Where's Munch ?

Maybe due to the fact that hes been banned for being a naughty boy......again !
LET HIM BACK I SAY

How man times is that now?

quote:

Originally posted by scottyhammer:
Maybe due to the fact that hes been banned for being a naughty boy......again !
LET HIM BACK I SAY

Me too!

Is it true though? No.....

what did he do (without going into too much detail)?

Perhaps it was the suggestion to some fellow of a power cable insertion where the sun doesn't shine that did it?

But if you read the fellow's posts you can see why.

It was only a matter of time before someone let him have a broadside.

I think it was quite mild considering the provocation.

If indeed my surmise is correct and Munch is not simply on holiday?

Alpha Orionis, Alpha Orionis, Alpha Orionis!

+1 what Allen said.

Did I miss something...? Replied to Stu's Kent Event thread, checked back a few days later - no thread, no Stu?

Ah i didn't know that - yes definetly get him back. I like reading Stu's observations

it must have been pretty bad to get banned (if he has) they would usually just delete the post,come on what was it what happened??

Hopefully Richard will be along soon to provide the official explaination.

I think immense frustration caused Stu's downfall [which I totally understand and feel similarly] and I hope we see him back sometime soon.

J

Mongo is correct but if Stu had not said it then it was only a matter of time before someone else did.

SAID WHAT??

quote:

Originally posted by 151:
SAID WHAT??

Read mongos 2nd post

[We want] Justice for the Ashford One!

Chris

quote:

Originally posted by scottyhammer:
Mongo is correct but if Stu had not said it then it was only a matter of time before someone else did.

Exactly

He even drinks his coffee from a Naim mug!

Come on, you know I would never discuss moderation details of individual members of this forum in public. Moderation matters are strictly between myself, Naim and the member in question.

Speculation is also unfair and unhelpful as only Munch and the Naim moderators know the full facts here.

However, in the interests of quelling the possibility of innacurate rumour, I can confirm that Munch has left the Naim forum. This was arrived at amicably and by mutual agreement. There are no hard feelings on either side and we wish him well.

quote:

Originally posted by Julian H:

quote:

Originally posted by 151:
SAID WHAT??

Read mongos 2nd post

there must be more to it than that.

quote:

I can confirm that Munch has left the Naim forum.

oh dear. Not a good omen imho.

I would imagine that in terms of fair play (ie Munch isn't able to respond), the commentry by "the fellow in question" will be promptly removed.

cheers

Don

Ali

Do us all a favour and do not contribute to this thread.

Exactly so, Don.

If this is true, it's a sad day indeed and this forum will be a poorer place.

I suspect there'll be a few of us who'll quietly drift away.

Ah shit, really...?!?

I nearly replied to that stupid post of Ali-I'm a lathering stupid new puppy dog-Dubai myself, but I guess Stu did it himself (in the small hours ?)....to some effect it seems...!!

So, a forum gathering in Kent....er, without the host being on the forum...? Nooooooooooo !

Have to say, I agree with everything Allen says above....

Steve.

Yes Allen. Of course I'm sure. Not quite sure I understand your question though.

Please re-read. Especially this part: Speculation is also unfair and unhelpful as only Munch and the Naim moderators know the full facts here.