Advanced search

XRCD vs. Prestige 20th Anniversary 20 bit recordings.....

Posted by: Will on 26 July 2001

So, I am trying to update my jazz collection, and am trying to update some of my old (circa 1987) jazz CD pressings with some of the newer remasters. Much of the music I am looking for is available in both the JVC XRCD process and the Prestige 20th Anniversary series, both of which use the JVC K2 20 bit mastering process. Does anybody know if the XRCD versions add anything over the 20th Anniversary versions?

Also, has anybody done direct comparisons between these two processes? I already own a couple of each, and much prefer the remasters to the originals, but I don't have any recordings in which I have copies of both the XRCD and 20th anniversary versions to compare.

The XRCD's cost about twice as much as the 20th anniversary series discs, but for some of the classic recordings, I don't mind paying a little extra if there is a difference.

Thanks in advance.

Posted on: 26 July 2001 by Former member
Will,

I will offer my opinion and attempt to compare the Miles Davis "Relaxing" CD transfers. I am comparing the Red Book transer, against the Prestige limited edition transfer, against the JVC XRCD edition.

The red book has a higher gain (loudness or volume
increase introduced into the transfer process) than the JVC. This is also true of the Prestige transfer. The red book and Presitge are close in terms of transfer gain. This results in the JVC having a softer or more relaxed sound at the same volume setting compared to the others.

The Prestige beats the Red Book in terms of presence, tightness, and the reproduction of the higer and lower registers.

In other words, the Prestige is better than the Red Book CD.

Now for what you asked for. You will play the JVC
at a higher volume setting on your system to match
the same level of presence you would have had your
Prestige set at. The Prestige will sound more sharp and almost becoming etched at a very high level of volume than you would have played the JVC at.

I prefer the Prestige recording because of the
enhanced detail and presence. While you may appear to be able to crank the JVC up to a much higher level w/o offense, it does not provide the same bandwidth and presence.

The JVC clearly produces a much more pleasurable reproduction of the piano, while the Prestige
is much better on the trumpet and stringed bass.
In this case, the main attraction is Miles Davis.

I also clearly enjoy the Bill Evan's "DCC" gold cd recordings over the JVC.

At a higher price, you get a better package and
a "Tube" like sound, with limited bandwidth, from the JVC.

I personnally have bought as many of the different Prestige CDs that I could find while they are still available w/o paying collector prices(I assume your are refering to the limited
edition Prestige anniversary cds).

Both are good and offering different advantages and disadvantages. I hope my response has potentially helped you choose which one may be best for you.

Lee

Posted on: 27 July 2001 by woodface
I think the cost of these enhanced CD's is far too high for the performance on offer. True they are better but no way worth double the money. I suppose they have a more vinyl type sound with a greater sense of realism; in the end I have found very few remasters that do what they say!
Posted on: 29 July 2001 by Former member
While I generally agree with Woodface, with some
exceptions of course, I beleive in this case the
Prestige 2oth's are the same price as a Red Book
cd. At least they are in the states.

If you can still find them, I would buy them over
the others.

Lee