CD 3.5 & Flatcap - is it dim or me?

Posted by: Stephen Bennett on 16 November 2001

Hi all

I've finally found a Flatcap to partner my CD 3.5. Soundwise It's promising, giving more weight and authority to the CD as well as smoothing out the highs. Not as exciting to listen to (or 'edgy') as the CD alone, but better in the long run I feel.

However, the Naim logo on my CD 3.5 has gone from bright to dim - noticably so next to the other components.

Any idea why?

Regards

Stephen

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Steve B
Sometimes I prefer to be soothed rather than excited.

Mind you sometimes they both go hand in hand smile

Steve B

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by David Dever
quote:
However, the Naim logo on my CD 3.5 has gone from bright to dim - noticably so next to the other components. Any idea why?

Unless there is an actual (electrical) problem with the FLATCAP *, it's possible that it's the fascia itself--the screened black logo overlay's position varies from vintage to vintage; you see this especially on older large-case fascia.

Dave Dever, NANA

* - I'm not referring to the mute circuit / logo thing on the older CD players; could be a bad regulator, on the rare possibility that something might be wrong.

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Stephen Bennett
quote:
"Not as exciting to listen to"
That's why I havn't done it.

Mr Pig


As it feels a lot closer to Juan's CDS2, I'm happy. It still has more PRaT than the Thunder II I borrowed.

Stephen

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Stephen Bennett
quote:
I'm not saying the Flat cap isn't a good idea, I just didn't want to lose something to get something else

Well as long as it's nasties that get lost, surely that's a good thing! Anyhow, I'll choose what's best.

Stephen

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Greg Beatty
David -

I think you misinterpreted Stephen's initial post. He said that the logo *on the 3.5* is dimmer with the flatcap attached than when not. Does this indicate a problem? Voltage difference with the flatcap perhaps?

Stephen -

Sounds like a setup issue to me. The 3.5 is better in *all areas* with a cap fitted. Oh, and excitement from edginess doesn't count wink

- GregB

Insert Witty Signature Line Here

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Stephen Bennett
Greg - yes you are right, it's the Logo on the CD that dims when the flatcap is connected.

You're also right about the sound. Edginess can sound exciting but, like bass, I only want it when it's supposed to be there! The FC removes the overall edginess while retaining the properties that make the 3.5 fun to listen too.

So far anyhow!

Stephen

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by David Dever
I was referring to the CD3.5., though the display board is powered from a separate internal supply.
Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Stephen Bennett
Ah, OK David.

I'm still confused as to why plugging in a Flatcap shouuld make the logo dimmer than with the FC removed though.

Regards

Stephen

PS The high frequencies on Anja Garbereks 'Smiling and waving', which were extremely shrill on the bare 3.5 & unlistenable on my old Arcam are fine now. Hurrah! And the bassoon still sounds like a bassoon. Hurrah!

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by garyi
Mabye the power priority is different in the flatcap to the internal of the cd player, perhaps it routes it ina different way.

Yup you are right I don't have a clue.

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by steveb
Cd3.5 by itself excellent but when i added the flatcap wow!!, I demoed it at home with and without and the response from Elizabeth(Wife) was immediate when the 3.5 was flatcapped "BUY IT" ( other Cd players demoed at home compared to my original Denon DCD 1500 had elicited no response, no noticeable differences), I had played her Somewhere Down The Crazy River by Robbie Robertson, his voice really leapt out with so much depth and atmosphere. I had the same response when I first demoed in the shop.
And yes my logo is also dimmer!
Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Stephen Bennett
Steve, I guess we tend to forget in 'buy a CDX land' that the CD 3.5/flat is still one hell of a CD player that people thought worth the £1500 quid the combo cost new (was it that much?). Used, it's a bargain.

Regards

Stephen

PS Logo dimmer = more music perhaps wink

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by David Stewart
Very interested in the comments in this thread as I was thinking about buying a FlatCap for my CD3.5 - however s/h FlatCaps seem to be about as common as rocking horse droppings - am I right in thinking that a Hi-Cap would do the job as well (or better even)?
more pricey though!

David

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Craig B
When I first brought my new CD3-5 home and plugged it in, its funky green old new style logo seemed so much brighter than that of my only previous Naim box, a later Nait 2, that the two logos even looked a quite different shade of green. The 3-5s logo looked much more yellowish when compared to the Nait's darker electric green.

With a little help from previous postings on this topic, I put it all down to the differences in alignment between the graphics and the dimensional differences between the fascias themselves. I also deduced that the relative ages of the units, and the inevitable parts and specification changes that are to be expected during the passage of time, must play some part.

Well, all that satisfied my obsessive compulsion until...yes...the 3rd of my Naim bits, the Flat-Cap arrived. By comparison to the other 2 units, the Flat's logo was like a star going super nova on the Discouvery Channels mockups. Its shade of Green is much like that of the 3-5 and its serial number is also quite close, as its previous owner (hi Mike) had purchased it new around the same time that I had acquired the 3-5. However, when piled into the Sound Org rack's lowest shelf, it made the two original inhabitants' logos seem similarly dimmer by comparison. I remember having a very Mullet like thought...'hey this thing is powerful man!'

Well one night, after a particularly Mick Parry like single malt experience, I thought that I would relax on the floor in front of my beloved black boxes while listening to a bit of low level, soothing, 'I will survive this' type music (now there is a thread topic starter for the Music Forum if ever there was one...has it been done?).

Well, when this old racing machine decides to head back to the garage after thinking that it is still in its competitive prime, it does so quite reluctantly. Every so often I would open my eyes to check that the listening room had decided to stop rearranging its boundaries in the interests of acoustical experimentation.

Well, lo a behold, my Naim boxes had gone forth and multiplied! Had my wonderful wife gone and bought me a new piece of kit? No way man! The Naim boxes were actually flying!! Not only that but, all of their wonderful little dancing green logos were the exact same shade of wonderful Naim green and of equal lumens. I somehow decided that it would be best to just follow the lights and, alas, I am still here to relate this tale of wonderment.

The moral of this story is, that our Naim boxes are just messing with our heads. Someday they will reveal their true nature to all of us. I have seen the truth, your day will come too. It is just a matter of time. In the meanwhile just go along for the wonderful ride.

Craig
PS. of course another reason might be that, like fine jewelry, it merely depends upon what angle you look at them from. Nah, that can't be it!

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by garyi
Craig, I believe you are on drugs.
Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Happy Listener
Don't know about the dimmer icons but fwiw I found that the flat cap did everything people have said here save Mr P.

There was an article in HFN & RR going back about 2 1/2 years which compared base 3.5,+ Flat-cap and + Hi-cap.

There summary, as was mine, is that stay with FC and then go to CDX. The major gains are with the FC and the HC is a bit pricey for the gain. But be careful, I did't find a bare CDX much better than the 3.5 + FC when auditioned -- the drama and life did not improve as much as I would have expected.

Only trust your own ears!

Phil

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by David Quigley
David Stewart:

I listened to both combos and while the difference is not enourmous it is there. With a Hi-cap IMHO even less of the deviant edginess is present.

Regards, David

Posted on: 16 November 2001 by Craig B
quote:
Craig, I believe you are on drugs.

Sleep deprivation, actually. It's a lot cheaper and after 72 hours a somewhat spiritual experience!

Since losing my virginity in 1974 while listening to the Canadian pressing of PFs DSOTM in a small border town near the state of Michigan, I have never required more than 6 hours of sleep in a given 24 hr period. The only artificial means by which I can sleep soundly for longer periods is if I were to consume a whole pan of Betty Crocker hash brownies, followed by copious copulation, and ultimately crashing in a heap at the foot of my kit. It is then, and only then, that the little Naim Logo Light Fairies carry me off into a long and blissful dream walk from which I awake 'Mick Parry like' remembering nothing of the experience (but, like Mick, wondering how my underwear went missing).

These days I mostly prefer to remain straight and soberly productive for the remaining 18 hours per day. Well at least during the work week.

Craig
Jeopardy Audio Consultants
'Ask us no answers and we will tell you no questions'

Posted on: 17 November 2001 by garyi
Ah, I would put this down to the maggi thatcher effect then, but personally I would rather be accused of taking Class A drugs.