Northpole.

Posted by: u5227470736789439 on 17 June 2007

Sunset at the Nothpole

My Norwegian Aunt sent me this very lovely picture, and I hope its brings pleasure to all who see it...



Good night from Fredrik
Posted on: 17 June 2007 by Ian G.
That is truly a beautiful picture. What I'm assuming is the Moon looks huge (unless it is some funny reflection). Must be closer by up there Winker

Ian
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by u5227470736789439
T'is a thing of beauty.

I wonder if there is artistic manipulation work here, and I'll never know, but I like it! Morning all...

ATB from Fredrik
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by northpole
A veritable home from homes!
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by Ian G.
If you look closely, in the bay just to the right of the Sun, and squint ..



you can just make out, ...



...perhaps ...



...a polarbear!

I thought it had been quiet in here recently Smile
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by Phil Cork
I saw this a few months ago, and whilst it's a lovely picture, unfortunately it's a fake. The sun and moon always look the same size in the sky (hence total eclipses), so there are no circumstances where the moon would look that big... Frown

Phil
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by BigH47
Makes a good desktop background.
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by ryan_d
Phil,
I wouldn't necessarily dismiss it as a fake, but as a tremendous use of post production. Using digital now allows you to alter images or merge segments of other images to startling effect.....but you have to be very competent to do so, as I'm finding out (trying to learn the more intermediate and advanced operations of photoshop! Frown .

I'm also a bit of a purist when it comes to photography in that I prefer to get it the way i want in-camera so to speak, but that does not detract from the obvious beauty that is this picture.

All the best
Ryan
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by Alexander
quote:
Originally posted by Phil Cork:
The sun and moon always look the same size in the sky (hence total eclipses), so there are no circumstances where the moon would look that big... Frown

Phil


Close Smile If you'd be looking through a toilet roll, or if you look at a photograph, the moon and the sun have about the same apparent size , around 30 minutes of arc. The apparent size of the moon varies most, over 10% during the month. The main effect can't be captured on camera because it's due to our minds playing tricks on us: the moon and the sun look much larger when they're near the horizon.
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by Chillkram
quote:
Originally posted by northpole:
A veritable home from homes!


I thought this was a thread about you Peter!
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by Phil Cork
quote:
Originally posted by ryan_d:
Phil,
I wouldn't necessarily dismiss it as a fake, but as a tremendous use of post production. Using digital now allows you to alter images or merge segments of other images to startling effect.....but you have to be very competent to do so, as I'm finding out (trying to learn the more intermediate and advanced operations of photoshop! Frown .

I'm also a bit of a purist when it comes to photography in that I prefer to get it the way i want in-camera so to speak, but that does not detract from the obvious beauty that is this picture.

All the best
Ryan


Understood Ryan, I have a Nikon D200 and use Adobe Photoshop CS2 to edit my photographs. There is a difference however between enhancing photographs that you've taken in order to bring out the best in them, and copying in an element from a completely different picture to create something that is clearly not possible...

This 'picture' has been circulating on the web for some time, and is widely acknowledged as a 'fake'. However, as Fredrik says, it's eyecatching nonetheless.

Phil
Posted on: 18 June 2007 by u5227470736789439
One thing the picture does get right is the slightly oily look to the waves on the water. That is real enough in the Polar areas, when the water is quite calm. I am wondering whether to replace the Bentley Mark Six I currently have on my desk-top!

I think I will for a while...

ATB from Fredrik
Posted on: 28 June 2007 by u5227470736789439
On the other hand there is never a time of year when there is open water at the North Pole! At least not yet!!

ATB from Fredrik
Posted on: 30 June 2007 by ryan_d
Phil,
I agree with yu comletely and as my post hinted at, I'm more inclined to your point of view. But this doesn't detract from the skill required (and I do believe it does require skill) to make a picture of this quality out of how many shots it required.

I, too, would love to see natural shots, but it seems that we are moving away from that, but i'm sure it will come back to the simplicity of a purposefully and skillfully engineered and taken picture. Fashoins are what hey are. But they can still be appreciated.

Al the best

Ryan