Advanced search

Beresford 7510 DAC - Calling All Owners

Posted by: joe90 on 13 January 2009

Hi guys

Who has a Beresford 7510 DAC?

What do you think?

What's your setup?

Did you try it against the Benchmark and Lavry?
Posted on: 19 January 2009 by Wazza69
quote:
Originally posted by munch:
Its so good when your ears tell you what to do.
Dont you think?
Do you still have the kit in your Profile?


Sorry, I havent updated the profile as I have moved away from Naim. I now have a Exposure XXI pre with a IV power amp from the Farlowe era into Ruark Talisman 2's. Really fantastic, IMHO the amps areat least as good as a 202/200 with a slightly warmer sound. I do love the Naim CD Players though so am hoping for a Naim DAC to add to the front end.
Posted on: 23 January 2009 by ChrisBathory
quote:
Originally posted by js:
It looks like there's an additional supply filter inboard of the 12v input. Large cap and diode, maybe a zener so unless you bypass that the difference may not be very significant anyway. The issue is determining when is it no longer cost effective.

I'd replace the output coupling caps with tants of at least 10v rating as I believe there's over 6 VDC to block. Only the 220mf ones near the outputs for fixed output. Vaiable and headphone outs can't be made as good but still improved with similar bits in a few more places. This isn't brain surgery. You'll probably have to parallel a few to get value but I really didn't check what's value Tants are readily available. No gaurantees as parts do sound different even if they measure the same. Combos can be intersting. Smile I've done these things (and slightly more)to an $80 Beresford equivilent that was on sale from MCM in the states. Fiddled about for few hours with bits I had laying around. Don't know what others have done but I suspect most revelations on the Beresford are related to coupling caps. It's a neat toy for what it costs as I'll just move it to the TV or something when I'm done with it. While it's no SN and the results not earth shattering, I've 'cheated' the sound to be acceptable enough to play around with until I can find a DAC that I actually desire. I've heard most of the mid priced DACs and some were also acceptable but didn't offer enough FOR ME either so I cheaped out just to be able to experiment at home. I'm a tweek anyway so I thought I'd take a look. Stock, it was a bit fuzzy, anemic and lacked some solidity but come on, it was $80 US shipped and lots better than the DAC in my cable box even if I had left it alone.

PC, try polarity on the AC adapter.


Hi Mr js,

I'm a Beresford owner (CD2/52/supercap/250/SBL) using a SB3 to wirelessly access EAC-ripped wavs on my computer. I have added linear supplies to both the SB3 and the Beresford. I was quite pleased with it at first, but as the CD2 does outperform it I've ended up rarely listening to it.

Anyhow as a keen experimenter (but one who won't touch Naim boxes) I was very interested by your 'hot-rodding' nods to the DAC - I've replaced the supply diode with a link (subtle improvement I think) and am now eyeing the output caps. I noted that the official MOD21 upgrade suggests 47UF 25V electrolytics, but I wondered what tants you are using there? - and if there were other things you might suggest?

Cheers!
Chris
Posted on: 23 January 2009 by js
That value sounds viable as long as you're using a Naim input. Other impedences might require the higher and closer to original value for full low frequency responce. I didn't make this too techy as I just wanted to voice it to my liking. I don't really know how low you can go as I don't know the circuit impedence. I mimmicked the original value with 10v or higher Tants in parallel. I measured and found 6V dc to block so this should be fine. 25v is probably better. Really, it's about playing with bits and I just prefer Tants to electrolytics here. They do vary in sound like all caps and wont 'cover their tracks' like an electrolytic so finding a combo that works will be interesting. Any single tant would have not been as good. I'm cheating. Winker As I said, I just used old bits I had about. I knew their characters and played a bit until I thought there wasn't much more to be had. Phase on the power and a couple of turns on the power cord. Hardly hot rodded, just tweeked. As much luck as skill on this one I think.
I understand removing the diode when using a regulated linear supply but it's probably better with it otherwise. I would think that the associated cap itself doesn't need to be there at all with a proper supply but I'm not going in again to check as it will always be limited and I'm done. Just a bit of playing about. It's rather like plumbing. Easy if you have lots of familiar bits about but can be a real pain if you don't. Smile Who knows, maybe I'll try my 12v psc on it but really, it becomes the tail wagging the dog for me at some point. The limitations that I hear probably won't get worked around with a better PS that I suspect would also change the voicing. These sort of endevors end when you decide they're over. I'm there. LOL
Posted on: 23 January 2009 by ChrisBathory
Thanks hugely for the advice - I'm really keen now to fiddle around a little more Smile...

I'll let you know how I get on!
Posted on: 29 January 2009 by u5227470736789524
I have a Beresford dac I bought new last year. I use the fixed outputs to my integrated amp.

Is it possible to use the outputs simultaneously ? - and use the variable outputs to the line-in of a powerd subwoofer ?

Stan would be the best one to ask but the "contact us" link on his website errors out.

Thanks for any help

Jeff A
Posted on: 29 January 2009 by js
Yes, you can.
Posted on: 29 January 2009 by u5227470736789524
quote:
Originally posted by js:
Yes, you can.


Thank you, js. Much appreciated.
Posted on: 29 January 2009 by js
2 volume controls is bit daunting but I'll assume you have a plan.
Posted on: 29 January 2009 by u5227470736789524
quote:
Originally posted by js:
2 volume controls is bit daunting but I'll assume you have a plan.


Haven't got the sub yet, but the manual says it has a volume bypass, so I could control it with the Beresford, or opposite, determine a position for the Beresford (perhaps 12 o'clock) and use the remote volume on the sub for tweaking.

Plenty of opportunity to be obsessive - a comfort zone for me Smile

Jeff A
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by u5227470736789524
I didn't really think that through all the way, did I ? I am really dealing with three volume controls - once I sorted the sub/dac issue I still would have the main volume control on the integrated only handling the monitors.

Still haven't got the sub, but expect I will go with the speaker level connections.

Jeff A
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by matt303
Time for a budget DAC shootout.



Initial view is that the DacMagic has a more refined/richer sound and slightly deeper more controlled bass.

I'll run them both for a while.
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by js
Cambridge easily wins that one. Use Min phase. I didn't really prefer ir to mine but you could tell it was more correct especially in the bottom, good right out of the box and there's more available if you want the hassle. USB is nice for those that don't mind the OS. None of these will ever replace a good deck but it's a bit of fun.
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by Former member
quote:
None of these will ever replace a good deck but it's a bit of fun.


Haven't used my deck since I got my AE and DAC. I suspect there are quite a few people finding the same.

The problem for CD decks is that the pc>dac route doesn't give you a drop in sound quality. Often it's the reverse.
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by gary1 (US)
quote:
Originally posted by avole:
quote:
None of these will ever replace a good deck but it's a bit of fun.


Haven't used my deck since I got my AE and DAC. I suspect there are quite a few people finding the same.

The problem for CD decks is that the pc>dac route doesn't give you a drop in sound quality. Often it's the reverse.


Sorry, avole, but I haven't heard one PC/Mac + DAC combo that could touch even the entry level Naim CDP.
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by iiyama
IMHO the Mac/Lavry is clearly better than the CDX2.

Looking forward to the Naim DAC, what does it say about the HDX or SN DAC?
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by gary1 (US)
quote:
Originally posted by iiyama:
IMHO the Mac/Lavry is clearly better than the CDX2.

Looking forward to the Naim DAC, what does it say about the HDX or SN DAC?


iiyama, I'm glad you are enjoying your Mac/Lavry and you are entitled to your opinion on its performance. As you are I'm sure aware from previous posts that I do not share those sentiments about the Lavry. Had the chance to hear the Cambridge DAC last weekend and this was better musically than the Lavry for less than 1/2 the cost. Still cannot hold a candle to the SN DAC or HDX.
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by badlyread
I must agree with Matt. I found the CA DacMagic to be better(see earlier post) than my Beresford (now with a new owner). Just waiting the arrival of a Sony CDP 337ESD to see what the DAC does with that.

Regards

Neil
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by js
quote:
Originally posted by iiyama:
IMHO the Mac/Lavry is clearly better than the CDX2.

Looking forward to the Naim DAC, what does it say about the HDX or SN DAC?
I think Gary would tell you that Naim's top players are better on CD than the HDX or SN even though he owns both.
I don't recall this being a Lavry thread but glad you like it. I feel otherwise though it's a fine DAC for the price but also opinion. I'm hoping a Naim DAC will get us all on the same page and finally end this. I was referring to only the DACs in question so as to avoid this run around for the nth time.
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by kuma
quote:
Originally posted by iiyama:
Looking forward to the Naim DAC, what does it say about the HDX or SN DAC?

Absolutely nothing.

Except you preferred the mac/Lavry's presentation.
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by Former member
quote:
Originally posted by gary1 (US):
quote:
Originally posted by iiyama:
IMHO the Mac/Lavry is clearly better than the CDX2.

Looking forward to the Naim DAC, what does it say about the HDX or SN DAC?


iiyama, I'm glad you are enjoying your Mac/Lavry and you are entitled to your opinion on its performance. As you are I'm sure aware from previous posts that I do not share those sentiments about the Lavry. Had the chance to hear the Cambridge DAC last weekend and this was better musically than the Lavry for less than 1/2 the cost. Still cannot hold a candle to the SN DAC or HDX.
You are at it again.
How can you say the cambridge is better Than the Lavry and your Snait does it for you Confused
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by Former member
Why kuma are you so down on the Lavry?
Months and months ago you were down on the DA-10.
Before your friend lent you one.
The one he had in his loft for two years. Confused
Then on here you asked for peoples help on cables.
Got a shed load of info.
Then after 3 days said it was shite.
More going on here than meets the eye.
Me thinks.
Every one over there in the USA STILL jump on any Lavry post and put it down.
Even now after all this time.
The Fix has always been in regarding this little black box from you lot over there.
And it comes from your country.
Here in the UK it is still selling big time.
The price has gone up buy a couple of £100 also
And it is Selling to top end Naim cdp owners.
Because its a very very good product.
It works from day one and sounds good from day one.
So why keep putting the downer on it?
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by kuma
quote:
Originally posted by munch:
So why keep putting the downer on it?

munch,

the same reason you are harping on it.

*All in fun* as you say. Winker
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by gary1 (US)
Actually munch, there have been numerous posts over the last several weeks where I could have commented and put in my two cents worth about the Lavry vs. but I have for the most part stayed away. The problem is that others continue to harp on about the superiority of their Mac/DAC over the Naim CDPs/HDX/SN DAC whatever and despite the fact that we've been through this any number of times individuals who've participated in these threads continue to post these types of comments. While I think that we're all tired of this every once in a while I just happen to respond, so what?

Not only did I think that the Cambridge DAC sounded beter than the Lavry, I though JS' modified $80 Chinese DAC was much better than the Lavry. You disgree, fine. I'm not sure what you mean about the "fix" being in for an American product. Would love to have liked the Lavry, it would have saved me a good amount of money, but it just didn't cut it for me and for others. The fact that top end Naim CDP owners have sold their CDPs and replaced it with the DA-10 is meaningless to me and says nothing whatsoever about the quality of the Lavry. As I said a modified $80 DAC sounded to me much better than the DA-10, but that's my opinion. Nor from my listening can I ever comprehend how any of you guys sold your CDPs. So what, it just means that you spent alot less money than I did to get the type of playback which sounded good to you that you wanted.

As John said I hope Naims product is terrific so we can all agree and end this discussion once and for all.
Posted on: 31 January 2009 by js
Gary, You may have heard a better overall sound but I think that may have been source related as opposed to the overall goodness of the DACs. The digital ducks were all in a row. Smile Doesn't make your observations any less valid but it's somewhat relative. Does point to the fragility of the medium.

I'm still waiting for your P-line. Frown
Posted on: 01 February 2009 by matt303
DACs are no different to any other piece of HiFi equipment in that they are engineered to a cost and a presentation*. Seeing as people on this forum are using a wide range of DACs it's unsurprising that people disagree about which is best. The lack of a Naim DAC also means we don't have reference for "the Naim sound" to compare against.

* which is basically why you choose one unit over the others, the presentation it's designers wanted combine with some psychoacoustic preconceptions about that brand (Naim is hard and fast, MF are warm, Arcam are dull, etc) and if these match what you are looking for in a device you'll pick it over the others. Selecting HiFi is a VERY subjective and personal thing otherwise you'd be able to do it based on specification sheets, you are not choosing the better device simply the one you like.

(quite a rant for a Sunday morning)