AS the first decade of the 21st Century draws to an end...
Posted by: Tarquin Maynard - Portly on 10 December 2009
... how was it for you?
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by Mat Cork
Superb...but I want more.
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by BigH47
OK have another year and 21 days.
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly
1: 2000
2: 2001
3: 2002
4: 2003
5: 2004
6: 2005
7; 2006
8: 2007
9; 2008
10:2009
I am such a smartarse.
2: 2001
3: 2002
4: 2003
5: 2004
6: 2005
7; 2006
8: 2007
9; 2008
10:2009
I am such a smartarse.
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by BigH47
2000 was the last year of the previous millenium actally.
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by shoot6x7
quote:Originally posted by BigH47:
2000 was the last year of the previous millenium actally.
Correct ...
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by rodwsmith
Mathematically correct of course, but millennium has 2 'n's.
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by BigH47
This is the green version.
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by BigH47
quote:Originally posted by shoot6x7:quote:Originally posted by BigH47:
2000 was the last year of the previous millennium actually.
Correct ...
..and actually has a "u" in it too.
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly
quote:Originally posted by BigH47:
2000 was the last year of the previous millenium actally.
The first mimellium started at year zero. If its zero, its the start.
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by winkyincanada
quote:Originally posted by BigH47:
OK have another year and 21 days.
I'm with you on this. The decade ends over a year from now.
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by u5227470736789439
quote:Originally posted by Mike Lacey:quote:Originally posted by BigH47:
2000 was the last year of the previous millenium actally.
The first mimellium started at year zero. If its zero, its the start.
The Romans [unlike the Arabs] had no number for zero.
Thus the years, Anno Domini, conventionally start with the Roman numeral I which equates to 1.
ATB from George
Posted on: 10 December 2009 by Bananahead
Mike is right.
The numbering of years that we currently use wasn't devised until the sixth century. It was based on an estimation of the number of years after some event. And it's not important anyway.
We start at 2000. When a year has passed we have got to 2001. When ten years have passed we get to 2010. 2010 is the start of a new decade. You may not like it, but that is the way it is.
The numbering of years that we currently use wasn't devised until the sixth century. It was based on an estimation of the number of years after some event. And it's not important anyway.
We start at 2000. When a year has passed we have got to 2001. When ten years have passed we get to 2010. 2010 is the start of a new decade. You may not like it, but that is the way it is.
Posted on: 11 December 2009 by rodwsmith
quote:Originally posted by Bananahead:
You may not like it, but that is the way it is.
This can be argued almost endlessly, but I don't agree.
If you count 'to 10' you include 10.
No child given the request 'count to 10' would start at 0 and end with 9, even though there may be a logic to that.
Irrespective of how counter-intuitive this whole millennium/decade thing may seem, the year 2010 should be considered part of the first decade, as there was not a year zero (if there had been a year zero then there would also need to be a year -zero)
But it doesn't really matter - I imagine we can agree on that...
Posted on: 11 December 2009 by Bob McC
What's a mimellium?
Posted on: 11 December 2009 by Mat Cork
Mine goes to 11
Posted on: 11 December 2009 by Polarbear
How was it for me?
Pretty poor, I lost both parents, some very good friends, got involved in a bad relationship and then split up.
Financially I had good years and bad, the last being the hardest I have ever known. I do finish the decade in a very happy position. Financially I may be on my knees but I am still here. I found a wonderful partner and am looking to 31st December when I can write of the year and start again.
I am happy and healthy and can't ask for anything more.
Regards
PB
Pretty poor, I lost both parents, some very good friends, got involved in a bad relationship and then split up.
Financially I had good years and bad, the last being the hardest I have ever known. I do finish the decade in a very happy position. Financially I may be on my knees but I am still here. I found a wonderful partner and am looking to 31st December when I can write of the year and start again.
I am happy and healthy and can't ask for anything more.
Regards
PB
Posted on: 11 December 2009 by Chris Kelly
Interesting covers it I think!
Married to a wonderful new wife. Working in the toyshop now but earning in a year what I used to earn in a good month, proving that money isn't everything.
Stupidly happy, passably healthy so no complaints here!
Married to a wonderful new wife. Working in the toyshop now but earning in a year what I used to earn in a good month, proving that money isn't everything.
Stupidly happy, passably healthy so no complaints here!
Posted on: 13 December 2009 by Bananahead
quote:Originally posted by rodwsmith:
If you count 'to 10' you include 10.
No child given the request 'count to 10' would start at 0 and end with 9, even though there may be a logic to that.
...
But if you were to ask a child born on 1st Jan 2000 how old they are, they would say "10 in 18 days time"

Posted on: 13 December 2009 by Chillkram
A decade where I moved into my 40s, saw my children grow from toddlers into beautiful young people, got promoted to Director, re-discovered hifi, met some great friends on here and saw England win the World Cup and the Ashes twice!
Not bad!
Not bad!
Posted on: 13 December 2009 by Bhoyo
quote:Originally posted by Bananahead:
But if you were to ask a child born on 1st Jan 2000 how old they are, they would say "10 in 18 days time"![]()
An English peculiarity, that "days (or years/hours etc) time" thing. My kids would say "in 18 days."

Posted on: 14 December 2009 by BigH47
18 days time is actually redundant speech, as day(s) automatically says it is time, as day(s) is only a time measurement.
Also Americans say 2 thousand, 10 we say 2 thousand and ten, amongst many other things we differ on.
Also Americans say 2 thousand, 10 we say 2 thousand and ten, amongst many other things we differ on.
Posted on: 14 December 2009 by living in lancs yearning for yorks
quote:No child given the request 'count to 10' would start at 0 and end with 9, even though there may be a logic to that.
[I kind of agree with what you're saying but,] strictly (which seems largely to be the point here

Posted on: 14 December 2009 by rodwsmith
quote:Originally posted by living in lancs yearning for yorks:
[I kind of agree with what you're saying but,] strictly (which seems largely to be the point here), no child, adult or anything in between would end at "9" if told to count to "10" (yours, smart arsedly...)
That being the point.
If you include '10' in the first lot of '10's, then the decade still has one year and 17 days to go, which was the point someone made earlier in the thread.
Posted on: 14 December 2009 by BigH47

Posted on: 14 December 2009 by Ian Hughes
Company went bankrupt. After 17 years service, I lost my job, the shares I bought with my own money as part of a company savings scheme are worthless, and my pension is in jeopardy. It took 225 applications to get another job.
HOWEVER - at the risk of sounding smug, which honestly I'm not trying to do
I am healthy, have a lovely wife, my parents (after some small scares) are still alive and well, and I'm looking forward to spending Christmas with my family.
Money is not everything, peace of mind is more precious.
HOWEVER - at the risk of sounding smug, which honestly I'm not trying to do
I am healthy, have a lovely wife, my parents (after some small scares) are still alive and well, and I'm looking forward to spending Christmas with my family.
Money is not everything, peace of mind is more precious.