Advanced search

Aimez-Vous Brahms?

Posted by: herm on 22 October 2002

I guess this one of those things that only happen to classical music lovers. I have quite a bunch of Brahms symphonies - i.e. there's four Brahms symphonies, obviously, and I own various recordings of these. And yet I'm looking for a new set. Don’t know why, but more importantly, don’t know which.

The way it's been for the last couple of years is my favorite Third is with the Vienna Philharmonic, conducted by Guilini. It's big and expansive and pensive at the same time, as often with CMG, but the orchestra truly plays like a pack of demons and everything is right.

The Fourth I listen to most frequently would be Haitink and the Boston Symphony. I just love that creamy Boston horn, and the finale is well judged. Haitink is a master of restraint and release, and it works well here.

The Second I returned to recently is Bernstein and the Vienna Phil. Unlike his other Brahms recordings, this is one without theatrical sweatdrenched climaxes etc, probably because it's the 'sunny' symphony (with some pretty hefty brass thunderclouds, though). Again, the orchestra is just astounding; there's just nothing like the string tutti towards the end of the 3d mvt, with the bows deep in those rich strings while the celli 'strum' the guitar.

Last week I picked up the Brahms set by Karl Böhm and the Vienna PO, recorded in the mid seventies, and it was a disappointment. Böhm made some good recordings in those sunset years (Mozart and Beethoven Piano Cti with Pollini), but these are not among them. Suddenly I understand why a lot of people think Brahms is hard to enjoy. The orchestral lines (elementary in Brahms and Schumann, if you want to hear what's going on) are smudged and the rythms lack definition. It's just one big burring fuzz.

So I'm wondering whether anybody out there has a some recommendations. I'm wondering, for instance, whether Todd and Ross, our two resident Kubelikians, have a Brahms by this conductor and whether it's special. There is a set with the Bavarians on Orfeo which I might just get.

PS: the funny thing is this restlessness only applies to the symphonies. I have been listening to the same Brahms chamber music recordings for 25 years now, and they're still as exciting as the first time (Beaux Arts Trio, Quartetto Italiano / Amadeus / Tokyo).

Well, long story, sorry, but I'm curious about your responses.

Herman
Posted on: 01 November 2002 by Dan H
I started out on the Brahms symphonies quite fortuitously with No. 1 conducted by Jascha Horenstein, which came free with some dreadful magazine series. The performance is to my taste but the CD transfer is abysmal.

No. 4 I first got on vinyl - Szell and the Cleveland Orch. Also have the same version on CD, but it's not as good of course smile. No. 4 is the one I come back to most; hard to pin down its mood in words, but like 1 definitely sees the darker side of life.

No. 2: I was given a CD of Sir COlin Davis and Bavarian Radio SO. Adequate, fair recording. Too upbeat for me!

No. 3: Sir Adrian Boult/LSO. Would play it more if the CD sounded better.

Then recently I got the boxed set bug. The Chamber Orch. of Europe under Paavo Berglund did a chamber version quite recently that I saw well-reviewed and looked as though it could be interesting. Has anyone heard it? Anyway, in the end I went for Kurt Sanderling and the Staatskapelle Dresden. Fairly solid and middle of the road all round I think. A bit more edge, or alternatively more lyricism, wouldn't go amiss sometimes.

I'm surprised there aren't more takers for these works: they're some of my favourite symphonies full stop (or, indeed, period).
Posted on: 06 November 2002 by herm
Kubelik's Brahms

This is a recording I can fully recommend. It is, as I expected a Brahms that's a little more songful than most conductors do. Most good Brahms is first and foremost focused on keeping the structures clean and clear, to the detriment of melodies. Keeping the textures clear is a rather tough job with Schumann and Brahms, whose scores were much denser than the Beethoven symphonies, often making for a clogged and dour sound.

The interesting thing of the Kubelik is he clearly works with a traditional big orchestral model and yet there's no clogging. The lines are consistently imagined as sung first and rendered by the orchestra in that shape. If a conductor does this there's the risk you're getting the top line first, and the rest is relegated to accompaniment. No risk with Kubelik. Everything crystal clear. It's a win win performance.

The various divisions of the Bavarian Radio Orchestra are wonderfully chacterized: great string playing from left to right, old fashioned wood winds with a little bit of vibrato, and a brass section that adds great drama to the climaxes in the second and third.

This being a 1983 recording (Orfeo) there's digital glare in the upper strings and flutes, unfortunately.

I guess it's time to check out some more Kubelik, like the Dvorak, which I suspect is a little earlier in his career.

Herman
Posted on: 06 November 2002 by Former member
Hi,

I too think Brahms is a masterful composer. I suspect I am not alone when I say that some of us keep quiet because we feel we do not possess a sufficiently rich classical collection to offer a balanced opinion[0]: I only have one copy of his symphonies, for example.

Also, I know that it is rather "unfashionable" and perhaps not considered very sophisticated to recommend Naxos recordings[1], with their budget price, but I feel compelled to recommend the Naxos recordings of Brahms four-hand Piano music. Absolutely sublime music, delivered with terrific Gypsy-inspired rhythmic drive and sweeping melodies. The Naxos version of his Violin Sonatas is also wonderful; the music has moments of incredible beauty.

Meanwhile Vengerov's version of Brahms Violin Concerto on Teldec is also superb; rich and sumptuous in tone and delivered with passion and virtuosity.

John.

[0] My Classical collection is currently only about 200 CDs large.
[1] Naxos recordings are rarely truly bad, usually not poor, many are mediocre, many are reasonably good, a few are excellent, and some are superb (particulary in recent times). Overall you can't really complain, considering their superb value and obvious commitment to making a vast repetoire of music available to listeners.
Posted on: 07 November 2002 by Todd A
quote:
Originally posted by J. A. Toon:

Also, I know that it is rather "unfashionable" and perhaps not considered very sophisticated to recommend Naxos recordings[.]



Nothing wrong with Naxos recordings or recommendations as far as I'm concerned. Some fine artists record or have recorded for Herr Heymann (Georg Tintner, Antoni Wit, Peter Donohoe, John McCabe, Eteri Andjaparidze) and some truly exceptional titles are available. And they are the best deal around in historical recordings. (Try those three new discs of the Casals / Thibaud / Cortot trio, for instance.) Most important is that one tries new music, which is so much easier when the discs are cheap.
Posted on: 11 November 2002 by ClaudeP
Even though I really like Brahms, I don't find that Symphonies are what he composed best.

However, one of my favorite LPs is The Piano Concerto No. 1, Concertgebouw Orchestra, (Hans Schmidt-Isserstedt) and Alfred Brendel. (Philips 6500 623)

(Sorry if this reply is somewhat off-topic).