Speakers first ! or Maybe we are mind squares ?
Posted by: Arye_Gur on 30 October 2001
Suppose someone asks this question –
I have a cd5/nac112/nap150/intros, I want to upgrade my system, what need I do?
The obvious answers will be – go for a cdx first, we all know that source comes first.
Maybe some answers will be to upgrade the amp, add a Flatcap2 or so – but I think we all know that there will be no recommendation to upgrade the speakers.
I have a cd5/nac112/nap150/intros, I want to upgrade my system, what need I do?
The obvious answers will be – go for a cdx first, we all know that source comes first.
Maybe some answers will be to upgrade the amp, add a Flatcap2 or so – but I think we all know that there will be no recommendation to upgrade the speakers.
Am I right so far?
I have the page from Naim that tells about the allae. Naim recommends that these speakers can work with nac112/nap150 at least.
I guess that the people in Naim are sure (after they did test it) that these speakers are better than the intro and credo for the nac112/nap150. If they are not, it is misleading the potential speakers’ buyer if he owns 112/150 to pay for the speakers more than he has to.
So I think, that when we are thinking about “source first”, maybe we may be wrong in few occasions. How can someone be sure that a cdx/112/150/intro system is better value than a cd5/112/150/allae system?
What do you think?
Arye
PS – please notice that I have no shares in Ayre – my name is Arye, catch my name, please…