Led Zep remasters
Posted by: stephenjohn on 24 January 2006
Do these offer anything over non remastered CDs?
Posted on: 24 January 2006 by Milan
I actually prefered the non mastered. But then I also have the vynil!
Posted on: 24 January 2006 by chuck777
I think that there is not a big difference however I tend to lean toward the re-masters and am gradually replacing my non mastered ones. So far I have replaced I,III,& IV and am happy with the sound the re-masters have over my old ones. IMHO, I think they have more authority and dig deeper into the sessions. This is preference of course and I think you might see if any one you know has any of them and try them for yourself.
Regards,
Charles
Regards,
Charles
Posted on: 25 January 2006 by jlfrs
I thought the Remasters a good collection but didn't serve up anything new, perhaps just a different interpretation by the man twiddling the knobs, in this case Jimmy Paige.
I have a remastered "best of The Zombies" collection and although the songs are now presented in stereo, the new product is far inferior but like many things, it's probably a matter for personal taste rather than a statement of fact.
I have a remastered "best of The Zombies" collection and although the songs are now presented in stereo, the new product is far inferior but like many things, it's probably a matter for personal taste rather than a statement of fact.
Posted on: 25 January 2006 by Shayman