Tuning In Baroque Times

Posted by: u5227470736789439 on 03 April 2006

Dear Friends,

In another Thread a question was posed which I answered thus:. [It is too thought provoking to leave buried as an answer in a Thread that was only obliquely related in some ways, so I apologise if no one is interested, but hope this may get a few views, and even a discussion going. Fredrik].
____________________

Baroque Pitch is not quite fixed in the way of modern Pitch, which is normally established at A = 440 Hz.

In fact there are two regular Baroque Pitches, but you would never guess that from modern recording using 'Baroque' Pitch. Chorton, and Kammerton. Chorton is higher than modern pitch and Kammerton is lower. They are basically a tone apart, and Kammerton is usually about a semi-tone flat of modern pitch. Pitches used for Kammerton vary from roughly A = 407 Hz to 435 Hz, and are typical taken as being at 415 Hz for Bach's time and often at 435 for later pre-classical music. The Organ in Bach's time was tuned to Chorton, which required the player to use a transposition if he was to accompany a Baroque Orchestra, as the wind instruments would never be able to tune up a whole tone, and be in tune at all, as the absolute lengths for the tuninng holes would be wrong. A wind instrument is fundamentally built for the pitch it can play in tune. With stringed instruments it would produce many snapped strings!

Chorton is self-explanitary, being the pitch of Choirs, and Organs. But Organs are notoriously variable as to precisie pitch, as every re-tuning makes them go sharper, because the ends of the pipes are shortened each re-tuning! Thus a full rebuild will also involve retuning to a chosen standard pitch, by lengthening all the pipes again! Even the time of year will affect the pitch as the change in pipes' actual length with different ambient conditions will be enough to produce a discernable change in it to those with sensistive ears.

Then we might consider that even Bach's Well Tempered Clavier was written for a tuning scheme that was not (it is now believed) exactly what we have on the modern piano but a different compromise. It must be remembered that ALL conventional keyboards are fundamentally out of tune! Using them to accurately correct sung notes is not possible for example. Correctly the tuning chord at the begining of a piece should only be a single note, from which the choir can pitch its own relative first notes with accuracy!

The note C Sharp in A major (the major third above the Tonic, and never in tune in any scheme of keyboard tuning) is actually a different note to D flat in A flat major (which should be a perfect Fourth but actually only pitched as such in just intonation), but it is represented by only one key in a keyboard.

As for Baroque intruments being less easy to play in tune, there is a good deal in this. Gut strings are quite unstable in some atmospheric conditions, and the woodwind instruments were quite treacherous, on certain notes, to get exactly the correct tuning, but there is no more excuse for out of tune playing on old instruments (or copies) than any other type, but we must be aware that if you have a perfect pitch for example that the variety of pitches used and choice of correct (in terms of HIP) tuning schemes used for keyboards, may cause some listeners to consider the result ill-tuned, even if the actual tuning is fine enough.

One example of this can be a continuo cello adjusting his tuning to match a harpsichord, away from the "just intonation" we recognise as perfect, and which all string players use as well as choirs, towards the modified temperament of the keyboard, and of course there are any number of schemes for tuning Baroque keyboards, let alone our modern scheme! Poor tuning is by no means the preserve of Baroque performance practice, for all that.
____________________

Busoni had something to say about keyboard tuning.

He said that the human ear has a remarkable ability to perceive what is meant, rather what actually happens, and thus a keyboard in isolation will sound adequately in tune even in mean temperament.

The ear corrects the intervals, naturally. The problem arrises when there is a keyboard playing with other natural instruments or voices, where the nature of the intonation is always an artistic compromise!

In Baroque times some of the tuning schemes were beautifully in tune but only in one key, and acceptable in a handful of related keys. For anyone truly interested in this try looking out for Silbermann's Wolf, which descibes the phenomenon of the Wolf notes on the old tuning schemes on keyboards, most horribly apparent in the key of B Minor! Bach and Silbermann fell out very seriously about this, even then archaic, scheme that Silbermann used for his Organs, whilst Bach wanted to be able to use a much wider range of keys than the old scheme allowed to sound reasonable. For those who consider Bach a consolidator and reactionary, the evidense on his approach to keyboard writing shows he was capable of considerable revolutionary tendencies! He virtually set the conditions for our modern even temperament on keyboards, and set out to do so with Well Tempered Clavier.

All the best from Fredrik
Posted on: 04 April 2006 by u5227470736789439
I have had it pointed out that the actual mechanics of tuning some organ pipes are not just as I stated. I have tuned many times against organs, but never tuned one! I am grtaeful that someone with expertise in that particular area was able to point out that some pipes are more easily adjustable than others!

Fredrik
Posted on: 04 April 2006 by u5227470736789439
quote:
Originally posted by Fredrik_Fiske:
Dear Friends,

[...].

Busoni had something to say about keyboard tuning.

He said that the human ear has a remarkable ability to perceive what is meant, rather what actually happens, and thus a keyboard in isolation will sound adequately in tune even in mean temperament.

[...].

All the best from Fredrik


I apologise for the mistake here. I should have written the last sentence quoted ending as:

... will sound adequately in tune even in EVEN temperament.

Even temperament is the modern Scheme of Tuning keyboards, though many organs still use older schemes.

I tried to edit this, but was too slow. Sorry if this misled anyone.

All the best from Fredrik
Posted on: 04 April 2006 by bhazen
Fredrik -

Thank you so much for your extensive replies to my original thread...I listened to some Corelli and Handel today and you know what? I enjoyed it even more!

Cheers
Bruce
Posted on: 05 April 2006 by u5227470736789439
Dear Bruce,

That is the point! Thanks for replying!

All the best from Fredrik
Posted on: 05 April 2006 by cider glider
Slightly off-topic...

Why is it that the French horn almost always sounds sourly tuned to my ears? Is it because it's so very difficult to play, or is there some other reason?

(BTW I'm referring here to a modern French horn.)

Mark S
Posted on: 05 April 2006 by u5227470736789439
Dear Mark,

There is no excuse for sour tuning. I can think of any number of cases of exemplary Horn playing, but even today there are times when the difficulty of the instrument still lead to practical problems both dynamic and concerning intonation.

I think we tend to accept the standard that pertains, and in many ways technique has improved in all departements, with the (in my opinion) exception of the string band, where the decline in the amount of classical music (as opposed to romantic) has lead to a projected style necessary to balance the modern very loud, broad-bore brass and horns now in vogue.

The result is a loss of poise, and 'precision as to a beautiful and expressive sonority,' which ultimately is still a technical question, when viewed from the performer's perspective. Some of the best string playing ever was achieved in london (especially in the Philharmonia) between say 1950 and 1960. A short study of comparitive performances will soon convince you that I am not inventing this. Even Beecham bemoaned the declining standard of string playing in orchestras towards the end of his life.

Fredrik
Posted on: 06 April 2006 by cider glider
Frederik,

Thanks for your reply. Listening to Brahms' Horn Trio yesterday, it struck me that "sour" was perhaps the wrong word to use. It seems that the French horn's notes are more ambiguous than those of other instruments, perhaps because of the way it generates the harmonics of the fundamental frequency.

Mark S
Posted on: 06 April 2006 by u5227470736789439
Dear Mark,

You have picked up on an almost special case. The piano has its problems as indicated above, as the other (just intonation) instruments, here the violin and horn have to accomodate the even temperament of the piano, and this is much easier for a violin than a horn in the chamber setting! The set with Adolf Busch (violin), Aubrey Brain (horn), and Rudolf Serkin (piano), done for HMV in the '30s [currently on Testament], almost solves the problems, but the compromises are keenly felt in this work in any performance, and maybe that explains its relative unpopularity beside the Clarinet Quintet.

All the best form Fredrik
Posted on: 07 April 2006 by kevj
Mark,

As Fredrik has said, there is no intrinsic reason for playing out of tune on the horn. The thing which most often happens is the 'split' note,where because the harmonics are so very close together, the player misses the intended harmonic and instead gets a different (wrong) one. If this happens too often, the performance starts to sound like the Gunfight at the OK Corral.

Indeed, in the middle register, the player has a great deal of influence on the pitch of the note, which can be altered by opening or closing the hand in the bell which either sharpens or flattens the note respectively.

Which recording of the Trio were you listening to? The 1934 Aubrey Brain, Adolf Busch and Rudolf Serkin (mentioned by Fredrik)is the best, but I'd be curious to know which one has caused you to wince........


Kevin