Beatles new Let It Be-- gggggggreat!!!!
Posted by: RICHYH on 14 November 2003
I was lucky enough to get an advance copy of this the other day and can only 100% recomend it to anyone who in the slightest bit likes them.
Its fantastic and sheds even more light (if needed) on how great they were. It has such a live feel and far more in common with the White album than I ever thought before.
Its fantastic and sheds even more light (if needed) on how great they were. It has such a live feel and far more in common with the White album than I ever thought before.
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by Dobbin
Heard some bits on R4's Today prog this AM and an very much looking forward to getting the CD - what's the release date anyone?
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by Max Bass
"Excellent Smithers" . . . November 17th is the release date Dobbin. I have it on pre-order and can't wait to get my greedy musical hands on it.
PS. You do Tony the Tiger proud RichyH.
PS. You do Tony the Tiger proud RichyH.
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by RICHYH
Maxx Bass-what and who is Tony the Tiger?
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by Rasher
quote:
Originally posted by RICHYH:
Maxx Bass-what and who is Tony the Tiger?
Who is Tony The Tiger??? Where have you been man, Don't you have breakfast in Wheels???
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by u5227470736789524
Does anybody know a US release date ?
Thanks
Jeff A
Thanks
Jeff A
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by Gunnar Jansson
quote:
Originally posted by Paul A B:
Strange how they thought of doing this just before the run up to Christmas.
Must be a coincidence.....
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by count.d
quote:
Were The Beatles successful over there?
Not after Lennon suggested they were more popular than Jesus.
[This message was edited by count.d on Friday 14 November 2003 at 23.58 due to advice from Herm.]
[This message was edited by count.d on FRIDAY 14 November 2003 at 23:58.]
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by herm
You mean Jesus, son of G.
(who obviously is not as popular because he A didn't suffer B makes us suffer; even Simon & Garfunkel were more popular than G.)
(who obviously is not as popular because he A didn't suffer B makes us suffer; even Simon & Garfunkel were more popular than G.)
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by fred simon
quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Anderson:
Does anybody know a US release date ?
Thanks
Jeff A
This coming Tuesday, November 18. Can't wait.
Heard a snippet of de-Spectorized Let It Be on the radio and it was positively majestic, much more so in a genuine way than when Spector gave it faux majesty with the orchestra and chorus. Powerful guitar solo and soulful organ is plenty, thank you.
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by fred simon
quote:
Originally posted by Paul A B:
Strange how they thought of doing this just before the run up to Christmas.
Yes ... god forbid they should be smart businessmen as well as genius artists.
I don't know about you, but this is when I'd release my album if I were even a fraction as well known as they are ... wouldn't you?
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by John C
And half of them are dead too! Like jesus good business men to the last ..and after.
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by RICHYH
Max Bass, sorry to be so slow I get it now, thanks rasher. (I was thinking what does a bloke called Tony the tiger have to do with the Beatles- let it be). I gave myself a slap. cheers.
Posted on: 14 November 2003 by fred simon
quote:
Originally posted by John C:
And half of them are dead too! Like jesus good business men to the last ..and after.
Well, the other two are just looking out for their mates' estates. That's what friends are for.
Posted on: 18 November 2003 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly
I have bought the LP; lovely dark, hesvy vinyl; sounds great, the songs themselves stand up really well and I can highly recommend this if you have any interest in The Beatles
Regards
Mike
On the Yellow Brick Road and happy
Regards
Mike
On the Yellow Brick Road and happy
Posted on: 20 November 2003 by Minky
Ditto Tom. I got my copy today. This was one of the first albums I ever owned. Know it like the back of me hand. I thought the old arrangements were fine but this version (for me) turns the wick up on everything I love about these recordings and with no real downside, except maybe for the omission of "Dirty Maggie Mae" which always made me chuckle, but you can't really complain when you get that stunning version of "don't let me down" instead.
It's hard to believe that their hearts weren't in it. They certainly had me fooled. Still do.
Peace brothers
It's hard to believe that their hearts weren't in it. They certainly had me fooled. Still do.
Peace brothers
Posted on: 20 November 2003 by fred simon
quote:
Originally posted by Minky:
It's hard to believe that their hearts weren't in it. They certainly had me fooled. Still do.
Agree, strongly.
Too often, when there is conflict among members in an artistic collaboration, it is assumed by those outside (and sometimes even inside), therefore, that "their hearts weren't in it," when actually they couldn't have quelled their hearts had they wanted to. Music, and great music all the more so, is large enough to contain it all: the tension and rancor and their brotherly history and love and friendship. Not to mention their alchemical symbiosis as true artistic geniuses. Many, if not most, of the greatest artistic partnerships are rife with conflict. Art wins out.
Posted on: 20 November 2003 by woodface
It is fantastic although you have to be a fan to get the most out of it. A couple of the songs are a little bit weak but the whole hangs together. I really like the song 'Dig..', always have, even though the lyrics are rubbish it just has a great feel and even better vocal. I wonder how long it will be before the whole back catalogue gets the treatment?
Posted on: 20 November 2003 by Max Bass
gggggggreat indeed!
It's as if the red velvet curtain has been lifted to reveal the musicians and their music. This album now sounds so powerful and it rocks and "boogies" in all the right places. A very strong recommendation and one that I think holds up on its own even if you are not a Beatles fan.
"The long and winding road" is the single most dramatically changed track. IMHO it is missing the orchestral arrangement and sounds a little incomplete. Bloated Phil Spector arrangement not withstanding. Maybe this is only because I well know the original, and it would of been nice if the original had been included as The alternate track, as is done in so many of the jazz reisues.
Regards, Max
It's as if the red velvet curtain has been lifted to reveal the musicians and their music. This album now sounds so powerful and it rocks and "boogies" in all the right places. A very strong recommendation and one that I think holds up on its own even if you are not a Beatles fan.
"The long and winding road" is the single most dramatically changed track. IMHO it is missing the orchestral arrangement and sounds a little incomplete. Bloated Phil Spector arrangement not withstanding. Maybe this is only because I well know the original, and it would of been nice if the original had been included as The alternate track, as is done in so many of the jazz reisues.
Regards, Max
Posted on: 20 November 2003 by Mike Sae
Just had a cursory listen in the truck.
Sounds like they put the master tapes on a pile of wrongly set up Mana and pressed play. Especially on Long n' Winding.
But seriously, it's good fun.
Waiting for the wallofsound orchestral mix of Meet the Beatles.
Sounds like they put the master tapes on a pile of wrongly set up Mana and pressed play. Especially on Long n' Winding.
But seriously, it's good fun.
Waiting for the wallofsound orchestral mix of Meet the Beatles.
Posted on: 20 November 2003 by fred simon
quote:
Originally posted by woodface:
It is fantastic ... I wonder how long it will be before the whole back catalogue gets the treatment?
If you mean that they would release other albums in basic track form, I don't think that would ever happen. This was a unique case in that the original desire was to make a "get back to basics" album, but it was subsequently defiled by Phil Spector. This release simply restores the aesthetic intent.
Posted on: 20 November 2003 by ErikL
Perfect time to distance from Phil Spector, don't you think?
Will we also see a "Best of" release by a Jackson 4?
Will we also see a "Best of" release by a Jackson 4?
Posted on: 21 November 2003 by woodface
Sorry I should have been more explicit, by the 'treatment' I meant remastering. Whatever the rights an wrongs of the 'Naked' project the sound quality has been a revelation and it would be great to hear Sgt Pepper et al in all their glory. It would be very heavy on the wallet though.
Posted on: 21 November 2003 by JohanR
quote:
Just had a cursory listen in the truck.
Sounds like they put the master tapes on a pile of wrongly set up Mana and pressed play. Especially on Long n' Winding.
I would be very happy if the "system" in my car sounded anywhere near as if M**a had been involved. Even a wrongly set up one would be an improvement!
JohanR
Posted on: 21 November 2003 by DenisA
quote:
Originally posted by woodface:
Sorry I should have been more explicit, by the 'treatment' I meant remastering. Whatever the rights an wrongs of the 'Naked' project the sound quality has been a revelation and it would be great to hear Sgt Pepper et al in all their glory. It would be very heavy on the wallet though.
I am waiting to hear from Diverse Vinyl on the following:-
Have you discovered if the EMI Japenese Pressings are Digital Masters? (mind you I dont know if the Analog would be any good now if they exist)
Are they 180g?
Have you listened to any yet and are they ok/Good/2D4?
I will keep you posted
If they are 2D4 then it's £430 from Diverse
If anyone else has any of these LP's from Diverse, please report
Denis
Posted on: 02 January 2004 by Tarquin Maynard - Portly
Hi Denis
Any news on the above?
Regards
Mike
On the Yellow Brick Road and happy
Any news on the above?
Regards
Mike
On the Yellow Brick Road and happy