A United Christian Church Future
Posted by: DAVOhorn on 20 February 2007
Dear All,
Is this really possible after 400 years of independence from Rome?
Would all Non Catholic branches rejoin to form a united Christian Church?
Or would religious bigotry vested interest etc etc get in the way of the potential reunification of Christianity.
I feel some of the more esoteric churches would baulk at their loss of finance to Rome as many of these are multi million dollar businesses first and faith second.
Interesting to see what the head Of The Church Of England thinks of this.
Oh yeah and the Monarch too.
Blair would be up for it as his Wife would tell him to reunite the Anglican Church with Rome under the leadership of the Papacy.
Should be a fun debate .
regards David
Is this really possible after 400 years of independence from Rome?
Would all Non Catholic branches rejoin to form a united Christian Church?
Or would religious bigotry vested interest etc etc get in the way of the potential reunification of Christianity.
I feel some of the more esoteric churches would baulk at their loss of finance to Rome as many of these are multi million dollar businesses first and faith second.
Interesting to see what the head Of The Church Of England thinks of this.
Oh yeah and the Monarch too.
Blair would be up for it as his Wife would tell him to reunite the Anglican Church with Rome under the leadership of the Papacy.
Should be a fun debate .
regards David
Posted on: 12 March 2007 by Deane F
Acad
I gave up philosophy years ago. It's as much of a waste of time as using a game of chess to try to discover why your washing machine doesn't work. Western philosophy is a game - nothing more. At least the pure mathemeticians take pride in their field not being of any use to anyone. Wish the philosphers could make the same toast at their own dinners.
I've read what you've written intelligently, thanks. However, the best (and worst) advertisement for any system of belief is the buggers that carry the cards. "Ye shall know them by their fruits." On that basis alone I will not invest my heart and soul into any religion that I have come across. Hell, I had started on my journey to convert to Judaism (Orthodox congregation) but I am still too troubled by the situation in Israel to take it any further.
I'm tired of your personal attacks and snide remarks. I try not to return like for like - but I am not perfect and this text-based conversational medium leaves a lot to be desired - I am genuinely sorry if I have offended you or annoyed you.
Deane
I gave up philosophy years ago. It's as much of a waste of time as using a game of chess to try to discover why your washing machine doesn't work. Western philosophy is a game - nothing more. At least the pure mathemeticians take pride in their field not being of any use to anyone. Wish the philosphers could make the same toast at their own dinners.
I've read what you've written intelligently, thanks. However, the best (and worst) advertisement for any system of belief is the buggers that carry the cards. "Ye shall know them by their fruits." On that basis alone I will not invest my heart and soul into any religion that I have come across. Hell, I had started on my journey to convert to Judaism (Orthodox congregation) but I am still too troubled by the situation in Israel to take it any further.
I'm tired of your personal attacks and snide remarks. I try not to return like for like - but I am not perfect and this text-based conversational medium leaves a lot to be desired - I am genuinely sorry if I have offended you or annoyed you.
Deane
Posted on: 12 March 2007 by acad tsunami
quote:Originally posted by Deane F:
Acad
[QUOTE] I gave up philosophy years ago. It's as much of a waste of time as using a game of chess to try to discover why your washing machine doesn't work. Western philosophy is a game - nothing more.
Well Deane, I am apt to agree, western academic philosophers are all about making money, writing crap and banging their students as far as I can see (good work if you can get it mind you

quote:At least the pure mathemeticians take pride in their field not being of any use to anyone. Wish the philosphers could make the same toast at their own dinners.
They would be too busy discussing the word 'toast' to enjoy it while it was still hot methinks.
quote:
I've read what you've written intelligently, thanks. However, the best (and worst) advertisement for any system of belief is the buggers that carry the cards. "Ye shall know them by their fruits." On that basis alone I will not invest my heart and soul into any religion that I have come across. Hell, I had started on my journey to convert to Judaism (Orthodox congregation) but I am still too troubled by the situation in Israel to take it any further.
This is interesting - were you going to become Jewish or converting from one form to another? Orthodox are the chaps with the hats and sideburns yes? Are they not against zionism?
In some sense one cant entangle the religion from the practitioners and I agree with you there, but......on the other hand (as James has pointed out)we are only human and it is a shame (in some respects)to dismiss a faith because some nutters get it wrong. Personally I think all Zionists, Islamic extremists and Christian fundamentalists are aberant and barking - and they all share a faith in God and reverence for the OT (or at least parts of it)and unshakable belief that they are wholly right and others are wholly wrong (even though they have NEVER studied or better still practiced any other faith and can not speak from experince but only from received bigotry - at least my bigotry is my own

quote:I'm tired of your personal attacks and snide remarks. I try not to return like for like - but I am not perfect and this text-based conversational medium leaves a lot to be desired - I am genuinely sorry if I have offended you or annoyed you.
I am tired of being misquoted or misrepresented - it happens alot here - most of what passes as thinking is in fact just emotion in words and people get very emotionally attached to their views to the degree that all they read and hear and see is filtered through a mass of previously accumulated bias so dense it obscures or even blinds (I suffer from this too). I genuinely am not offended or annoyed - I have a strong inclination towards pedantry ('you should have been a bloody lawyer' is what I hear a lot) - I once contradicted a general in front of his staff when I was a lowly subaltan - I just can't help it

Posted on: 12 March 2007 by Deane F
quote:Originally posted by acad tsunami:
Orthodox are the chaps with the hats and sideburns yes? Are they not against zionism?
Hats and sideburns ("Thou shalt not cut the four corners of the face") - probably the Hassidim. Tend to be lumped by laypeople under the heading "ultra-orthodox" but this is thoroughly misleading. Even the Hassidim have split into various "sects". Very happy people if my personal contacts with them are anything to go by. What I don't like too much about them is the focus on a spiritual leader - (google "Baal Shem Tov").
Posted on: 12 March 2007 by joe90
quote:* God does not need a cause, but everything else does.
Actually God's cause is to save HIS people from their sins (that's in Matthew)
quote:* God is not subject to any form of analysis, but everything else is.
Actually Paul said we should strive and exhort with all longsuffering and search the scriptures (i.e. study the Word of God)
quote:* God does not need any explanation for his existence, but everything else does.
The Bible explains the reasons for his existance very well - he wishes to be a Father and a Saviour etc etc
quote:* God must not conform to rules of logic, but everything else must.
If you mean your 'logic' that man tansmuted from a monkey or some such 'theory' (and I emphasise the word 'theory' here, eve though it's taught as a law)
quote:* God can create himself and be his own explanation for his existence, but nothing else can, however illogical this may seem.
No, God is not created. Eternity doesn't have a beginning or an end.
quote:* God can break the laws of physics, but nothing else can.
The 'laws' of physics are still hotly debated. Classical physics vs general relativity. You need to brush up here.
quote:* Belief in God should be without high standards of evidence, but belief in other things needs evidence
That's not true either. Jesus said if you don't have faith, believe on God because of the works that were done before their very eyes.
So no, Christianity isn't as wishy washy as you would like to make out.
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by Don Atkinson
quote:I once contradicted a general in front of his staff when I was a lowly subaltan
quote:Buddhist meditation for example works directly on these deeper levels of mind and offer peerless techniques for dismantling the ‘I’ until the mind becomes so refined in its ability to experience its ultimate nature that it does so spontaneously and permanently and is the nature of bliss and ultimate truth and pervades the whole of space all of which one won’t get standing in church once a week singing ‘All things bright and beautifull’.
Acad,
Its a real pity that you didn't join this forum sooner.
About a month before you joined we had another member, Erik Scothron - who disgraced himself and obviously felt obliged to leave - who was also a Buddhist and some sort of ex army officer. I am sure that you and he would have got on like a house on fire.
Although I'm not sure that the forum could have ever coped with both of you together!!!!!
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by acad tsunami
quote:Originally posted by joe90:
[QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Actually God's cause is to save HIS people from their sins (that's in Matthew)
If one uses the moronic argument that if there is a creation then there must be a creator then one can extend the 'logic' to God and ask who created God? If God is perfect and and the essence of love and all there is God then God can only replicate himself and love - he can not create anything other than himself as to do so is to create something from nothing which is clearly not possible. So whence comes evil? Why would a perfect being decide to create imperfect beings just so he can save them? Was he Bored? You have not understood the use of the word 'cause' in my original post. There is no such thing as a first cause and thus God can not cause himself.
quote:Actually Paul said we should strive and exhort with all longsuffering and search the scriptures (i.e. study the Word of God)
You have not understood the use of the word 'analysis' in my original post.
quote:The Bible explains the reasons for his existance very well - he wishes to be a Father and a Saviour etc etc
Yes, yes, it is quite clear that God somehow felt bored or that his perfect existence somehow lacked something so he created the universe and everything in it so he wouldn't feel alone anymore.
quote:If you mean your 'logic' that man tansmuted from a monkey or some such 'theory' (and I emphasise the word 'theory' here, eve though it's taught as a law)
I have not said so. I have not said anything even remotely similar on this thread or any other. I do not believe in Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection and I am on record as saying so. It is clear you do not understand the use of the word 'logic' in my original post.
quote:No, God is not created. Eternity doesn't have a beginning or an end.
So God has existed for all time (which includes an eternity before the universe was created)and then all of a sudden changes his mind and decides he does not like being perfect and alone and creates the universe and then billions of years later creates Adam and Eve....come off it - this is pure nonsense.
quote:The 'laws' of physics are still hotly debated. Classical physics vs general relativity. You need to brush up here.
Hardly. It is generally accepted that both classical and quantum mechanics are incomplete theories but this does not alter the fact the only way the God mongers can get round the fact the God does not exist is by moving the goal posts right off the established field of common sense, reason and logic that governs the thinking of rational people.
quote:That's not true either. Jesus said if you don't have faith, believe on God because of the works that were done before their very eyes.
So no, Christianity isn't as wishy washy as you would like to make out.
Yes it is. When I was at school I was taught that belief in unicorns was silly as there was no proof. Likewise there is no proof that Jesus was the son of God or that god exists or that jesus performed miracles. None. If I went about banging on about my belief in unicorns because I had read about them in an old book I would be locked up.
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by acad tsunami
quote:Originally posted by Don Atkinson:
[QUOTE]
who disgraced himself and obviously felt obliged to leave - who was also a Buddhist and some sort of ex army officer.
If it is so 'obvious' to you then one wonders why you are so very wrong.

Posted on: 13 March 2007 by acad tsunami
quote:Originally posted by Deane F:
[QUOTE]
What I don't like too much about them is the focus on a spiritual leader - (google "Baal Shem Tov").
Yes, I think that this is the hardest thing to accept. Choosing a spiritual guide is fraught with many dangers.
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by Don Atkinson
quote:If it is so 'obvious' to you then one wonders why you are so very wrong.
Oh, I think I can cope with being "so very wrong" on this occasion.
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by acad tsunami
quote:Originally posted by Don Atkinson:quote:If it is so 'obvious' to you then one wonders why you are so very wrong.
Oh, I think I can cope with being "so very wrong" on this occasion.
Cheers
Don
Yes, you should be getting used to it by now

Posted on: 13 March 2007 by Don Atkinson
quote:Yes, you should be getting used to it by now
Nothing to get used to. One-offs like that one are no bother - in fact, a real pleasure.
....but you'll just have to take my word on that, since you don't have this sort of personal experience yourself.....

Cheers
Don
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by acad tsunami
quote:Originally posted by Deane F:
[QUOTE] Very happy people if my personal contacts with them are anything to go by. What I don't like too much about them is the focus on a spiritual leader - (google "Baal Shem Tov").
Deane,
Are the hassidim the same as the Baal Shem Tov folk or are the Baal Shem Tov lot a sect? I have never heard of them - I have a lot of jewish friends but none are 'religious' (as far as I know). I had a look at the website - they seem harmless enough - is this the lot that you thought not to get involved with? Did you have a bash at it or just sniff around and decide it was not for you? I am interested in the Kabbalah (the real Kabbalah - not the loonies Madonna is mixed up with)but it is difficult to find authentic teachings. My understanding is the Kabbalah teachings were a strict secret and were only passed on to the very best scholars but I found a book which claimed to detail the authentic teachings and it all looked very interesting - I wish I had bought it but now I can't remember what it was called - any ideas?
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by acad tsunami
quote:Originally posted by Don Atkinson:quote:Yes, you should be getting used to it by now
Nothing to get used to. One-offs like that one are no bother - in fact, a real pleasure.
....but you'll just have to take my word on that, since you don't have this sort of personal experience yourself.....
Cheers
Don
LOL - I did think I was wrong once but it turned out I was mistaken er....
Don, I always enjoy your post in the hi-fi room and defer to your expertise there - you are one of the most informed and consistent posters there but here in the rubber room I beg to differ on a number of issues but if we all thought alike what a boring place this would be! Like Deane you make a valuable contribution here and this ere forum would be the poorer without you (but I can't wait to contradict you on something - anything - I just can't help it

Posted on: 13 March 2007 by Deane F
Hi Acad
I sent you an email (using address in your profile). Quite happy to discuss my spiritual life in more detail - offline.
(The) Baal Shem Tov was a Russian Rabbi (Yisrael Ben Elizer ?) who lived in the 1700s.
Deane
I sent you an email (using address in your profile). Quite happy to discuss my spiritual life in more detail - offline.
(The) Baal Shem Tov was a Russian Rabbi (Yisrael Ben Elizer ?) who lived in the 1700s.
Deane
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by acad tsunami
Okidoki
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by Don Atkinson
quote:here in the rubber room I beg to differ on a number of issues but if we all thought alike what a boring place this would be!
Not much chance of getting bored in here...........
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by acad tsunami
quote:Originally posted by Don Atkinson:
[QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
Not much chance of getting bored in here...........
I disagree. (I told you I couldn't wait - I feel better now

Posted on: 13 March 2007 by Don Atkinson
quote:I told you I couldn't wait - I feel better now
You sound relieved....
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by acad tsunami
just joshing
Posted on: 13 March 2007 by Don Atkinson
Now don't go looking that word up in the Urban Dictionary - you might go blind.............
Cheers
Don
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 14 March 2007 by Macker
Must God be a something ? can he not be simply a symbol or an ideal, something or someone to strive to understand or follow his teachings...
After all God seems to be many things to many people...a bit like Hifi really
After all God seems to be many things to many people...a bit like Hifi really

Posted on: 15 March 2007 by Nigel Cavendish
Macker
you seem to advocating that Man creates God: the Bible bashers will soon point out your error...
you seem to advocating that Man creates God: the Bible bashers will soon point out your error...
Posted on: 15 March 2007 by Don Atkinson
quote:you seem to advocating that Man creates God: the Bible bashers will soon point out your error...
Not just the biblebashers. (I presume you mean people who shove the bible down our throats at every opportunity)
Those with open, inquisitive and creative minds as well. (most scientists/engineers/accountants seem to need creative minds)
The populations of these two groups (biblebashers and intelligent people) might overlap slightly.
Cheers
Don
Posted on: 15 March 2007 by Nigel Cavendish
I meant those who believe in (the Christian) God...
Posted on: 15 March 2007 by u5227470736789439
Why would anyone believe in the Judeo/Christian God?
See pages six and seven, for why one might reasonably doubt it for moral reasons, let alone spiritual...
Fredrik
See pages six and seven, for why one might reasonably doubt it for moral reasons, let alone spiritual...
Fredrik