Sistem pics 2003
Posted by: Steve Toy on 14 January 2003
Here are a few crappy pics. I've got some of Stallion's rig too, but I await his permission to post them.
I need to get the file size down. I see that we now get 50k
Regards,
Steve.
[This message was edited by Steven Toy on TUESDAY 14 January 2003 at 18:06.]
I need to get the file size down. I see that we now get 50k
Regards,
Steve.
[This message was edited by Steven Toy on TUESDAY 14 January 2003 at 18:06.]
Peter,
where is da garrard?
Jean-Marc
where is da garrard?
Jean-Marc
Posting on behalf of Silk.
Silk - 2.
Some nice pics going on here - all much better than mine.
Keep 'em coming...
A number of folks I've spoke to about this thread suggested that it may encourage burglars.
My response was that even the vermin can read - they won't wait around for the pics. Keep you home address secret, and have a Mick P-like shotgun at the ready
Discussion point: Should mere lurking only be available to vetted and signed up members?
Regards,
Steve.
Keep 'em coming...
A number of folks I've spoke to about this thread suggested that it may encourage burglars.
My response was that even the vermin can read - they won't wait around for the pics. Keep you home address secret, and have a Mick P-like shotgun at the ready
Discussion point: Should mere lurking only be available to vetted and signed up members?
Regards,
Steve.
Alex,
That's a fine looking stack there, and even better for what it sits on.
However, get that XPS as far away from that 82 as possible.
Do not underestimate what this will do either.
Allowing the preamp to breathe - well away from brawny components like the XPS, the Hi-cap, and the 250 will enable it to process those high-frequency signals with lower distortion. The result will be a sweeter top end, and a more focused image.
You need a spacer shelf to achieve this. If you think a 6-tier is getting a bit too wobbly, then you'll need either to build two racks side by side, or get a QS Ref. wallshelf for the CDX.
Regards,
Steve.
[This message was edited by Steven Toy on MONDAY 20 January 2003 at 02:28.]
That's a fine looking stack there, and even better for what it sits on.
However, get that XPS as far away from that 82 as possible.
Do not underestimate what this will do either.
Allowing the preamp to breathe - well away from brawny components like the XPS, the Hi-cap, and the 250 will enable it to process those high-frequency signals with lower distortion. The result will be a sweeter top end, and a more focused image.
You need a spacer shelf to achieve this. If you think a 6-tier is getting a bit too wobbly, then you'll need either to build two racks side by side, or get a QS Ref. wallshelf for the CDX.
Regards,
Steve.
[This message was edited by Steven Toy on MONDAY 20 January 2003 at 02:28.]
quote:
As a photographer you are no great shakes. And your constant whining that it's not fair someone should say so,
I said in the very first post in this thread that my pics were crap. I never had any issue with anyone speaking the truth on that score.
Herm,
Pay attention!
Marco,
Yes, it's a result
(just waiting for "Bambam" (sleeper cell #2/?) to be ba...) so back to the plot, and let's see some more pics. I'm sure that they'll all be better than mine.Keep 'em coming...
Regards,
Steve.
Herm,
Is that how your computer recognises UBB code, or whatever?
[ b ] ... [ /b] becomes -- ... -- (?)
Regards,
Steve.
Is that how your computer recognises UBB code, or whatever?
[ b ] ... [ /b] becomes -- ... -- (?)
Regards,
Steve.
just messing with your mind, Steve