Pentagon CCTV Footage

Is not a plane.
Can't be a boeing 747 or similar.
Looks more like a missile.
A boeing 747 or similar class areoplane with even partial full tanks, at 500/600 klms per hour speed or more would have destroied the building to small pieces.

Dont' worry.
All the world saw it.

The GIF image is working on Photobucket, but maybe this site doesn't allow moving images.

It certainly looks like a missile to me, and I've never seen it before.

USA governement has been forced to show the images.
Btw there's a lot of books aroud talking about it.
Question: do you think that an exploding airplane would have left the camera entire?

If indeed it was a missile, who fired it and where from?

Beano

quote:

Originally posted by Beano:
If indeed it was a missile, who fired it and where from?

Beano

I don't know.
But if somebody say Bin Laden i do leave again.

It wasn't a 747, it was a 757 which had already pretty much crashed into the ground by all accounts. There's a busy road (especially at that time of the morning) which runs pretty close past the West side of the Pentagon, and there's no-where to have fired what would have to be a pretty huge missile from.

How is that that a plane that would have "destroyed the building to small pieces" managed to crash into the world trade centre (twice) and seemed to simply disappear into the buildings, disintegrating on impact, only leaving a plane shaped hole in the side of the building?

The world trade centre construction was of a 'solid' load-bearing core, and a load-bearing outer wall, with no other supports, leaving the offices very much open plan. Even this managed to withstand the impact of the fully laden planes, which pretty much disintegrated on impact. Why then should the reinforced 5 concrete rings of the Pentagon have been destroyed in a similar impact?

Although they weigh several tens of tons, planes consist of a great deal of empty space. They disintegrate, along with the people in them, on impact with anything much more solid than a frozen chicken! This is evident on any water crash landing, where there are only extremely small bits of plane, and people, left afterwards.

The West 'wing' of the building had recently been refurbished, including reinforcements, and suffered about as much damage as one would expect given the above facts.

Come on guys, get a grip

Phil

Surely the most likely scenario is that Bush arranged for a missile to be fired at the Pentagon. At the same time he destroyed and hid a Boeing 757 with its crew and passengers.

He also to orchestrated the destruction of the twin towers. These were clearly demolished using explosives while the aeroplanes that we saw crashing into them were just a decoy.

In this way, Bush managed to demonise Bin Laden in the eyes of the Americans which gave him an excuse to invade Afghanistan and gain control of their heroin production.

The next stage was to invade Iraq, bomb Iran, marry Mary Magdalene and live in the South of France with the knights of ....

quote:

Originally posted by 7V:
Surely the most likely scenario is that Bush arranged for a missile to be fired at the Pentagon. At the same time he destroyed and hid a Boeing 757 with its crew and passengers.

He also to orchestrated the destruction of the twin towers. These were clearly demolished using explosives while the aeroplanes that we saw crashing into them were just a decoy.

In this way, Bush managed to demonise Bin Laden in the eyes of the Americans which gave him an excuse to invade Afghanistan and gain control of their heroin production.

The next stage was to invade Iraq, bomb Iran, marry Mary Magdalene and live in the South of France with the knights of ....

I think you've got it!!! Apart from demonising Bin Laden and the people who harbour him in order to provide the perfect justification for invading..... Iraq.

Phil

quote:

Originally posted by 7V:
The next stage was to invade Iraq, bomb Iran, marry Mary Magdalene and live in the South of France with the knights of ....

Oh no!
Not again!

It's a hoax, a wind-up,the mate that sent me the picture has admitted he stitched together the CCTV pictures, it took him all of 10 minutes in macromedia flash.

Beano

There's a bit of video somewhere.

The US wanted to see what would happen if someone flew an airplane into a nuclear powerplant or something similar, so they setup a rocket sled and fired an F-16 (I think) into a concrete block at around 600mph.

You can see the plane simply disintegrate.

quote:

Originally posted by 7V:
Surely the most likely scenario is that Bush arranged for a missile to be fired at the Pentagon. At the same time he destroyed and hid a Boeing 757 with its crew and passengers.

He dumped them on a remote Island and made a TV programme about them, and called it LOST. (I wonder is that's where it's going?).