Can you read this?
Posted by: NaimThatTune on 04 December 2005
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was
rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a
rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it denos't mtater in waht
oredr the ltetres in a wrod are, the olny iprnoatmt tihng is
taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset
can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm.
Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by
istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas
tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
This slowed my usual reading speed a little, but I noticed two things:
I didn't have look at any words twice to work out what they were,
I found that I could speed up my reading as I went through the text, to almost nomral speed by the time I got to the end.
Isn't the brain an amazing thing?
Cheers!
Rich.Posted on: 04 December 2005 by Spock
No Prbolem. Intreseting psot.
I found I could easily read first time through at normal seepd.
Spock
Posted on: 04 December 2005 by kuma
Yep.
I can read it no problem.
A friend told me that if the first and the last letters are correct, the sentense still can be understood.
I'm sure that it gives a spelling nazi a twitch, however.
Posted on: 04 December 2005 by NaimThatTune
Thanks for reading and commenting, fellas. I snuck in a little extra facet as a little experiment - did either of you even notice that I'd written the word 'normal' as 'nomral' in the 'plain text' section?
Even after such a short familiarisation period, you might have adapted to not even notice the 'dbieeratle msiatke'.
Cheers!
Rich
Posted on: 04 December 2005 by kuma
quote:
did either of you even notice that I'd written the word 'normal' as 'nomral' in the 'plain text' section?
If you did I haven't noticed.
I have a tendency to tranpose letters and I don't even see it.
Posted on: 04 December 2005 by joe90
Accurate spelling and grammar is certainly not necessary for communication, but it sure does make language beautiful for its own sake.
Posted on: 05 December 2005 by NaimThatTune
Hmm,
Just got to thinking, are there any words in any language that are anagrams of each other AND have the same first and last letter? If so, then it would be possible that the messed-up version would be ambiguous, as it could 'translate' back to one of two (or more)different 'roots'.
Any wordsmiths out there know of such a collection of words?
Joe - not advocating that we should go around jumbling up letters for the sake of it, but it certainly interests me that we can read this mess so easily.
Kuma - maybe not so bad that you transpose the odd letter - this shows it won't impede comprehension - just don't get the first or last letter wrong!
Cheers!
Rich
Posted on: 05 December 2005 by TomK
Good point NTT. This is interesting but shouldn't be regarded as a licence to throw spelling and grammar out the window. Correct spelling and grammar are the best way of maximising the chances of getting your message across.
I'm sure there must be loads of words like you mention but unfortunately I can't think of any smart examples offhand. Fiend and fined, board and broad etc. Confusing penis and pines could have interesting consequences.
Posted on: 05 December 2005 by NaimThatTune
Hi Tom,
Arf! Good examples - I couldn't think of any words straight off the top of my head earlier, but then it occurred to me that in Bath there is a road (leading to Sainsbury's) called Pines Way - I certainly did a double take and had a smirk when I first went there!!
Yes, this wasn't meant as a justification of using incorrect spelling, but its good to know that if you do jumble up a few letters its not the end of the world.
I would guess that in most cases, the context and structure of the language should still make it possible to unravel the correct sentence:
The fnied fnied the barod for atctanikg his peins with a barod mdae form a from of tere kwonn as the peins!!
I'll get my coat...
Rich.
Posted on: 06 December 2005 by Bob McC
I thought it was just the normal level of competence found on this forum.
Posted on: 06 December 2005 by NaimThatTune
Hi Folks,
Another little test I sneaked into the above text. Did you find that you had trouble with the word 'researcher' more than any other in the original jumbled-up text? You may have read it as 'research' and wondered why it apparently said 'a research at Cambridge' rather than 'a research
er at Cambridge'.
That particular word doesn't end in the r that it should do, to comply with the rule for keeping first and last letter in place, but instead ends in h which may have made your brain resolve the word 'research' instead of 'researcher'.
Again, I'll get my coat - I clearly need to get out more...
Regards,
Rich.
Posted on: 08 December 2005 by Shayman
Yup sure did!!!
My flow was completely broken up by the word 'researcher'.
Amazing!!!
Jonathan
Posted on: 08 December 2005 by NaimThatTune
Hi Jonathan,
Yes, both the puzzle and the brain are pretty impressive!
Now I'm angry at myself because I realise I also 'broke' the word 'researcher' when I was fiddling with it - it should have the letter e three times and it only has it twice.
Now I'll never be quite as confident that the reason it gave you trouble was because of the last letter being wrong, the wrong number of letters, or a bit of both. Maybe I'll have to wait 6 months and try this concept out again!
Best regards,
Rich.