Cable dressing, stands and tweaking...

Posted by: Top Cat on 23 January 2002

Hi folks.

After a break from the forum (a month, give or take, due mainly to my lack of internet access), I'm back, and my system is finally getting to where I want it to be. I finally upgraded from the Mana supports to a QS Reference ensemble, which I will come onto later. Suffice to say that it has brought some tangible improvements over Mana Phase 8, although I feel there is still room for improvement.

However, the biggest change in my system of late has been finally getting some decent wire - replacing the fine-at-the-price- but-ultimately-a-bit-limiting DNM solid core with some Nordost stuff. Whether you personally love or hate it, I have to say that the Nordost wire certainly makes a difference, more so than either the Mana or the QS Reference racks did. In my system, it has resulted in a MUCH faster but also more musical sound - but then, I would expect it of a pricy wire. Whether additional improvement may be wrought by careful dressing is difficult to say, so I thought I'd see if anyone has any tips on cable dressing, such as:

* can I group interconnects from difference components together (e.g. with, say, an Ikea cable-tidy) or should I keep them apart?
* does having a cable rest against the rack or another cable or bit of equipment really matter?
* if an interconnect has to pass over a power cable, do I assume that right-angles are the best solution?

...and so on. I've tried a few things, but ultimately it is pretty tricky getting the cables routed in the right way due to space and kit-location.

Next up: Nordost Pulsar Points. I borrowed a set but they didn't do much for any of my kit - has anyone else here had any luck with them? I mean, I think they're very well made and all, but surely if I can't hear any benefit then they're just cosmetic distraction and nothing more?

QS Ref versus Mana. Don't want to ignite the debate, but I can confirm that QS Ref suits my kind of system better than Mana did, and at lower cost, but YMMV. Under the speakers, the custom Mana bases are very good indeed, although they make an already tall speaker that bit taller. I will keep the custom stands and sell my pair of soundbases (actually flattops with boards on them) - anyone want them for £180 including courier to your neck of the woods?). I also have a PSU table should anyone be interested.

Tweaking: I was delighted to find out that Naim-wired DIN plugs work just fine on a DNM preamp - my question now is, if they work just fine in this way, what benefit would having them wired up in a DNM manner (i.e. ++00u (left to right, as compared to Naim's ++0uu, where u is unused)?
Obviously comparison is going to be a bit tricky, so has anyone ever tried (for instance) the reverse, i.e. a split ground DIN on a Naim) - did this work?

Ah well, I'm delighted to be back - just had the boys from Telewest install my cable modem and it's great! Surf away!!!

TC '..'
"Girl, you thought he was a man, but he was a Muffin..."

Posted on: 23 January 2002 by dave simpson
Yer right mate! Blu-tak wouldn't cut the mustard in this situation. To malleable. I like the eraser idea though. Now that I'm done with homework and my NAT 101 just arrived from ICU at NANA....time to gather my erasers and ST-2!


see ya,

dave

Posted on: 23 January 2002 by garyi
Yes, I guess in the end you are right, but as I said before the anthems look good big grin

Actually you can hear a difference, hence why I sold the nordost, and why I continue to use the anthem. However in IMO it tends to be different not better.

I had a sound engineer for the BBC round yesterday to purchase my 90/92 (boo hoo no music for a few weeks) and he had some interesting insights.

His best point was, (and one which I have mentioned on another fourm) is that you can spend all the money in the world but you should see the crap conditions/equipment most our CDs are recorded in big grin big grin

At most all you can do is hear all that crap, snigger.