SACD or Naim CDP?

Posted by: airness on 03 February 2002

Dear all,

In view that SACD and DVD-A are more and more popular, is it worth to buy a CD5 at this point of time?

Your views are greatly appreciated.

Patrick

Posted on: 03 February 2002 by Phil Barry
How many CDs do you have? What player are you using now? how do you like it? What do you hope to accomplish by getting a new CD player?

There are lots of CDs available, and buying a used CD is less of a risk than buying a used LP (which may look bad or good but play good or bad). So a good CD player has lots of use left in it.

So if you have lots of CDs and a player you dislike, and if you like the CD5

Phil

Posted on: 03 February 2002 by airness
Hi Phil,

I have just updated my profile. Well, I'm using a Planet and it's showing its age. That's one of the reason that prompt me for a change too. I don't have many CDs, maybe around 150. By changing the player, I would like to improve the PRaT.

SACD seems to be a superior format compare to the red book cd. So I am skeptic about the change.

Patrick

Posted on: 04 February 2002 by Phil Barry
Who can predict the market. SACD has not taken off. DVD-A is made for bass boomers. If you want music published since the '80s, CD is the best choice, so a CD player you like is a good investment.

Phil

Posted on: 04 February 2002 by DAVOhorn
Well i have been there and made the decision.

I was using a modified Orelle cd 100 when i decided that i needed a new cd player.

I was amazed by the sound quality of the SONY SCD 1 and the SCD 777es, also impressed by the Technics A 10 dvd a player.

So what did i do?

i cant use balanced so bought the SCD 777es and saved a few quid into the bargain. I have not regretted this purchase one bit. As a CD player it is fabulous and then i play an SACD which is in a new ball game altogether.

I also bought the Technics A 10 dvd a player for my av system as i do not consider DVD A to be a high quality format for stereo music play back. But as a dvd v and dvd v a player it is fabulous and it is not expensive at this time. It also is a very good cd player into the bargain.

So my advice is to compare cd sacd dvd a if you can and buy what suits your needs. Dont forget that a dvd player of any sort requires a tv to access the menu functions which is a pain,so is not easy to use in a stereo hifi system.

regards david

Posted on: 04 February 2002 by DAVOhorn
In addition to my previous post regarding catalogue.

I was in retail when cd was launched in 1982/83 and you had a choice of approx 9 discs and 2 cd players.

SACD has many players within 3 years of launch some budget and several from major players in the high end. Also there are approx 400 discs to choose from, admittedly not all to my taste but things are improving nicely. Many of the high quality analogue supporters are going for sacd as they can take the analogue MASTERS AND ENCODE VIA DSD TO GIVE VERY HIGH RESOLUTION SACD.
So if the analogue supporters are going for sacd at the premium end of the market then this is good as it is the quality of the original recording that is the limiting factor prior to dsd encoading.
DVD A in my understanding is completely different can of worms.

CD as it is currently has reached the end of its development now relying on up or over sampling,make up the numbers time,to compete with sacd.

So i have taken the plunge and several of my hifi buddies have bought sony sacd as well and we are acquiring software as the catalogue allows.

I want livingston taylor INK, alison kraus,new eric bibb and several others which i am considering. I am still however buying cd as my scad player does a fabulous job of playing them.

regards david

Posted on: 04 February 2002 by airness
What's the rest of your system so as to extract every single bit in the SACD? Thanks.
Posted on: 04 February 2002 by airness
Hi Guys,

Thanks for your point of view. Most probably I will save up for a CD5 while waiting for the market of SACD to grow.

Cheers,

Patrick

Posted on: 05 February 2002 by Alex S.
Whilst you're saving up and regardless of the present catalogue, why not spend a day listening to some options. You could try a CD5, Rega Jupiter, 1K Sony SACD player (for CD and SACD) and see what you thought of the relative merits. I would also think about bringing your own Planet to see how that fares.

Alex

Posted on: 05 February 2002 by Neville
Patrick,

There's a secondhand CD5 for sale on HiFiforsale at £750.

Posted on: 05 February 2002 by DAVOhorn
Dear Airness,

re the rest of my system.


S.Brooks mega mains cleaner.
S.Brooks mains leads.
pure silver interconnect.
Van den Hul CS 122 speaker cable from power amp through crossover and onto driveunits.
Concordant Audio Excelsior valve pre with groove tube matched valves alps pot and silver wired.
EAR 529 500w valve power amps,high quality pots and silver wired for signal path.
Sony SCD 777es SACD player.
ACR Eckhorn horn loaded loudspeakers (similar to Klipschorn), with added Pioneer PTR 7 ribbon super tweeter ( 5khz - 100 khz ).

so we have a source that has a theoretical bandwidth of 1hz - 100khz.
A valve pre good for 15 hz- > 100 khz.
a valve power amp good for 15 hz - approx 75 khz.
speakers good for 25 hz - 100 khz.

So in theory the limiting factor is now the software performance not hardware .

If you look at KEF Linn Tannoy SONY Technics Fostex and several others they are adding super tweeters to theyre top flight product to take advantag of SACD bandwidth.

Before you ask, when i added my super tweeters, the tweeters in the speakers were good to 45 khz.
So adding the PT R 7 only added 45 khz - 100 khz,
why could i hear a difference. Also friends could hear a difference. Now when i last teseted my hearing i could hear to approx 14-15 khz.
So what is going on. Many people have suggested that we are hearing the effects of high harmonics on the main frequencies and this affects the leading edge of the note and also adds air space depth height information , which could not be heard before due to the source or speakers not reproducing this information. I believe that increasing the high frequency band width to well beyond 20 khz is a must have if you are able to take advantage of it.
This is my opinion and i have spent my own money to achieve it.

regards david

Posted on: 05 February 2002 by Martin M
quote:
why could i hear a difference. Also friends could hear a difference. Now when i last teseted my hearing i could hear to approx 14-15 khz

I would imagine that unless there is a very sharp crossover from tweeter to super tweeter, the super tweeter is contributing some output to the top octave of your ears 'pass-band'. I would also imagine that the super-tweeter's dispertion pattern is much wider than a horn speaker at these frequncies. Perhaps this what you are hearing not ultra-sonics?

I am interested to hear why you dismiss DVD-A as being poorer than SACD - my technical opinion is quite the reverse - although I have not yet heard DVD-A myself.

Having said that the launch of DVD-A is one of the most idiotic things I have seen - the requirement to have a monitor to select menus to bizarre (especially when the monitor's EMC emissions will easily screw up the DVD-A player's noise floor much beyond 18-bits of res).

Interested in your opinions.

Posted on: 05 February 2002 by airness
Rega Jupiter. Interesting... Have you heard it? How does it perform when compare to a CD5? Thanks.
Posted on: 05 February 2002 by airness
quote:
Originally posted by Neville:
Patrick,

There's a secondhand CD5 for sale on HiFiforsale at £750.


Thanks Neville, I will check it out.

Posted on: 05 February 2002 by airness
With the super tweeter, i guess you really benefitted from SACD.
Posted on: 06 February 2002 by Alex S.
I've listened to a Jupiter and to a CD5 but not on the same occasion so I can't say how they compare other than to say I like them both so if your hunting for a 1K-ish CDP you should have them both on your list, especially as you own a Rega already. I certainly prefer these two to other offerings like the Arcam FMJ. Rega and Naim play music!

Alex

Posted on: 06 February 2002 by Alex S.
I know I'm not Joolz but I have the DSP E800 with a 32.5/110 and various cast off speakers. Works fine, but I refuse to spend big money on 'Home Cineama'.

BTW You'll be staring at that CD5 in Loot for 10 days whether its sold or not I'm afraid.

Alex

Posted on: 06 February 2002 by Phil Barry
I am very sensitive to CD 'hash' - if the player isn't smooth, I can listen for only a few minutes at a time.

With that supreme value, I found the CD5 listenable (eminently so with a PSU) and the Jupiter unlistenable. I heard the Jupiter in a round earth system, though,

Phil

Posted on: 06 February 2002 by DAVOhorn
Dear Martin M,

all the drive units in my speakers are horn loaded.

The bass horn is a Klipsch

The mid is horn loaded compression

the tweeter is horn loaded good to 40khz

the super tweeter is a horn loaded ribbon tweeter
and its crossover point is 1st order at 20khz.

If any body is going to invest in a new player to play cd and maybe SACD DVD A then before investing a sum of money in a player that cannot take advantage of the new formats they should consider a machine that can take advantage of at least one of the new formats.
However, if not then keep the cd player and add a new format player at a later date.

As i have already said i voted with my wallet and went SACD.

The SONY 777 is a mighty fine red book cd player inits own right and has the advantage of playing SACD as well which on the evidence of what i have heard is the new format of choice as a two channel replay system.

I have yet to be convinced of the merits of multi channel for music only reproduction. For movies it is great fun.

regards david

Posted on: 06 February 2002 by P
Hey I'm really open minded and all that but this is getting bloody ridiculous!

Where are the defenders of the sacred realm?
(sorry, just seen LOTR)

P

Posted on: 06 February 2002 by Martin M
Dave

quote:
the super tweeter is a horn loaded ribbon tweeter and its crossover point is 1st order at 20khz

So about 12 dB down at 5 kHz ish. You will be hearing a fair bit of contribution from the ribbons.

Anyway Klipschorn & EAR 529. Nice. Heard them individually (well I think it was a 529 maybe a 549) and was very impressed.

Posted on: 09 February 2002 by DAVOhorn
Dear Martin M,

The EAR 529 are a rare beast as only 50 pairs were built. Mine are one of 2 pairs sold in the uk the remainder going to europe and the far east.

they were reviewed in a german mag and they produced well above the quoted power of 500w 8 ohm
and actually produced 700w into 8 ohm. Not bad !!!

i really enjoy listening to them as for a large amp they really can be very delicate sounding at low levels but can also produce thunderous power when necessary. They never seem to run out of power.

They will have to go back to EAR sometime for a service and overhaul as there are one or two minor gremlins with them at this time. Would i swap them??????

Only for a pair of CARY 805 but they are still funny money. A bit of a contrast to go to 15 w single ended, but my horns are 105 dbw so this is of little consequence.

regards david