"hi-fi"

Posted by: seagull on 10 June 2002

We were visiting some friends recently and somehow the conversation moved round to money and hi-fi. Our friends were amazed when my wife told them how much I'd recently spent - I didn't like to tell them that was only for a cd player, speakers and a rack (I already had the Naim amps).

"£2000 on stereo!? But that's a holiday!" (julie thought it was for a complete system)

Hmmm, Julie never takes into account the cost of clothes, meals and DRINK! but I understood where she's coming from, she didn't rate hi-fi very high on her list of priorites... She then said that their cd player (meaning the **** mini stack thing) wasn't working. A quick glance showed a huge vase of flowers sitting directly on top of the unit. I suggested that she should move the vase because mixing water and electricity is never a good idea I reckon that the weight of the vase, water and flowers probably distorted the (plastic) case of the unit resulting in the laser alignment being out. She also said that they didn't listen to music much anyway (I'm not surprised - it sounded dreadful when it used to work!)

A visit to some other friends at the week-end I was subjected to more crappy 'hi-fi', although the volume levels were low the ridiculously over boosted bass overpowered everything else to the point of the music being played being almost unrecognisable (mind you, I thought that was just as well given what I did recognise!). I ended up with a head-ache (this is someone who once fell asleep propped up against a PA stack at Reading Rock) and was releaved to go home.

At another recent party I was asked if I could sort out the row emanating from their speakers (again ridiculously overpowering flabby bass). It was a party, I had been imbibing several pints of ale (see my "what were your last five pints" thread for examples) and like most of you I'm used to only having input selectors and volume control on my amplifier. The 'hi-fi' had this funny dial thing on it which allowed you to select all sorts of settings (like Disco, concert hall etc.) all of which sounded crap. It also had a very bright led display which danced to the music. I couldn't find how to remove the bass boost etc and soon gave up trying.

If you're still with me you're probably wondering "What is the point of this rambling?" and "Why would some one with the obvious wit and itelligence of Seagull bother to waste his life writing it in the first place?" and "Why am I still reading this drivel?"

I just thought I'd like to remind everyone here the reason why they buy Naim gear is to improve their own quality of life by listening to music. Also that there is a huge gap between the amount of listening pleasure to be derived from music played on real hi-fi and music played on the statistically modal level midi system found in most homes. Its not really a case of value for money (£550 vs £5500) the difference is not ten times better its a case of the real hi-fi being the absolute minimum level for listening pleasure. If I had a cheap stereo at home it probably wouldn't get played that much either. My wife claims not to be able to tell the difference but she rarely plays music at home - she was always wary of the LP12 but even using the CD5 scares her.

If I had the money I'd probably spend it on more gear (yes that Armageddon and Aro for my LP12, the CDSII and XPS, perhaps the 552/500 and SBLs etc.) but as I don't I've probably come to the end of my journey for now (its about 18 years since my last foray into hi-fi, about the same length of time I've been with the boss!) so I don't suffer from upgrade-itis (not terminally anyway). I just think that being subjected to other people's "hi-fi" systems has made me appreciate my own even more.

Try it some day (if you only know audiophiles go to Currys or Comet and have a listen) then go home and enjoy what you have already.
Posted on: 10 June 2002 by Nigel Cavendish
I always say a holiday lasts a couple of weeks but the enjoyment of music is forever.

cheers

Nigel

Posted on: 10 June 2002 by woodface
Your point about people comparing the cost of a holiday with that of Hi-fi is quite amusing. Your average bod will gladly drop £2000 for 2-weeks in the sun when all they have to show for it is a faded tan and few naff snaps! I enjoy my record collection all year round and 20 minutes with my hi-fi removes the streses and strains of life in a way that a holiday never can! It is ironic that having something tangible for your money (a hifi) is seen as less sensible than a transient holiday experience! I honestly believe that the vast majority of people no longer like music but go on holiday to keep up with the joneses; result = crappy midi system and yearly trips to Florida!
Posted on: 10 June 2002 by John Sheridan
Interesting, you'll probably also find the same people who are shocked by the '£2000 on a hifi' statement happily buying a new car which will depreciate more than that when they first put the key in the ignition.
Posted on: 10 June 2002 by Mick P
Chaps

My take on this is dead simple....you worked for the money, you can spend it how you like and you need justify it to no one.

My son has a friend who won £60,000 on the lottery. He was in his late twenties and single. He decided to pack in work. He rented a flat in London and spent the money on expensive prostitutes and good living.

When the money ran out, he returned to Swindon and got a job. He has never regretted the episode at all. He has a lot of good memories and he considers it money well spent.

Regards

Mick
Posted on: 10 June 2002 by Jez Quigley
John, the car analogy is a good one. I can't understand why people think it is perfectly reasonable to spend say, £16000 (insert your figure here)on a car that is fecked after 5 years, but break out into a sweat if the 'hi-fi' costs more than £249.99. " But I don't play music that much" - no wonder, in fact they aren't playing 'music' at all!

The 250 in my second system is around 25 years old and leaves anything there has ever been in Comet/Curry's, or even most 'hi-fi' shops, for dead.
Posted on: 10 June 2002 by Derek Wright
I very rarely dem my system to casual visitors, if they notice and ask to hear it then I give them a go. If someone asks to come and hear it then we a have a serious listen. Otherwise it is as the heading says.

The cost is only mentioned if the listener asks.

However one of Mick Ps colleagues had a listen to it the other day - he had seen it thru the window and commented on it as he was delivering the mail. So he got a quick listen - mustn't delay the mail must we.

Derek
Posted on: 10 June 2002 by Markus
IMHO lies squarely on the shoulders of the manufacturers of the mass market equipment sold in the late '70's and '80's. Do you remember the '70's? Hi-fi was king and "everybody" aspired to own a "good" stereo. There were lots of shops and knowledgeable consumers shopped with interest and enthusiasm.

BUT, once the manufacturers started selling based on specifications and shipping masses of product to the stack 'em high, sell 'em low, stores, all hope was lost. After all, if specifications told the consumer all they needed to know and price was the only variable then what did we need specialist's for? A sorry situation indeed!

And marketing cd's as "perfect sound forever" only made a bad situation go to worse. No wonder people listen to crap! It's been 20 years since they've heard a decent system! I'm referring here to the classic Pioneer/Marantz/Kenwood with Advent speakers "rock" systems of back in the day. Not high end by any stretch of the imagination but clearly Leagues ahead of todays mini-boombox, all-in-one crap systems....

Markus
Posted on: 10 June 2002 by Not For Me
One of my favourite moments was the look of utter and complete incomprehension on the face of a double glazing rep seliing me some windows when I compared his finance deal to the interest free credit deal I had just bought the new needle for the record player with!

He could simply not conceive of any part of a hi-fi costing more than £100.

DS

OTD - still suncoilsect
Posted on: 10 June 2002 by JohanR
Yes, this talk about it being "normal" to spend £16000, or whatever, on a car and that you must be a lunatic to spend it on a HiFi system is interesting.

In the 1950:s a HiFi system (there wheren't many sold, but think of Quad or Marantz) costed as much as a car. Even a table radio, I guess, was quite expensive.
In the 1970:- a "HiFi" system, the ones that everybody bought costed around £300 and a car £3000. A factor of ten.
Today, a "LoFi" system, the ones that everybody byes costs £200 and a car £20000. A factor of hundred!

Considering inflation the prices of cars have kept steady and the prices of music systems is constantly dropping.

I will now stick out my head and state that this dropping of prices could have happened to car prices to! Remember Ford model T, it constantly got cheaper and cheaper. But the car industry is to smart for this to happen! They compete with performance, not prices. You know, 130 Bhp is not enough, you "must" have at least 170. You are a nobody with only steel rims. This car is more fun to drive. Etc. etc.

Of course, the "real" Hifi industry (Naim and others) are competing with performance. They still costs as much as a car!

JohanR
Posted on: 11 June 2002 by seagull
Julie (& Peter) did recently buy a brand new people carrier and yearn after a holiday in Florida! They then had to spend a couple of hundred on replacing the wing mirror that Julie managed to wreck when reversing off our drive roll eyes

Our other friends (in the second example) also recently bought a people carrier and had a holiday in Florida this year.

I think there could be a trend here smile

Ok we bought one of our own cars from new (a Saxo VTS soon after they were launched), but that was in the days when we had money to spare (i.e. before our daughter was born after a gap of 11 years!) and we did go to Florida (ditto).

This year's holiday was sacrificed so that I could spend the money on the hi-fi this year cool

I dare say next year will be pay back time!
Posted on: 11 June 2002 by Muzza
I agree with much of the above. But have another
aspect which could be drawn in too. Certainly here in New Zealand you could part with a considerable wedge of cash for one of these "lights flashing, push a button, program up" sound emitters OR you could spend the exact same amount on a decent wee Hifi device/s.
The same money would buy you something quite listenable, say Marantz Rotel/Kef Sony/Denon/Mission throw in NAD, AMC etc etc You don't have to pay a fortune to get an acceptable sound.
What do you think ?
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by Eric Barry
A relative cheap cd and amp with well chosen cheap speakers will see off those midi systems. The problem is the speakers--big, with big woofers, thin cabinets, and tuned to sound extra boomy and roll of the treble, then sat on the floor, often against the wall or in the corner.

--Eric
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by greeny
I agree with some of the above.

However the comparison with a car is a bit unfair. For most people (in the UK anyway) a car is a necessity. ANd about £3K is the minimum entry price for a half decent, reasonabley reliable s/h family saloon. Obviously as prices increase so does build quality, age, performance, comfort etc. The comparable hi/fi to this is a £200 mini/midi affair that can just about do the job.

Now, many people spend a lot longer in the car than listening to music, so spending the money to improve your quality of life by reducing your comuting stress seems very sensible to me.

Many people will make the argument that they do not listen to music enough to justify a decent hifi, hence the mini/midi system. Where most people go wrong is that for a little more money £400-500 they could get a separates system That would simply blow their midi out of the water.
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by seagull
Do most people spend so little time listening to music because their system is cheap and crap?

or

Are most people's systems cheap and crap because they spend so little time listening to music?

Having spent a fair mount of time with a poorly amp (lack of funds to get it serviced) I had it serviced earlier this year it sounds great now and I've re-kindled my enthusiasm for my record collection again before the service I was reluctant to play music. Whenever I am at home now, I play music - except when the football's on! big grin just like I used to when I first bought my Linn/Naim kit in the early 80's.
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by Jez Quigley
quote:
The comparable hi/fi to this is a £200 mini/midi affair that can just about do the job.



No it isn't! The comparable transport to a £200 mini 'hi-fi'(sic) is bare feet riddled with varucaes walking on broken glass to a Barry Manilow concert.
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by Arye_Gur
seagull

I’m ashamed to say, that a nephew of mine whom stereo system was stolen asks me what can she buy with a budget of 1,000$ and I didn’t know what to tell her.
I could advice her if she asks about a 10,000$ system…

Arye
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by Frank Abela
One of my best friends doesn't get my hifi addiction. He 'gets' that I'm addicted but not why I should put up with the quirks of what we would call an audiophile hifi. So what did he do? He blew lots of money on a B&O TV with those tall cylindrical speakers and the hang-on-the-wall 5-CD changer sexy CD toy.

Loads of money, no sound quality and he's not really that taken with the HiFi thing anyway! The speakers aren't even located to do their job properly either. ARGH!

Regards,
Frank.
All opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of any organisations I work for, except where this is stated explicitly.
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by Thomas K
Frank, that is sad indeed - shame about the dosh. Does he also have one of those "Tower" CD stands, holds 50 CDs horizontally and looks really funky?

Thomas
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by Greg Beatty
I wonder just how many people *would* listen to lots (not just "more" mind you) music if they had, say, CDX-Nait 5-Credos at home instead of the mini or low-cost amp settup (like mine!!!).

My experience has been that there are people out there that the good system would make little difference to - they would *still* switch on the tele most evenings and the CDX wouldn't get used much.

Its not just the system. The person has to go to the effort to seek out and purchase new music as well. Gets kind of drab playing the same 50 CDs over and over again. Not everyone is *that* interested in music beyond hearing the latest pop tune-and many of these are mixed for cheap systems.

Thoughts?

- GregB

Insert Witty Signature Line Here
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by ejl
quote:
ust wondering how many of us decided to spend money on our equipment and
software and gave up on driving a new car to do so.


I'm another one keeping an old reliable car to focus on other things like music (and also a nicer home). I find it striking how many people find the increase in standard-of-living provided by a new car -- which I think is really very small -- justifying the significant financial burden the car imposes.

Here in the southern US, it's actually getting a bit disturbing to frequently observe several exceptionally expensive trucks/SUVs parked in front of very modest homes or low-rent apartments. To each his own -- I understand it -- but this is veering on collective neurosis
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by garyi
Yup, scarping along on a G reg Orion. Although I have just 'invested' in an N reg Skoda big grin
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by GaryW
I recently bought my mother a Denon DM30 one-box thingies for £300 (complete with little Mission speakers) and it blows away every other similarly priced midi/mini system I've ever heard.

She loves it!

The other week I bought some half decent stands for the speakers and swapped the bell-wire for average speaker cable and even my mother could hear the difference these changes made.
Picture total amazement that a wire can make that much of an improvement. big grin

Why did I buy that one? Because I did research. I read reviews and asked my dealer what they recommended. And I listened to it first.

She now listens to much more music than before (and has even bought the matching tape deck and soon the CD-recorder) and thoroughly enjoys it.

Maybe she'll never want to join me on the Naim path, but her appreciation of the music she has always enjoyed has greatly increased.

Pretty good sounding stuff can be had without spending the sort of money we do and maybe encouraging your "I don't listen to much music" friends to spend £300 and get the best they can for their money will increase their enjoyment of music.
And result in the death of flashing lights, graphic equalisers and "Concert Hall 1" settings. big grin

What makes this whole crappy midi situation worse is the "that looks cool\nice\techy in the Argos catalogue" approach to buying.

I'm sure virtually no one on this forum would dream of buying anything remotely hi-fi without listening to it first or a car without a test drive.

Joolz,
If you think the grief over the price of a Hi-Cap is bad, try explaining £50 for a pack of 4 Nordost isolation points ("50 quid for them silver things????")
Posted on: 12 June 2002 by herm
you never can tell

A thing to keep in mind though is that our perceptions are infinitely elastic. Tonight I listened to a Haydn string quartet I hadn't played for thirty years (thanks to the new huge Philips Angeles box) - and obviously the equipment is a lot better than the Marantz amp Technics TT I had in the early seventies. But, man, did I love that music back then. Still do, and I'm so glad too, with the progress made, in equipment material and cerebral. But still&hellip It's like those tiny tv-screens. Your eye gets used to it. It sees everything that's there. So perhaps we just get better stuff to achieve the same degree of pleasure?

Herman
Posted on: 13 June 2002 by seagull
quote:
Originally posted by GaryW:
I recently bought my mother a Denon DM30 one-box thingies for £300 (complete with little Mission speakers) and it blows away every other similarly priced midi/mini system I've ever heard.




Looks quite cute. I was looking for a system for my teenage son's birthday later this year - I had no idea what to look for but that appears to offer everything he would want (i.e. a CD player and apparently a reasonable sound - must find one to try it (I found it on the web for £253) but obviously need a demo first.

My initial suggestion to the Boss was to give Tom a new cd player and my old amp and speakers and for me to buy some new ones (NAIM of course!) - nice try I thought but that was a non-starter! frown
Posted on: 13 June 2002 by Jean-Marc
Great thread there.
What matters more? The hardware or the music?
I enjoy listening to music from an early age and spent 10 years with a below average "hi fi" system. It served me to discover and appreciate the music. Now I've got more money to spent and have been addicted to Naim gears, I know where my own truth is and really love the music as delivered on such a system.
But if I had to choose, I will keep my record collection. Hardware can be replaced, music not.

Jean-Marc