Are you happy with Her Majesty's government?

Posted by: Sloop John B on 03 May 2006

From reading a few of the posts here (particularly the congestion charge one) there would seem to a lot of simmering resentment in mainland UK of your government.

From Ireland it's hard to assess things, we tend to lok on British governments from the point of view of Northern Ireland and certainly Tony Blair (and Bill Clinton) have done immense work there.

Are you all that cynical and fed up with your government?



SJB
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by erik scothron
quote:
Originally posted by paul_g:
quote:
Originally posted by Malky:

Perhaps we could reintroduce voting rights based on the number of windows in your property.


As the owner of a bungalow, I consider this unfair discrimination & an infringement of my human rights & I demand a recount !

However, I do agree with the principle of restricting voting rights & think that they should be denied to the following individuals :-

1. Those displaying tattoos, nipple/eyebrow/nose rings, tongue studs or mohecan haircuts.

2. People who say "ya know", "like", "at the end of the day", "the boy done good", "wicked" or end every sentence with rising inflection.

3. Those who habitually wear replica soccer shirts.

4. Owners of noisy mopeds and/or cars with multi-subwoofer stereos which can play nothing but rap music (with the windows open).

Basically, most under 25s & all professional footballers ..... Winker
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by paul_g
quote:
Originally posted by Donald:
What about those that can't spell - (Mohican!)


Welcome Donald

If you aspire to membership of the spelling police, you can look forward to many happy (but exhausting) hours here.

I'm generally considered to be a paid-up member of the grammar sub-division but I tend to excuse occasional typos in order not to seem anal.

Is your surname "Duck" by any chance ?

Paul
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by paul_g
Many thanks for the free bump Erik - did you wish to say something ?
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by erik scothron
quote:
Originally posted by paul_g:
Many thanks for the free bump Erik - did you wish to say something ?


LOL - I would hate for anyone to have missed your post the first time round.

I think anyone who wants to have a baby should should have to apply for a license. They should be vetted by a board of decent types. Those who pass will be free to have a baby. Borderline cases will have to attend special classes for a year and those who clearly fail (those in your list for example)will be steralised. Winker
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by erik scothron
quote:
Originally posted by jcs_smith:
quote:
Originally posted by paul_g:


However, I do agree with the principle of restricting voting rights & think that they should be denied to the following individuals :-

1. Those displaying tattoos, nipple/eyebrow/nose rings, tongue studs or mohecan haircuts.



Does that mean that I can vote as long as I wear a long-sleeved shirt to cover up my tattoos and piercings?


No.
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by Beano
quote:
Originally posted by paul_g:
quote:
Originally posted by Malky:

Perhaps we could reintroduce voting rights based on the number of windows in your property.


As the owner of a bungalow, I consider this unfair discrimination & an infringement of my human rights & I demand a recount !

However, I do agree with the principle of restricting voting rights & think that they should be denied to the following individuals :-

1. Those displaying tattoos, nipple/eyebrow/nose rings, tongue studs or mohecan haircuts.

2. People who say "ya know", "like", "at the end of the day", "the boy done good", "wicked" or end every sentence with rising inflection.

3. Those who habitually wear replica soccer shirts.

4. Owners of noisy mopeds and/or cars with multi-subwoofer stereos which can play nothing but rap music (with the windows open).

Basically, most under 25s & all professional footballers ..... Winker


Quite a misanthropical view with a dose of stereotyping, if ever I saw one; do you view the world with a monocle covering your minds eye?

Regards,
Beano
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by Malky
Beano
I think there is a possibility that tongues may have been in cheek.
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by jcs_smith
quote:
Originally posted by paul_g:



However, I do agree with the principle of restricting voting rights & think that they should be denied to the following individuals :-

1. Those displaying tattoos, nipple/eyebrow/nose rings, tongue studs or mohecan haircuts.



I've always wondered what it would be like to snog a girl who had a tongue stud. We shouldn't discourage people, well women, from having them until I've satisfied my curiosity
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by Martin D
err.........
NNNNNNOOOOOO
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by Malky
Blair, Prescott, Hain, Jowell, Hewitt et al Writhing around in a puddle of sleaze. Hope they get stuffed in the local elections today.
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by paul_g
quote:
Originally posted by jcs_smith:

I've always wondered what it would be like to snog a girl who had a tongue stud. We shouldn't discourage people, well women, from having them until I've satisfied my curiosity


What a sheltered life you lead for a (nightclub ?) bouncer.

I therefore assume that you've no experience of clitoral rings either ?

N.B. I excluded these from my original list on the grounds of good taste but I've managed to overcome my reticence.
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by Rasher
quote:
Originally posted by jcs_smith:
I've always wondered what it would be like to snog a girl who had a tongue stud. We shouldn't discourage people, well women, from having them until I've satisfied my curiosity

You realise of course that the original concept of tongue studs was for oral sex, not snogging. Now, would you like to amend your post?
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by paul_g
quote:
Originally posted by Malky:
Beano
I think there is a possibility that tongues may have been in cheek.


Infinitely preferable to a stud methinks.

I do quite fancy a monocle though - thanks for the suggestion Beano.
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by paul_g
quote:
Originally posted by erik scothron:
.... and those who clearly fail (those in your list for example)will be steralised. Winker


Or sent to China.

Or both.
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by erik scothron
quote:
Originally posted by paul_g:
quote:
Originally posted by Malky:
Beano
I think there is a possibility that tongues may have been in cheek.


Infinitely preferable to a stud methinks.

I do quite fancy a monocle though - thanks for the suggestion Beano.


Paul,

Don't go there. You could end up looking like a complete twat.

Posted on: 04 May 2006 by Guido Fawkes
quote:
Originally posted by 7V:
....So who should be nominated as our first benevolent dictator?

Regards
Steve


We could elect one.
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by paul_g
For all you know of course, I may already look like a twat Erik.
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by erik scothron
quote:
Originally posted by paul_g:
For all you know of course, I may already look like a twat Erik.


Nah,I'm sure you don't. Leastways I doubt you are in quite the same league as Eubank whom I see on a regular basis as he lives round the corner from me and is given to daily narcissistic cruising of the main roads of Brighton/Hove. However, if you care to post a pic of yourself we could all make comparisons. Winker
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by erik scothron
quote:
Originally posted by ROTF:
quote:
Originally posted by 7V:
....So who should be nominated as our first benevolent dictator?

Regards
Steve


We could elect one.


We already have Eek
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by jcs_smith
quote:
Originally posted by Rasher:

You realise of course that the original concept of tongue studs was for oral sex, not snogging. Now, would you like to amend your post?


I was trying to be polite
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by jcs_smith
quote:
Originally posted by paul_g:


What a sheltered life you lead for a (nightclub ?) bouncer.

I therefore assume that you've no experience of clitoral rings either ?

N.B. I excluded these from my original list on the grounds of good taste but I've managed to overcome my reticence.


As a gentleman I would prefer not to comment.
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by joe90
I'd make a great benevolent dictator, but since I am not a humanist, I would be very unpopular.

Mind you, I could just have anyone who stood in my way shot, eh?
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by u5227470736789439
What is a humanist in the context of dictators, benevolent ot not? I would make an appalling one myself, so if it occurs I advise early assasination! I very much doubt that I would be regarded as benevolent!

Fred
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by u5227470736789439
quote:
Originally posted by erik scothron:

[Quotation on electing benevolent dictators].

We already have


I am not at all sure that is right. Blair the benevolent? [Confused low banswidth smiley]. Fred
Posted on: 04 May 2006 by erik scothron
quote:
Originally posted by Fredrik_Fiske:
quote:
Originally posted by erik scothron:

[Quotation on electing benevolent dictators].

We already have


I am not at all sure that is right. Blair the benevolent? [Confused low banswidth smiley]. Fred


Fredrik,

Yes, Benevolent to Pres.Bush and benevolent to his family.

Erik