imagine cleaning dust in this room?!?
Posted on: 09 February 2009 by Frank Abela
Sorry if this is a dupe but I just saw it. Thing is, I'm really impressed with the size of his record collection (and that model of the Nautilus).
Posted on: 18 February 2009 by rackkit
$6m spent and they end up watching a cartoon?
Posted on: 19 February 2009 by {OdS}
I guess the cartoon sounds pretty good
Posted on: 19 February 2009 by Frank Abela
I'm guessing it looks even better. Ratatouille is a blisteringly well rendered cartoon. Now I need to see Bolt, preferably in one o' dem 3-dee theyaters...
Posted on: 19 February 2009 by mjamrob
The biggest joke is the software source quality is still pretty mediocre ie your average film soundtrack on DVD or Blue Ray.
regards,
mat
regards,
mat
Posted on: 19 February 2009 by winkyincanada
I concur with Frank on the visual quality of Ratatouille. I think it makes a legitimate claim to being the "best looking" film of all time. OK, admittedly it is a little difficult (impossible?) to compare CGI and live footage but it is almost certainly the best in its technical genre.
Posted on: 19 February 2009 by mikeeschman
quote:Originally posted by winkyincanada:
I concur with Frank on the visual quality of Ratatouille.
i never could wrap my head around rats in a restaurant being a good thing.
Posted on: 19 February 2009 by winkyincanada
Ahh. Yes, well there is that of course....
Posted on: 19 February 2009 by John M
I was looking at his wife...looks like she hasn't had a tube rolling session since he got the rig. And 16 sub woofers?
Posted on: 19 February 2009 by {OdS}
quote:Originally posted by mjamrob:
The biggest joke is the software source quality is still pretty mediocre ie your average film soundtrack on DVD or Blue Ray.
mat
Mat, do you mean that movies soundtrack are usually crappy or that Blu-Ray sounds mediocre?
Posted on: 20 February 2009 by Frank Abela
Certainly, early blu-ray releases weren't much better than the equivalent DVD releases from a sonic point of view. The streams going to our newfangled hires-capable AV receivers were just 48khz versions of the DVD streams so still compressed. But the newer BD releases are having serious work done on their audio components and definitely proving to be better.
You gotta love that model of the Nautilus though....want one!
You gotta love that model of the Nautilus though....want one!
Posted on: 20 February 2009 by Max Bass
Looooooooooove the Nautilus!
Posted on: 20 February 2009 by garyi
You need to see WallE, just builds on the qualities of the rat film.
Posted on: 20 February 2009 by winkyincanada
Loved Wall-E, but I think the visuals in the Rat Flick are actually better. Both are really pixel-perfect, so I'm splitting hairs (or antennae) here.
Posted on: 20 February 2009 by mjamrob
quote:Mat, do you mean that movies soundtrack are usually crappy or that Blu-Ray sounds mediocre?
By 'film soundtrack' I mean that generally there is never the intention in the first place to produce anything that you need an ultra high resolution audio system to appreciate; instead comprising an impure concoction of music, sound effects, and dialogue recordings.
regards,
mat
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by {OdS}
Well, I watched Pitch Black on DVD-HD a few days ago and can definitely not agree with you on that! So much little details everywhere to be heard, great dynamic and so on... The same goes with Harry Potter (on DVD-HD too). Just my opinion of course
Posted on: 21 February 2009 by Trevor
So how does all this kit work.
I cannot see a wire, cable or socket in site.
Let alone a remote control.
I cannot see a wire, cable or socket in site.
Let alone a remote control.
Posted on: 25 February 2009 by Consciousmess
At least my Blu-Ray player is better than his!!
And I also think just the screen should be visible as attention goes away from the illusion!
Jon
And I also think just the screen should be visible as attention goes away from the illusion!
Jon
Posted on: 25 February 2009 by Frank Abela
quote:Originally posted by mjamrob:quote:Mat, do you mean that movies soundtrack are usually crappy or that Blu-Ray sounds mediocre?
By 'film soundtrack' I mean that generally there is never the intention in the first place to produce anything that you need an ultra high resolution audio system to appreciate; instead comprising an impure concoction of music, sound effects, and dialogue recordings.
regards,
mat
Mat, with the advent of bluray and the higher importance of the DVD market that's changing. Apparently, the soundtrack to Casino Royale was revitalised and reworked significantly in between the film's release and its bluray release. The editor (?) was quoted as saying that in a movie it didn't really matter much since audiences would be wowed the one or two times they went to see the movie in the cinema, whereas DVDs and BDs get replayed many times and so the soundtrack has to be much better.
Posted on: 26 February 2009 by mjamrob
Hi Frank,
I certainly take your point, I suppose my comments were made in relation to the way I listen to music in my own system, and the way I'm sure most Naim owners listen to music on their systems having invested a lot of money for the sake of enjoying music - the same incentive is not there for me with film soundtrack. If I really liked a piece of film soundtrack music I would try and get it on vinyl or CD and listen to it that way to fully appreciate it. Koyaanisqatsi comes to mind.
I love film, but for me the visuals rule and I use a nice little projector with 2 channel audio going through my main system, and as long as the sound comes across I'm not that bothered about hearing ultra detail in the soundtrack. Having said that Isobariks can do an awesome job with explosions .
A lot of my favourite films have shite quality soundtracks but they convey the message perfectly well.
regards,
mat
I certainly take your point, I suppose my comments were made in relation to the way I listen to music in my own system, and the way I'm sure most Naim owners listen to music on their systems having invested a lot of money for the sake of enjoying music - the same incentive is not there for me with film soundtrack. If I really liked a piece of film soundtrack music I would try and get it on vinyl or CD and listen to it that way to fully appreciate it. Koyaanisqatsi comes to mind.
I love film, but for me the visuals rule and I use a nice little projector with 2 channel audio going through my main system, and as long as the sound comes across I'm not that bothered about hearing ultra detail in the soundtrack. Having said that Isobariks can do an awesome job with explosions .
A lot of my favourite films have shite quality soundtracks but they convey the message perfectly well.
regards,
mat
Posted on: 26 February 2009 by joe90
If this is the 'poster-boy-and-his-weapon-of-choice', it's little wonder the hifi industry is in such a state, and people run to Bose and B&O...