Digital SLR batteries
Posted by: TomK on 14 November 2010
I'm about to buy a spare battery for my new Canon EOS 500D. A real Canon one costs over thirty quid but I can get a generic one for less than a tenner.
Does anybody have any experience of these things? To be honest I'm thinking why take a risk to save twenty five quid or so.
Any advice gratefully received.
Does anybody have any experience of these things? To be honest I'm thinking why take a risk to save twenty five quid or so.
Any advice gratefully received.
Posted on: 14 November 2010 by BigH47
I have a non-Canon battery for my EOS 350, I just use it as a temporary spare until the original one is re-charged.
Posted on: 14 November 2010 by Dungassin
Not completely relevant, but I bought a higher capacity generic battery for my Panasonic HD camcorder - never had any problem with it. Also had a high capacity generic to use with our earlier miniDV camcorder - again, no problems.
Posted on: 14 November 2010 by winkyincanada
You get what you pay for to some extent. OEM batteries are a bit overpriced, but with little risk. Nikon did have some problems a few years back, though. If you buy the cheapest after-market option, it is likely to be crap. Buy a good aftermarket one it is PROBABLY OK.
Posted on: 15 November 2010 by Steve2701
I purchased a generic 'Jessops' spare battery for the 5D along with a genuine one.
Both plus the original that came with the camers are used in exactly the same way and I cannot tell any difference.
I may be lucky, but if the spare is just a 'spare' then generic will work ok.
One thing to be aware of, dont leave a fully charged battery to just dishcharge slowy by itself with the camera turned off, they don't like it much and shortens their life - at least that's what it said on all of the batteries I have had.
Both plus the original that came with the camers are used in exactly the same way and I cannot tell any difference.
I may be lucky, but if the spare is just a 'spare' then generic will work ok.
One thing to be aware of, dont leave a fully charged battery to just dishcharge slowy by itself with the camera turned off, they don't like it much and shortens their life - at least that's what it said on all of the batteries I have had.
Posted on: 15 November 2010 by anderson.council
A few years ago I thought the battery in our Canon 300D had gone - so I bought a generic which came with a free non-Canon charger.
Turns out the original Canon battery was fine after I'd charged it with the new charger which also came with a car adapter.
I've had no problems with the generic battery either so a win-win situation. Always good to have a spare when you are out and about - especially now that it's getting colder again and the charge time drops significantly.
Cheers
Scott
Turns out the original Canon battery was fine after I'd charged it with the new charger which also came with a car adapter.
I've had no problems with the generic battery either so a win-win situation. Always good to have a spare when you are out and about - especially now that it's getting colder again and the charge time drops significantly.
Cheers
Scott
Posted on: 15 November 2010 by TomK
Thanks for the input and I've ordered a generic. My main concern was that it might cause damage by leaking or something like that but it doesn't look as though that's an issue. It's only for occasional use anyway.
Posted on: 16 November 2010 by Diccus62
I don't notice any difference between my Nikon one and my generic one. They both power the camera and they both run down quicker than i'd like.