Great Minds of the Second Millenium?
Posted by: u5227470736789439 on 27 November 2005
Wilhelm Furtwangler was once asked who he considered the three greatest minds of the Second Millenium were, and replied without hesitation, "Michealangelo, Newton and Bach."
I happened to laugh out loud when I read it as I could think of no better answer, but dear friends, just for fun, who would your nominees be?
All the best from Fredrik
I happened to laugh out loud when I read it as I could think of no better answer, but dear friends, just for fun, who would your nominees be?
All the best from Fredrik
Posted on: 27 November 2005 by Deane F
A painter, a physicist and a composer?
I'd have to go with activists/writers for all three I think. They were the minds that stirred up change and to whom we all owe our freedoms.
At the moment I can only think of Voltaire.
I'd have to go with activists/writers for all three I think. They were the minds that stirred up change and to whom we all owe our freedoms.
At the moment I can only think of Voltaire.
Posted on: 27 November 2005 by u5227470736789439
Hello Stranger,
Art thou well? Fred
Art thou well? Fred
Posted on: 27 November 2005 by Mick P
Fredrik
Cardinal Jules Mazarin, Einstien and Bertrand Russel. Russel was a total pain but he did have a phenominal brain.
Regards
Mick
Cardinal Jules Mazarin, Einstien and Bertrand Russel. Russel was a total pain but he did have a phenominal brain.
Regards
Mick
Posted on: 27 November 2005 by JamH
What does greatest mean ?
Cavendish was a super physicist who did not publish but was found -- after his death -- to have made major discoveries.
Lots of unknown geniuses ??
In terms of influence it would be Hitler and Stalin ...
So, in terms of people who helped shape this millenium [hopefully in a positive way] ...
Newton
Maxwell/Faraday
Planck/Schrondinger/Heisenburg etc ...
Einstein
Cavendish was a super physicist who did not publish but was found -- after his death -- to have made major discoveries.
Lots of unknown geniuses ??
In terms of influence it would be Hitler and Stalin ...
So, in terms of people who helped shape this millenium [hopefully in a positive way] ...
Newton
Maxwell/Faraday
Planck/Schrondinger/Heisenburg etc ...
Einstein
Posted on: 27 November 2005 by JamH
Sorry,
Misread the question 'who made the most difference' versus 'who was brightest' ...
I would agree with Newton and Bach but not interested in Michaelangelo [bit I love music not painting] ...
James H.
What about Beethoven ...
ends==
Misread the question 'who made the most difference' versus 'who was brightest' ...
I would agree with Newton and Bach but not interested in Michaelangelo [bit I love music not painting] ...
James H.
What about Beethoven ...
ends==
Posted on: 27 November 2005 by JamH
I forgot Darwin and Godel and Turing ....
Posted on: 27 November 2005 by TomK
Matt Groening's got to be close to the top. The greatest philosopher of the second half of the 20th century. And he's got a sense of humour.
Posted on: 27 November 2005 by videocrew
darwin, da vinci, galileo
Posted on: 28 November 2005 by Roy T
William Tyndale (1494?-1536),
Sir Timothy John "Tim" Berners-Lee, KBE, FRS,
Bill Gates.
Sir Timothy John "Tim" Berners-Lee, KBE, FRS,
Bill Gates.
Posted on: 28 November 2005 by jayd
No Goethe? No Aquinas? No John Stuart Mill? Hmm.
Posted on: 28 November 2005 by u5227470736789439
quote:Originally posted by jayd:
No Goethe? No Aquinas? No John Stuart Mill? Hmm.
Dear jayd,
These would be your nominees? Really I was hoping people would propose there own choices of greatest minds, rather than demure at their being left out till now!
All the best from Fredrik
PS: What are Aquinas' dates? I think he falls outside the remit, but I may be wrong, of course!
Posted on: 28 November 2005 by jayd
quote:Originally posted by Fredrik_Fiske:quote:Originally posted by jayd:
No Goethe? No Aquinas? No John Stuart Mill? Hmm.
Dear jayd,
These would be your nominees? Really I was hoping people would propose there own choices of greatest minds, rather than demure at their being left out till now!
All the best from Fredrik
PS: What are Aquinas' dates? I think he falls outside the remit, but I may be wrong, of course!
Far from obejcting, I merely express that I find it curious that a thread such as this could get ten posts in without a mention of a single one of those three (and on a related note, multiple mentions of Darwin and not a single one of Alfred Russel Wallace).
Would they be my choices? I suspect at least one of them would be among my top three; perhaps more than one. (I believe Aquinas still has another ~200 years or so to make this list.)
Posted on: 28 November 2005 by iDunno
Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Albert Einstein?
Posted on: 28 November 2005 by Deane F
Does the Bauhaus movement count as an influential mind?
Posted on: 28 November 2005 by Jim Lawson
Probably not. Walter Gropius certainly would though.
Jim
Jim
Posted on: 01 December 2005 by Roy T
Not many women then?
Posted on: 01 December 2005 by Nigel Cavendish
Marie Curie
Rosalind Franklin
Emanuelle Beart (don't know about the brain, but the container is gorgeous)
Rosalind Franklin
Emanuelle Beart (don't know about the brain, but the container is gorgeous)
Posted on: 01 December 2005 by Guido Fawkes
- Snorri Sturluson (author of Heimskringla)
- Wat Tyler (led more than 100,000 people in a fight for civil rights)
- William Langland (author of Piers Plowman)
If I can have 4 then add Florence Nightingale.
Posted on: 01 December 2005 by jayd
quote:Originally posted by Roy T:
Not many women then?
Lack of opportunity, certainly not lack of potential. Here's hoping the next millenium is better.
Posted on: 01 December 2005 by Phil Barry
Did you mean o limit consideration to dead, white, Europeans?
Regards.
Phil
Regards.
Phil
Posted on: 01 December 2005 by u5227470736789439
Dear Barry,
I did not, considering that 'mind' implies 'human,' so it was meant, for me, to include all human-kind...
Fredrik
I did not, considering that 'mind' implies 'human,' so it was meant, for me, to include all human-kind...
Fredrik
Posted on: 02 December 2005 by Earwicker
Einstein, Newton, Beethoven, Shakespeare, Darwin. Shall I mention Churchill and Sir Arthur Harris?
EW
EW
Posted on: 02 December 2005 by Kevin-W
Einstein, Newton, Goethe.
Bach, Lenin, Feynman, Godel, Wittgenstein, and Kant and Russell thereafter
Modesty prohibits me nominating myself, but if anyone else cares do so I will accept
K
Bach, Lenin, Feynman, Godel, Wittgenstein, and Kant and Russell thereafter
Modesty prohibits me nominating myself, but if anyone else cares do so I will accept
K
Posted on: 02 December 2005 by Earwicker
Kevin,
Not sure about Goethe and Lenin...
EW
Not sure about Goethe and Lenin...
EW