Happy 60th birthday you frickin' genius!
Posted by: Kevin-W on 14 May 2010
Stevie is 60 today.
If anyone doubts that the man is anything but a complete and utter mindblowing genius, a soul titan, a musical god, and any other number of superlatives, check out this awesome clip!
[URL= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ul7X5js1vE]Stevie on Sesame Street '72[/URL]
Love the kid at 0'40"!
If anyone doubts that the man is anything but a complete and utter mindblowing genius, a soul titan, a musical god, and any other number of superlatives, check out this awesome clip!
[URL= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ul7X5js1vE]Stevie on Sesame Street '72[/URL]
Love the kid at 0'40"!
Posted on: 14 May 2010 by CHP
Good post.
Thanks for the link.
Thanks for the link.

Posted on: 14 May 2010 by Hot Rats
If anyone is up and reading the forum at this crazy hour, Stevie is on BBC4 TV from 1:00 a.m. until 2:00 a.m. Highlights from the O2 gig
Posted on: 14 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by Kevin-W:
Stevie is 60 today.
If anyone doubts that the man is anything but a complete and utter mindblowing genius, a soul titan, a musical god, and any other number of superlatives ...
No one should have a shred of doubt, it's all true!
Man, "Little" Stevie Wonder is 60 ... what a force of nature! I saw a TV broadcast of his fairly recent live show, the only one he's released on DVD, I believe, and it's brilliant. Starts off with his harmonica version of Miles Davis' All Blues ... sublime joy.
Best,
Fred
Posted on: 14 May 2010 by Sniper
I got dragged to a concert of his many years ago - I really did not want to go but I have to say this man won me over big time - a true class act.
Posted on: 15 May 2010 by Mike Hughes
I'm inclined toward the Stephen Fry view that the word "genius" is bandied around in a manner that betrays a lack of understanding of the term with all due respect. One is not a genius. One has a genius. There is a signficant difference.
There is a sequence of Stevie albums as good as the very best in popular music. It is equally true to say that he has produced nothing to equal it in a quarter of a century. His genius has long since left the building.
Mike
There is a sequence of Stevie albums as good as the very best in popular music. It is equally true to say that he has produced nothing to equal it in a quarter of a century. His genius has long since left the building.
Mike
Posted on: 15 May 2010 by fred simon
Mike, I agree that the term "genius" is used too promiscuously, but in the case of Stevie Wonder ... if he isn't a genius, then who?
As regards the semantic issue, perhaps it's different on your side of the water, but every dictionary I check has "genius" as both the talent one possesses, and as the one who possesses that genius. In fact, one dictionary uncannily gives this usage example: "one of the great musical geniuses of the 20th century." All that's missing is a photo of Stevie!
Further, the Latin origin of the word means "attendant spirit present from one's birth, innate ability or inclination," and if that doesn't describe Stevie, I don't know what does.
In all manner of artistic endeavor, or scientific discovery or mechanical invention, genius has often been something that fades over time, but this in no way diminishes the genius of a genius's earlier achievements. In rare cases, genius can span a lifetime, but more often than not it doesn't. I agree that Stevie's best writing is behind him (although his singing genius continues unabated), but so, too, that of Joni Mitchell, Paul McCartney, and many other geniuses whose genius flourished in earlier years.
Best,
Fred
Posted on: 15 May 2010 by Mike Hughes
Hi Fred,
I rather think the definition of "attendant spirit" is exactly what I was referring to. You don't have a genius. It comes and goes from you. It left Stevie a long time ago. Thus the suggestion that Stevie himself is a genius in the presenr tense s misleading and plain inaccurate. He has been possessed of it. He no longer is.
I probably don't need to say that it in no way diminishes that purple patch as I already covered that in my first post
Mike
I rather think the definition of "attendant spirit" is exactly what I was referring to. You don't have a genius. It comes and goes from you. It left Stevie a long time ago. Thus the suggestion that Stevie himself is a genius in the presenr tense s misleading and plain inaccurate. He has been possessed of it. He no longer is.
I probably don't need to say that it in no way diminishes that purple patch as I already covered that in my first post

Mike
Posted on: 16 May 2010 by irwan shah
quote:Originally posted by fred simon:
Mike, I agree that the term "genius" is used too promiscuously, but in the case of Stevie Wonder ... if he isn't a genius, then who?
As regards the semantic issue, perhaps it's different on your side of the water, but every dictionary I check has "genius" as both the talent one possesses, and as the one who possesses that genius. In fact, one dictionary uncannily gives this usage example: "one of the great musical geniuses of the 20th century." All that's missing is a photo of Stevie!
Further, the Latin origin of the word means "attendant spirit present from one's birth, innate ability or inclination," and if that doesn't describe Stevie, I don't know what does.
In all manner of artistic endeavor, or scientific discovery or mechanical invention, genius has often been something that fades over time, but this in no way diminishes the genius of a genius's earlier achievements. In rare cases, genius can span a lifetime, but more often than not it doesn't. I agree that Stevie's best writing is behind him (although his singing genius continues unabated), but so, too, that of Joni Mitchell, Paul McCartney, and many other geniuses whose genius flourished in earlier years.
Best,
Fred
Stevie produced fantastic music in the 1970s and early 1980s. Strangely, the one song that I love after all these years is actually from outside that creative period; 'Overjoyed' from an album in the mid to late 1980s that also gave the world 'Part time Lover'. I still listen to 'Overjoyed' on the black, i.e. 12 inch single. I just like it a lot and cannot explain why!

Posted on: 16 May 2010 by Lontano
When I saw him 18 months ago in concert, there is only one word I could use to describe his performance - genius.
Posted on: 16 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by irwan shah:
Strangely, the one song that I love after all these years is actually from outside that creative period; 'Overjoyed' from an album in the mid to late 1980s that also gave the world 'Part time Lover'. I still listen to 'Overjoyed' on the black, i.e. 12 inch single. I just like it a lot and cannot explain why!Any Stevie fans here who love that song too?
I can explain why: because it's one of the greatest songs ever written!
One of the many aspects of Stevie's genius is that he can pack so much melodic/harmonic interest and sophistication into a seamless, flowing, organic whole. Just the key modulations alone in Overjoyed ... modulation in the hands of an average songwriter usually results in a hackneyed device; in the hands of a genius like Stevie it becomes a sublime musical expression of unbounded emotion.
And you're right, it was written well after his primary heyday, yet it's one of the very best songs he's written.
Posted on: 16 May 2010 by Fozz
Posted on: 17 May 2010 by Geoff C
A Genius doesn't need to be a Genius all his life.
He can play the Drums too!
drum solo
Looking forward to having the live experience of Stevie Wonder at Glastonbury.
Geoff
He can play the Drums too!
drum solo
Looking forward to having the live experience of Stevie Wonder at Glastonbury.
Geoff
Posted on: 17 May 2010 by irwan shah
quote:Originally posted by fred simon:quote:Originally posted by irwan shah:
Strangely, the one song that I love after all these years is actually from outside that creative period; 'Overjoyed' from an album in the mid to late 1980s that also gave the world 'Part time Lover'. I still listen to 'Overjoyed' on the black, i.e. 12 inch single. I just like it a lot and cannot explain why!Any Stevie fans here who love that song too?
I can explain why: because it's one of the greatest songs ever written!
One of the many aspects of Stevie's genius is that he can pack so much melodic/harmonic interest and sophistication into a seamless, flowing, organic whole. Just the key modulations alone in Overjoyed ... modulation in the hands of an average songwriter usually results in a hackneyed device; in the hands of a genius like Stevie it becomes a sublime musical expression of unbounded emotion.
And you're right, it was written well after his primary heyday, yet it's one of the very best songs he's written.
Fred:
It is a deceptively simple song. Modulations like that are common in jazz tunes, but less so in pop songs.
I remember a Stanley Clarke interpretation of the tune where he has Stanley Jordan for company. It's on this album:

It shows what could be done when you put a simple pop tune in the hands of a couple of jazz masters.
Posted on: 17 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by Geoff Cottle:
A Genius doesn't need to be a Genius all his life.
I agree. In fact, very few are.
quote:He can play the Drums too!
Yes! And on Music Of My Mind he played every instrument on the album except for trombone and guitar.
And although I've never heard it, people whose opinions I trust tell me that Stevie sounds great playing harmonica on John Coltrane's Giant Steps.
Posted on: 17 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by irwan shah:quote:Originally posted by fred simon:
One of the many aspects of Stevie's genius is that he can pack so much melodic/harmonic interest and sophistication into a seamless, flowing, organic whole. Just the key modulations alone in Overjoyed ... modulation in the hands of an average songwriter usually results in a hackneyed device; in the hands of a genius like Stevie it becomes a sublime musical expression of unbounded emotion.
Fred:
It is a deceptively simple song. Modulations like that are common in jazz tunes, but less so in pop songs.
Actually, Overjoyed is more of a jazz tune in its harmonic sophistication. The whole-step-up modulation late in the tune is more of a standard pop device, but the harmonic modulations in and around the initial tonal center are more common in jazz ... and Joni Mitchell, Steely Dan, and Stevie.
quote:I remember a Stanley Clarke interpretation of the tune where he has Stanley Jordan for company.
It shows what could be done when you put a simple pop tune in the hands of a couple of jazz masters.
Not to be argumentative, Irwan, but it's really not a simple pop tune, not in its musical nuts and bolts. Of course, Stevie pulls it off with all the ease of a pop song, but there's a lot more going on there than may first meet the ear.
Also, and I recognize that I may be alone in this, I'm not such a big fan of the idea of jazz players "improving" on a pop tune because they may have a more sophisticated musical sensibility ... I'm not at all suggesting that you hold this attitude, but it's long been a prevalent stance in the jazz world that because many pop tunes tend to be less melodically/harmonically advanced than jazz, all too often jazz musicians condescend to play them and throw in all sorts of fancy shit that completely misses the point. And with a pop song like Overjoyed, which already is more advanced than many pop songs, it's even less necessary. But maybe that's just me. (insert emoticon here)
Posted on: 18 May 2010 by irwan shah
quote:Originally posted by fred simon:quote:Originally posted by irwan shah:quote:Originally posted by fred simon:
One of the many aspects of Stevie's genius is that he can pack so much melodic/harmonic interest and sophistication into a seamless, flowing, organic whole. Just the key modulations alone in Overjoyed ... modulation in the hands of an average songwriter usually results in a hackneyed device; in the hands of a genius like Stevie it becomes a sublime musical expression of unbounded emotion.
Fred:
It is a deceptively simple song. Modulations like that are common in jazz tunes, but less so in pop songs.
Actually, Overjoyed is more of a jazz tune in its harmonic sophistication. The whole-step-up modulation late in the tune is more of a standard pop device, but the harmonic modulations in and around the initial tonal center are more common in jazz ... and Joni Mitchell, Steely Dan, and Stevie.quote:I remember a Stanley Clarke interpretation of the tune where he has Stanley Jordan for company.
It shows what could be done when you put a simple pop tune in the hands of a couple of jazz masters.
Not to be argumentative, Irwan, but it's really not a simple pop tune, not in its musical nuts and bolts. Of course, Stevie pulls it off with all the ease of a pop song, but there's a lot more going on there than may first meet the ear.
Also, and I recognize that I may be alone in this, I'm not such a big fan of the idea of jazz players "improving" on a pop tune because they may have a more sophisticated musical sensibility ... I'm not at all suggesting that you hold this attitude, but it's long been a prevalent stance in the jazz world that because many pop tunes tend to be less melodically/harmonically advanced than jazz, all too often jazz musicians condescend to play them and throw in all sorts of fancy shit that completely misses the point. And with a pop song like Overjoyed, which already is more advanced than many pop songs, it's even less necessary. But maybe that's just me. (insert emoticon here)
Interesting. Would that explain why Earth, Wind and Fire songs are so infectious as well?
You're right, in many circumstances, less is more when improvising.
Posted on: 18 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by irwan shah:
Would that explain why Earth, Wind and Fire songs are so infectious as well?
Exactly. Especially a song like After the Love Is Gone. EWF songs are loaded with melodic and harmonic interest, so under the pop sheen there's plenty to sink your teeth into.
In another thread, someone mentioned Weather Report having listened to Genesis, and I'll bet they listened to EWF, too. And EWF clearly listened to Weather Report and Herbie Hancock.
Posted on: 19 May 2010 by mudwolf
I read about Stevie giving a lavish party once, on arrival you ascended a long wide stairs to his front door. He was set up at an organ and someone would tell him who was coming up the stairs and he'd just sing and play and make it all rhyme. George Harrison said "And this is what we have to compete with?" as in no contest.
I loved those 3 albums around the superstition period, Innervision and Talking book I still have.
I loved those 3 albums around the superstition period, Innervision and Talking book I still have.
Posted on: 19 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by mudwolf:
I loved those 3 albums around the superstition period, Innervision and Talking book I still have.
I assume the other of those three is Music Of My Mind, Stevie's brilliant "second debut" at age 21, when complete creative control contractually reverted to him for the first time ... he made every sound on the album except for guitar and trombone.
"Every day I get on my camel and ride ... " and "Mary wants to be a super-woman ... " oh, man, so great!
Posted on: 23 May 2010 by DeltaSigma
I would add Songs In The Key of Life to the 3 albums mentioned above (as being part of his great period). I would agree that Music of My Mind does not receive the recognition it deserves.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by jazzfan:
I would add Songs In The Key of Life to the 3 albums mentioned above (as being part of his great period). I would agree that Music of My Mind does not receive the recognition it deserves.
I'd agree with that, as well to the inclusion of Fulfillingness' First Finale, both of which, along with Music Of My Mind, Talking Book and Innervisions, comprise the five albums of Stevie's great "classic" period.
Fulfillingness' First Finale has another of my all-time favorite Stevie songs: Creepin'. And Songs In The Key of Life has another: As, with the fantastic electric piano playing of the great Herbie Hancock!
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by DeltaSigma
quote:Originally posted by fred simon:
Fulfillingness' First Finale has another of my all-time favorite Stevie songs: Creepin'. And Songs In The Key of Life has another: As, with the fantastic electric piano playing of the great Herbie Hancock!
Interesting - I had not realized that that was Herbie Hancock.
I can only surmise that, because Music of my Mind was released just a few months prior to Talking Book, it was probably overshadowed by the latter to some extent.
Posted on: 25 May 2010 by fred simon
quote:Originally posted by jazzfan:quote:Originally posted by fred simon:
Fulfillingness' First Finale has another of my all-time favorite Stevie songs: Creepin'. And Songs In The Key of Life has another: As, with the fantastic electric piano playing of the great Herbie Hancock!
Interesting - I had not realized that that was Herbie Hancock.
Yeah, take another listen knowing that it's Herbie ... I'll bet that suddenly it won't sound like anyone else on Earth!
quote:I can only surmise that, because Music of my Mind was released just a few months prior to Talking Book, it was probably overshadowed by the latter to some extent.
Yes, hits like You Are The Sunshine Of My Life and Superstition will tend to overshadow almost anything!
And Music Of My Mind had no such "hits" to speak of ... only Superwoman (which peaked at 33 on the pop charts) and Keep On Running (peaked at 90).
Also, back in the day, like they say, many artists regularly released two albums in some years.