Kun-Woo Paik Plays Beethoven

Posted by: Todd A on 05 April 2008




A couple years ago I picked up the first volume of Kun-Woo Paik’s Beethoven sonata cycle, comprising sonatas from Op 31/1 through 81a. The notes indicated that the rest of the cycle would be recorded later in 2006 and 2007. Cool, I thought, since I was still buying plenty of cycles at the time. But 2006 and then 2007 came and went with no additional volumes here in the US. I’d occasionally check MDT and Amazon, but to no avail. Then a few weeks ago I broadened by search and stumbled upon Han Books in Los Angeles. It’s a Korean bookstore that imports all manner of goodies from Korea. Among the goodies it sells are all of the remaining volumes of the cycle. Decca released the cycle in three additional 2-disc sets rather than two 3-disc sets, but there it was. (The additional volumes are also available in France I later found, though the box-set is not.)

Also there was the complete set in a nifty looking super digi-pac box more reminiscent of LP box-sets than CD box-sets. Though I had the first volume, I decided to go for the complete box because it looks so nifty and because it comes with a DVD and because the sonatas are presented chronologically and because it’s a limited, numbered edition. (Mine’s number 2229.) And it’s not too expensive – around $114 with shipping. Once I got the box it became apparent this set is for the Korean market only. The generous book (not booklet) is detailed and physically large – and all in Korean, save the French intro by the pianist. The included DVD is a low-rent affair, with blah camera work, blah image quality, and no subtitles for people who don’t speak French or Korean. But that’s irrelevant, really – it’s all about the music.

When I wrote about the first volume, I noted that I thought it was a mixed bag: Some sonatas were superbly played, some not, though Kun-Woo’s technical mastery was evident throughout, as was his emotional detachment. Opp 31/3, 57, 78, and 54 came off best, and I surmised that the pianist would fare better in the early sonatas than the late sonatas. Well, after hearing the whole cycle, it’s clear that it is a mixed bag overall, and my initial hunch was right – Kun-Woo is better in the early sonatas than the late ones.

Rather than go into detail, I’ll just cover the set in very broad strokes. The earliest sonatas generally fare well. Crisp, light, lithe playing characterizes much of the set, and some sonatas, like Op 2/3, Op 7, and the two Op 14 sonatas all benefit greatly. The pianist’s comparative detachment doesn’t detract at all here, and the generally high energy playing really sounds fine. The recorded sound doesn’t offer the last word in clarity, and Kun-Woo’s playing isn’t the clearest, most differentiated around, but it’s quite fine. Unfortunately, the meatier early works don’t fare as well. Op 10/3 comes off as too lightweight for me, with not a whole lot of drama or passion in the great slow movement. Op 13 fares better, with the briskly played opener having a bit of oomph. The last of the early sonatas (or the first of the middle, depending on how you look at), Op 22, is taken at a slightly broader tempo than I would have anticipated, but still has enough verve and variety to satisfy.

The middle sonatas find Kun-Woo doing some fine things. Op 26 is surprisingly effective, delivered in a taut, slightly cool fashion, with the Funeral March poked out in a small-ish scale but edgy enough fashion. Op 27/1 possesses enough energy and drive to satisfy, and Op 28 is lyrical, smooth, and quite charming. The middle of the middle I’ve covered in more detail, but revisiting the sonatas found me enjoying Op 31/1 a bit more, and now I must say that 31/3 is top-flight stuff. The Appasionata reminds me of an updated version of Robert Casadesus’ formidable take on the work, and Op 54 still stands as a unique take, with a blistering fast Allegretto.

The late sonatas are less satisfying. The first thing I noticed about the late sonatas, which here start with Op 90, is that the recorded sound is different – and not as good. It’s more distant, more resonant, more muffled, and more metallic. It’s still modern sound, it’s just not as good as the rest of the set. Anyway, Op 90 sounds quite nice, especially the second, proto-Schubertian movement with its flowing lyricism. Op 101 is a miss, though. It never really evokes the late-LvB sound world for me. Less satisfying yet is the mighty Hammerklavier. Though Kun-Woo definitely has the chops to play it fast, he instead plays it very slow, emphasizing the quasi-orchestral, grand nature of the music. The slow movement lacks enough gravitas, to boot. The last three sonatas improve a bit, though all lack the ultimate degree of late Beethoven gravitas. Op 111 probably fares best of all, with the pianist playing with decent drive and bite in the opener and allowing himself personal leeway in the slow movement, delivering a very fine Arietta, blurred, beautiful trills, and some nearly transcendental playing at times.

Overall, this is not a great cycle in my estimation. But it is a slightly better than above average one overall. Compared to the most recent complete cycles and some on-going ones, I’d definitely have to say he’s closer in quality to Barenboim’s superb DVD cycle than he is to Paul Lewis’ rather dull cycle, though Barenboim rather handily delivers more of everything that counts most. Kun-Woo is uneven like Andras Schiff, though he even more rarely delivers the brilliant insights that Schiff sometimes does. He’s nimbler and more individual than Ikuyo Nakamichi, though she plays rather more beautifully. (And Kun-Woo’s playing is itself rather distinguished tonally.) He lacks the seriousness and weight of Craig Sheppard, though he’s more flexible. He tinkers more with tempi and dynamics than Akiyoshi Sako, but his vision is less compelling, solid, and certain. And he definitely doesn’t aggressively present his ideas like Ronald Brautigam, and sometimes there’s less excitement as a result. Overall, this is a fine cycle, one I’m glad to have, and one I’ll return to with pleasure, but I must seek out others for more meaningful Beethoven.


-
Posted on: 16 April 2008 by Todd A
quote:
Originally posted by Florestan:
In regards to the comments above about some performers being "hit and miss" etc. that is true of everything



I partly agree and partly disagree here. For me, what separates the best Beethoven pianists from the rest (and the same applies to other composers' music too, of course) is that the best have far more hits than misses. Indeed, their "misses" may be better than lesser artists' best efforts.

I'm thinking of Kempff, Gulda, Backhaus, Annie Fischer, Silverman, Sherman, Gilels, or Heidsieck here: they are compelling in every work, even if I don't like everything about the recording. Most pianists don't have that type of quality. Thinking again of Schiff - and I'm an admittedly big fan of Schiff - he's definitely not compelling across the board. Some of his Beethoven recordings just don't do it for me, though his best really are superb.

Everyone is human, and waxes and wanes qualitatively, to be sure, it's just that some operate at a higher level all the time.


--
Posted on: 17 April 2008 by Florestan
Tam,
I have found the "classical threads worth reading" and I find it amazing at what a wealth of information is contained in it. Thank you so much for taking the time to compile this handy resource for us all.

Thanks to George, Tam, Todd and the many others who have contributed so prolifically along the way as I have a lot of reading and learning and catching up to do. It's too bad that many (if not all) of the topics are now closed though. I find that besides learning something new I often come upon a topic which leads me to want to ask a further question about something or seek clarification of an idea or even add something of my own (to surely confuse the matter!) on topics that interest me.

Regards,
Doug
Posted on: 17 April 2008 by Florestan
Dear George,
I forgot to mentions thanks for the reminder about Claudio Arrau. I had been thinking about getting his complete Beethoven for sometime now and will put it nearer the top of my list now. I have a Philips recording (that I found this morning) only with the Pastoral, Waldstein, and Les Adieux only (which I have even forgot that I had). I do have his Debussy Preludes and his Chopin box set on Philips as well and think he is outstanding as well.

Doug
Posted on: 17 April 2008 by fidelio
quote:
Originally posted by Oldnslow:
Saw Schiff play the Waldstein about a year ago in Seattle. Wasn't bad, but kinda low wattage. He also stopped in the middle of the first movement to castigate the audience for coughing (it was in the winter after all). I thought that was bush league. If he tried that in Moscow he'd be lucky to have escaped from the concert hall....)


interesting. in the first schiff beethoven sonata installment (late last year?), someone had a heart attack or something and he left the stage as the paramedics showed up. he could have just been circumspect, but said something cold like "i can't continue while this is going on; let me know when you have dealt with it, and i will come back."

anyway, "low wattage" is descriptive of what i heard - not necessarily bad, but perhaps not what is expected w/ beethoven. i see opinion is mixed (as my own is, i guess), but it does appear the man is mostly consistent in his style, gauging the reactions of those who've heard him around the world. it's great to have a forum where such discussion is possible.

on the issue of live vs. studio stuff, i feel it is critical, just speaking for myself, to hear as much live music as possible. i especially asppreciate student orchestras and senior recitals, as it really brings the music alive to me to witness the struggle to perform a dificult piece.

wonder if schiff has recorded bach, and if so, what it is like?

finally, i'll keep my eyes open for arrau's beethoven -- i assume there must be a couple of recordings floating around.

best to all, artie
Posted on: 17 April 2008 by Tam
quote:
Originally posted by GFFJ:
Thanks for the lead! I did not realise this was still avaiable! George


Dear George,

The set is a recent reissue.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Brahms-Orchestral-Carlo-Maria-G...id=1208456423&sr=1-1


What it highlights most for me is the shocking unavailability of some of Giulini's recordings. In this case his cycle of the Brahms symphonies with Philharmonia.

regards, Tam
Posted on: 17 April 2008 by u5227470736789439
Dear Tam,

Ordered from that source. My first internet purchase, except for aeroplane tickets!

ATB from George
Posted on: 18 April 2008 by Tam
Dear George,

I'll be interesting to hear your thoughts. I e-mailed EMI last night to ask why the symphonies aren't available and have had a response that they have passed it onto the department that deals with reissues, so we will see if anything comes of it (I'm not holding my breath though).

regards, Tam