Another chance to commune with Kylie
Posted by: Geoff P on 28 November 2003
She's on again tonight to help the BBC celebrate it's all new 1 hour TOTP on Beeb 1 @ 7.
GEOFF
GEOFF
Posted on: 28 November 2003 by Tim Jones
No! Enough! Put your arse away woman!
The combination of this pixie paragon of the pointless celbrity cult with a pointless and obsolete teenage television programme holds no joy for me.
Tim
The combination of this pixie paragon of the pointless celbrity cult with a pointless and obsolete teenage television programme holds no joy for me.
Tim
Posted on: 28 November 2003 by Not For Me
Tim,
Do you have no joy in your life?
The papers have been reporting that Kylie has in fact retired her arse.
You can still catch it on her No.1 bestseller 2004 calendar though.
(I missed the new TOTP though - Any cop?)
DS
ITC - V/A - Burial Mix - The Versions
Do you have no joy in your life?

The papers have been reporting that Kylie has in fact retired her arse.
You can still catch it on her No.1 bestseller 2004 calendar though.
(I missed the new TOTP though - Any cop?)
DS
ITC - V/A - Burial Mix - The Versions
Posted on: 28 November 2003 by Geoff P
Well sort of. She came on in a very short pants suit, confirming she's got legs all the way up to the item you were referring to.
Posted on: 01 December 2003 by garyi
Jesus christ Alan, if you are anything over the age of 30 then you are a pervert.
Posted on: 01 December 2003 by Minky
Or me. I'd stoke Kylie's fire AND look at her mantle at the same time. *
* Special conditions apply :
This offer is dependent on poker-stoking angle and a professional application of lighting, makeup and airbrushwork to mantle of said no-talent prima donna.
* Special conditions apply :
This offer is dependent on poker-stoking angle and a professional application of lighting, makeup and airbrushwork to mantle of said no-talent prima donna.
Posted on: 02 December 2003 by Dave J
quote:
"You don't look at the mantle piece when you're stoking the fire"
Tom
Ah yes, Tom. That's all very well but what if you're stoking the mantle piece.
Posted on: 02 December 2003 by Tim Jones
Tom -
Bagsies the bottom half.
Tim
Bagsies the bottom half.

Tim
Posted on: 02 December 2003 by matthewr
Kylie is arguably less of a Gay icon since she became the ubquitous lust object of middle-aged suburban men.
She was much more of a traditional gay icon during her wilderness years when she had the appropriate whiff of tragedy and unhappiness.
Certainly she is no longer gAy-List like Liza Minelli, Bet Gilroy and Jonny Wilkinson.
Matthew
[This message was edited by Matthew Robinson on TUESDAY 02 December 2003 at 15:04.]
She was much more of a traditional gay icon during her wilderness years when she had the appropriate whiff of tragedy and unhappiness.
Certainly she is no longer gAy-List like Liza Minelli, Bet Gilroy and Jonny Wilkinson.
Matthew
[This message was edited by Matthew Robinson on TUESDAY 02 December 2003 at 15:04.]
Posted on: 02 December 2003 by Tim Jones
Matthew -
Hang on, what's Jonny's "whiff of targedy and unhappiness" then?
Tim
Hang on, what's Jonny's "whiff of targedy and unhappiness" then?
Tim
Posted on: 02 December 2003 by matthewr
Tim,
My friend Patrick claims Jonny is an obvious closet gayer even if he doesn't know it yet. Apparently all this talk of "wishes to maintain his current lifestyle" stuff is code.
Mind you Patrick says much the same about Freddie Lunberg so I'm not sure how much credence we should give to this theory.
Matthew
My friend Patrick claims Jonny is an obvious closet gayer even if he doesn't know it yet. Apparently all this talk of "wishes to maintain his current lifestyle" stuff is code.
Mind you Patrick says much the same about Freddie Lunberg so I'm not sure how much credence we should give to this theory.
Matthew
Posted on: 02 December 2003 by garyi
I just don't get it I thought every one fancied Kylie!
God god I wouldn't last long.
God god I wouldn't last long.
Posted on: 02 December 2003 by Tim Jones
Actually, a friend told me this (believing it to be true) just before the France match.
Having been forced to play Rugby as a child I think it is a closet gayer sport anyhow, and was delighted by the news that Jonny's sexuality might be undoing a whole world of assumptions.
How very disappointing to discover the existence of his charming girlfriend.
Tim
[This message was edited by Tim Jones on TUESDAY 02 December 2003 at 18:08.]
Having been forced to play Rugby as a child I think it is a closet gayer sport anyhow, and was delighted by the news that Jonny's sexuality might be undoing a whole world of assumptions.
How very disappointing to discover the existence of his charming girlfriend.
Tim
[This message was edited by Tim Jones on TUESDAY 02 December 2003 at 18:08.]
Posted on: 02 December 2003 by matthewr
Pah! She's obviously a beard.
Matthew
Matthew
Posted on: 03 December 2003 by Kevin-W
I just don't get it I thought every one fancied Kylie!
Well, I just don't fancy her.
Whenever I think Kyllie, I just think of a midget with big teeth and an '80s perm walking down the aisle with Jason "not a gayer" Donovan. Her arse isn't anything to write home about either.
I'm much more of an Uma Thurman man meself (even if her feet are rather gnarled).
So there.
Kevin
Well, I just don't fancy her.
Whenever I think Kyllie, I just think of a midget with big teeth and an '80s perm walking down the aisle with Jason "not a gayer" Donovan. Her arse isn't anything to write home about either.
I'm much more of an Uma Thurman man meself (even if her feet are rather gnarled).
So there.
Kevin
Posted on: 03 December 2003 by Tim Jones
Kevin -
My heart also belongs to Uma. She is the anti-Kylie.
And she will be mine. Oh yes!
Tim
My heart also belongs to Uma. She is the anti-Kylie.
And she will be mine. Oh yes!
Tim
Posted on: 04 December 2003 by Kevin-W
Tom
You cannot have both. They are mutually exclusive entities. You are either for Uma or for Kylie (as a rule, perpetual adolescents favour Kylie, mature intellectual men like Uma).
There can be no fence-sitting on this matter. You have to choose.
Now which is it to be?
Kevin
You cannot have both. They are mutually exclusive entities. You are either for Uma or for Kylie (as a rule, perpetual adolescents favour Kylie, mature intellectual men like Uma).
There can be no fence-sitting on this matter. You have to choose.
Now which is it to be?
Kevin
Posted on: 04 December 2003 by Markus S
quote:
Originally posted by Tom Alves:
Why not have both?
In the strict biblical sense, you mean?
Posted on: 05 December 2003 by Geoff P
Just seen Charlie's Angels 2.
I"m sure you reprobates will love 3L (Lucy Lui in Leather)
Geoff
I"m sure you reprobates will love 3L (Lucy Lui in Leather)
Geoff