Speaker cable

Posted by: Lee on 24 October 2003

Any comments on this from the New Scientist's feedback section? Are expensive cables just a great big con?

http://www.newscientist.com/opinion/opfeedback.jsp?id=ns241899


AT THE UK's annual hi-fi show, held recently in two hotels at London's Heathrow airport, several exhibitors were selling exotic cables to connect amplifiers to loudspeakers. The price of these cables was staggering. A 6-metre length of oxygen-free copper could cost as much as £30,000 - and no, those four zeros are not a misprint.

We cannot comment on whether these cables really do make music sound better, because none of the exhibitors offered a controlled blind test - switching the same music between cheap and expensive cables without the listener knowing which was which.

But now that the show is over, we can reveal a secret.

One of the most popular demonstrations at the show was staged by British company Quad, to mark 50 years of making its world-famous hi-fi equipment. Recording engineer Tony Faulkner demonstrated Quad's latest loudspeakers. He explained how he used them to monitor the sound while making a recording of Saint-Saëns's complete works for piano and orchestra, which recently won the coveted Record of the Year award from Gramophone magazine.

As hi-fi buffs enthused over the sound, we spotted that the speakers were connected by some orange wires that looked strangely familiar.

"Yes, they would look familiar if you have a garden", Faulkner told us. "Before the show opened we went over the road to the DIY superstore and bought one of those £20 extension leads that Black & Decker sells for electric hedge-cutters. They are made from good, thick copper wire, look nice and sound good to me. The show's been running for three days and no one in the audience has noticed".
Posted on: 24 October 2003 by Nime
I think the point is that potentially almost anything works better than any other cable. Solid, multistrand, silver, copper, insulation, spacing, cross section and even weave are all modifiable variables.
That a set of speaker cables can cost £30K I find faintly obscene in a world where a whole brand new mini sub costs only £0.5M! Do they hire those £700 an hour escort girls (mentioned in the same news bulletin) to make the stuff? Big Grin

Nime

Everyone has the right to be wrong.
Posted on: 24 October 2003 by Mr_Sukebe
This opening thread was also posted on the zerogain forums, so I'll add the same answer.

The cable in question was actually the power lead for the ESLs, and most certainly NOT speaker cable. Typical journalistic license.
Posted on: 24 October 2003 by Richard Dane
quote:
Originally posted by Lee:
One of the most popular demonstrations at the show was staged by British company Quad, to mark 50 years of making its world-famous hi-fi equipment. Recording engineer Tony Faulkner demonstrated Quad's latest loudspeakers. He explained how he used them to monitor the sound while making a recording of Saint-Saëns's complete works for piano and orchestra, which recently won the coveted Record of the Year award from Gramophone magazine.

As hi-fi buffs enthused over the sound, we spotted that the speakers were connected by some orange wires that looked strangely familiar.

"Yes, they would look familiar if you have a garden", Faulkner told us. "Before the show opened we went over the road to the DIY superstore and bought one of those £20 extension leads that Black & Decker sells for electric hedge-cutters. They are made from good, thick copper wire, look nice and sound good to me. The show's been running for three days and no one in the audience has noticed".


Lee,

If the speakers were Quad Electrostatics, maybe the mains leads were in fact just that, providing a 230V supply to the ESLs.

Richard