Nait 5 can drive NBLs - official
Posted by: JeremyB on 01 June 2003
Or so it would seem. Anyone seen the latest "Absolute Sound"?
Apart from it being Editors Choice, they say about Nait 5:
The Nait 5 is something special. It delivers such a large slice of what high-end audio is about, so much musical pleasure, that more than being just a component for review, the latest Nait is the kind of product I could easily live with over the long haul, enjoying disc after disc while other audiophiles chase after some-thing newer and better.
But there's more: Absolute Sounds Recommended System 7 is the CD5, Nait 5 and...Wilson Audio Sophia Speakers!
Apparently, since the Sophias have a sensitivity of 89dB they are an ideal match for the Nait 5 if you can get past the speakers costing $11,700 with the CD5 and amp less than $4000.
So...NBLs at 92dB and $12,350 should be more than ideal, right?

Jeremy
Apart from it being Editors Choice, they say about Nait 5:
The Nait 5 is something special. It delivers such a large slice of what high-end audio is about, so much musical pleasure, that more than being just a component for review, the latest Nait is the kind of product I could easily live with over the long haul, enjoying disc after disc while other audiophiles chase after some-thing newer and better.
But there's more: Absolute Sounds Recommended System 7 is the CD5, Nait 5 and...Wilson Audio Sophia Speakers!
Apparently, since the Sophias have a sensitivity of 89dB they are an ideal match for the Nait 5 if you can get past the speakers costing $11,700 with the CD5 and amp less than $4000.
So...NBLs at 92dB and $12,350 should be more than ideal, right?
Jeremy
Posted on: 01 June 2003 by NB
Quote:-
So...NBLs at 92dB and $12,350 should be more than ideal, right?
___________________________________________________________
In theory Jeremy yes the Nait will power a pair of NBL's but how will it sound?
Anyone tried it?
Regards
NB
So...NBLs at 92dB and $12,350 should be more than ideal, right?
___________________________________________________________
In theory Jeremy yes the Nait will power a pair of NBL's but how will it sound?
Anyone tried it?
Regards
NB
Posted on: 01 June 2003 by woody
A friend of mine, who is a true "round-earther" with his Musical Fidelity kit, raised his eyebrows when I told him I was buying a NAIT. "An integrated? 30 wpc? nah don't do it".
After he'd heard it, he went very quiet!

- Andrew
After he'd heard it, he went very quiet!
- Andrew
Posted on: 01 June 2003 by Greg Beatty
Not only are NBLs 92db efficient, they are a relatively benign load in terms of impedence. I would expect the Nait to drive them as well or better than my Allaes or Intros.
I've wondered when Naim recommends amp/speaker combinations as in, "A 150 is the minimum with Allaes" if what they are saying is that they would recommend that the funds be distributed in such-and-sucn a manner rather than there is some magic threshold in driving speakers that a 150 crosses and a Nait 5 does not.
- GregB
- GregB
Insert Witty Signature Line Here
I've wondered when Naim recommends amp/speaker combinations as in, "A 150 is the minimum with Allaes" if what they are saying is that they would recommend that the funds be distributed in such-and-sucn a manner rather than there is some magic threshold in driving speakers that a 150 crosses and a Nait 5 does not.
- GregB
- GregB
Insert Witty Signature Line Here
Posted on: 01 June 2003 by Tuan
quote:
Originally posted by JeremyB:
Or so it would seem. Anyone seen the latest "Absolute Sound"?
Apart from it being Editors Choice, they say about Nait 5:
The Nait 5 is something special. It delivers such a large slice of what high-end audio is about, so much musical pleasure, that more than being just a component for review, the latest Nait is the kind of product I could easily live with over the long haul, enjoying disc after disc while other audiophiles chase after some-thing newer and better.
But there's more: Absolute Sounds Recommended System 7 is the CD5, Nait 5 and...Wilson Audio Sophia Speakers!
Apparently, since the Sophias have a sensitivity of 89dB they are an ideal match for the Nait 5 if you can get past the speakers costing $11,700 with the CD5 and amp less than $4000.
So...NBLs at 92dB and $12,350 should be more than ideal, right?
Jeremy
Dont be fooled.... the Sophia model needs a pair of 135s as the minimum requirement. I went this route with my NAP250 already.
Posted on: 01 June 2003 by Tuan
quote:
Originally posted by mad max:
To all, especially tuan
All your reservations about the nait would be put to rest if you heard a nait5 drive quad 988's, then try to drive the same quads with mark levinsons mono amps. Just do the demo, then report back.
max
yeah... Max now I know you are really mad.
Posted on: 01 June 2003 by John Sheridan
quote:
So...NBLs at 92dB and $12,350 should be more than ideal, right?
my Nait 1 has no problems with DBLs...
Posted on: 01 June 2003 by Martin Payne
NAIT2 works fine with DBLs, too.
cheers, Martin
E-mail:- MartinPayne at Dial.Pipex.com
cheers, Martin
E-mail:- MartinPayne at Dial.Pipex.com
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Andrew L. Weekes
When I heard the first 112 / 150's doing the rounds, it was driving NBL's.
I was stunned how good it sounded, despite the revealing nature of the speakers. With IBL's, which are every bit as good musically, it doesn't show it's limitations.
It's simply just a poor use of resources to put NBL's with such an inexpensive front end.
Andy.
I was stunned how good it sounded, despite the revealing nature of the speakers. With IBL's, which are every bit as good musically, it doesn't show it's limitations.
It's simply just a poor use of resources to put NBL's with such an inexpensive front end.
Andy.
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Philip Pang
Humble Naits They're Not. 
Another interesting post, this is. I did toy with this seemingly bizzare idea of pairing a Nait 5 with say, SL2s, or the DBLs as possible amp-speaker configurations since the speakers' highish sensitivities permitted such a pairing, but in the end it bored down to system balance and whether the components would be optimally matched to play off each other, to which the answer was (sadly) obvious. Still I daresay you could have alot of fun with a Nait 5-SL2 configuration, so whatever makes you happy listening to the music...
From my auditions with the Nait 5 on a few occasions, it is something special. It had a fundamental rightness, a coherence to the sound which connected me straight to the music, and a very quick swap to a 112/150/FC surprisingly didn't seem on first listen to be as explicit an improvement as I'd expected. In my audition, my ears preferred the 5, but the mind quickly said "What hogwash!", so it remains a question of whether you trust your ears.
You pay only a fraction of the cost of Naim's references, for "the baby integrated", but performance wise, it certainly delivers the goods, and sounds distinctly musical, and certainly not wanting in any respect, provided the volume's kept within 11 o-clock, maybe 12, but that would be stretching it, I think. Absolute power aside, the Nait 5 definitely takes on more expensive competitors at 2, 3, even 4 times the cost as a package, in terms of its sheer musicality and ability to connect to the music, cent for cent.
I once sat down with one of the ex-directors of Absolute Sound for an audition many years ago, a simple audition I remember to this day. What he did was to swap to a Nait 2 from the formidable 52/135s, with a CDS fronting the passive SBL based system for the comparitive demo. I was sitting there expecting a huge downward shift in the musical quality, and he just walked right back to his seat beside me, and casually asked, with a slightly raised eyebrow, "Tell me you find the Nait wanting in any way. Any difference?" Well, of course there were differences, BUT it was only after some time. His point was that even with a "humble Nait" (and humble it's certainly isn't!
), you could enjoy the sheer emotion of the music without making any significant compromises to the listening experience, or your wallet, and that, for him, to him, was what mattered most at the end of the day. To be brutally honest, the moment he did that swap, my ears couldn't tell a marked, significant difference (and we'd been listening for some time prior this comparative demo), so the jaw did drop a little in amazement,with the mind refusing to register what the ears were conveying. It's not surprising, because we had a repeat of this comparision only this year, with a Nait 5 in tow this time, against the still formidable 52/SC/135s... and it WASN'T a foregone conclusion either.
I still want that 552/500, but a Nait 5 would do just as fine.
Good listening all, the music's groovin' frightfully more.
Rgds
Philip
naimniac for life
[This message was edited by Philip Pang on MONDAY 02 June 2003 at 12:09.]
Another interesting post, this is. I did toy with this seemingly bizzare idea of pairing a Nait 5 with say, SL2s, or the DBLs as possible amp-speaker configurations since the speakers' highish sensitivities permitted such a pairing, but in the end it bored down to system balance and whether the components would be optimally matched to play off each other, to which the answer was (sadly) obvious. Still I daresay you could have alot of fun with a Nait 5-SL2 configuration, so whatever makes you happy listening to the music...
From my auditions with the Nait 5 on a few occasions, it is something special. It had a fundamental rightness, a coherence to the sound which connected me straight to the music, and a very quick swap to a 112/150/FC surprisingly didn't seem on first listen to be as explicit an improvement as I'd expected. In my audition, my ears preferred the 5, but the mind quickly said "What hogwash!", so it remains a question of whether you trust your ears.
You pay only a fraction of the cost of Naim's references, for "the baby integrated", but performance wise, it certainly delivers the goods, and sounds distinctly musical, and certainly not wanting in any respect, provided the volume's kept within 11 o-clock, maybe 12, but that would be stretching it, I think. Absolute power aside, the Nait 5 definitely takes on more expensive competitors at 2, 3, even 4 times the cost as a package, in terms of its sheer musicality and ability to connect to the music, cent for cent.
I once sat down with one of the ex-directors of Absolute Sound for an audition many years ago, a simple audition I remember to this day. What he did was to swap to a Nait 2 from the formidable 52/135s, with a CDS fronting the passive SBL based system for the comparitive demo. I was sitting there expecting a huge downward shift in the musical quality, and he just walked right back to his seat beside me, and casually asked, with a slightly raised eyebrow, "Tell me you find the Nait wanting in any way. Any difference?" Well, of course there were differences, BUT it was only after some time. His point was that even with a "humble Nait" (and humble it's certainly isn't!
I still want that 552/500, but a Nait 5 would do just as fine.
Good listening all, the music's groovin' frightfully more.
Rgds
Philip
naimniac for life
[This message was edited by Philip Pang on MONDAY 02 June 2003 at 12:09.]
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Maxi Me
quote:
It's not surprising, because we had a repeat of this comparision only this year, with a Nait 5 in tow this time, against the still formidable 52/SC/135s... and it WASN'T a foregone conclusion either.
I still want that 552/500, but a Nait 5 would do just as fine.
Thanks Philip, as a new owner of CD5, FC2, Nait5 plus Ruark Prelude 2's your post has really cheered me up, I may even be able to fight off 'upgraditis'
Seth
Is Naim the only way forward?
Ahh, Ahh! I'm burning!!
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Greg Beatty
I'm not sure its so easy as favorable->forum members endorse the review, unfavorable->forum members diss the review.
I believe the forum members are a tad more discerning than that. Consider a (hypothetical) review that reads like this:
"The Nait 5 is the most impressive integrated amp we have ever heard. The imaging has to be heard to be believed - we could pinpoint every music stand in the orchestra - every key on the piano soloist's keyboard. Its a shame the Nait doesn't have drive or communicate the sense of what the musicians are doing, but there are more important things. I have never heard Dianna Krall sound so 'in my room' as when using the Nait 5."
I dare say many on this forum would loose their lunch over such a 'favorable' review.
- GregB
Insert Witty Signature Line Here
I believe the forum members are a tad more discerning than that. Consider a (hypothetical) review that reads like this:
"The Nait 5 is the most impressive integrated amp we have ever heard. The imaging has to be heard to be believed - we could pinpoint every music stand in the orchestra - every key on the piano soloist's keyboard. Its a shame the Nait doesn't have drive or communicate the sense of what the musicians are doing, but there are more important things. I have never heard Dianna Krall sound so 'in my room' as when using the Nait 5."
I dare say many on this forum would loose their lunch over such a 'favorable' review.
- GregB
Insert Witty Signature Line Here
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Mekon
Recalling my social identity theory lectures, that would be because we are trying to maintain the identity of the group.
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by coredump
quote:
Originally posted by hockman:
You would think that certain amp and speaker matches are obvious, but in real life they are not. I once heard a Nait 3 choking on a pair of IBLs, while my tiny wattage OTO drives them happily (as long as the vol is not too loud).
[...]
Hock
I drive a pair of IBLs using a Nait3/HiCap, it never choked so far, they even seem to be a far easier load then the ES11 I had before. Maybe the room was too big?
Best regards,
Oliver
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by woody
quote:
Originally posted by Maxi Me:quote:
It's not surprising, because we had a repeat of this comparision only this year, with a Nait 5 in tow this time, against the still formidable 52/SC/135s... and it WASN'T a foregone conclusion either.
I still want that 552/500, but a Nait 5 would do just as fine.
Thanks Philip, as a new owner of CD5, FC2, Nait5 plus Ruark Prelude 2's your post has really cheered me up, I may even be able to fight off 'upgraditis'
Seth
_Is Naim the only way forward?
Ahh, Ahh! I'm burning!!_
You've only just got it - enjoy it!
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by JohnMak
As somebody already mentioned in this thread. "if they say nice things about the gear we love, it's a great review ...... if they say something bad ..... the reveiwer is biased or whatever.
Do not forget that several years ago (I think 1998 TAS gave the Nait a good review but criticised the cost stating it contained $40 dollars worth of parts and couldn't cost more than $40 dollars to assemble" Look up oneof mey earlier posts where I quoted the issue number.
I'm not saying the Nait is not a good amp ... all I'm saying is that as per all Magazine reveiws, their opinion is not worth a Knob of goat shit.
Do not forget that several years ago (I think 1998 TAS gave the Nait a good review but criticised the cost stating it contained $40 dollars worth of parts and couldn't cost more than $40 dollars to assemble" Look up oneof mey earlier posts where I quoted the issue number.
I'm not saying the Nait is not a good amp ... all I'm saying is that as per all Magazine reveiws, their opinion is not worth a Knob of goat shit.
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Maxi Me
quote:
You've only just got it - enjoy it!
Ooh, I am, I am!
Seth
Is Naim the only way forward?
Ahh, Ahh! I'm burning!!
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Mr_Sukebe
Well my Nait 5 seems to be happily driving a rather inefficient pair of Linn Kabers, rated at 86db/w. Not that I listen to them at killer levels, but still sounds amazing. Even more so with the addition of a hicap.
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Linds
What's the official Naim line on all of this then? Is the increased power reserve of 112/150 etc over the Nait 5 important in driving Naim's speakers? Surely it can't just be down to a calculation of sensitivity and number of watts output?
Come on Naim, why are Allæs quoted as requiring minimum 112/150 i.e. Nait 5 won't do?
!!! There's always money somewhere for the next upgrade... !!!
Come on Naim, why are Allæs quoted as requiring minimum 112/150 i.e. Nait 5 won't do?
!!! There's always money somewhere for the next upgrade... !!!
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Minky
If I thought that a Nait could make as good a job of driving my NBL's as my much more expensive rig I would do it in a flash (actually I would have to do it without a flash), but judging by the difference between say a 52 and a 552 I somehow doubt it.
Nice thought though ..
Nice thought though ..
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Tuan
quote:
Originally posted by Linds:
What's the official Naim line on all of this then? Is the increased power reserve of 112/150 etc over the Nait 5 important in driving Naim's speakers? Surely it can't just be down to a calculation of sensitivity and number of watts output?
Come on Naim, why _are_ Allæs quoted as requiring minimum 112/150 i.e. Nait 5 won't do?
What a joke. Naim sheeps will go crazy with this statement from Naim.
!!! There's always money somewhere for the next upgrade... !!!
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by syd
Aren't a lot of us missing the point here. Almost any Amp will drive almost any speaker, but very low output amps and very low sensitivity speakers are not a good sounding match. All Naim are doing is ensuring that with a specific speaker in the range that you at least give it the best chance to give of its best at reasonable and at sometimes unreasonable sound levels. You may well be content with moderate sound levels most of the time but once in a while we all like to let our hair down and get mean and dirty. Naim are ensuring that if you do this then the amps have at least enough in reserve to avoid clipping and any subsequent damage. And I also thought that my 90/3 was well able to drive my old Linn Saras then I got a 250. Suddenly there was dynamics, resolution and tons of detail I'd been missing. All sorts of music started to make sense. Just because it's physically possible to do something does'nt mean it's musically gonna be right.
Yours in Music
Syd
Yours in Music
Syd
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by Minky
Hang on Syd,
Tuan has a point about us "Naim sheeps".
How about the following for a very tasty rig :
Radio : "Junior electronics kit" crystal radio set.
CD : "Barbie loves bacon" cookie oven and CD player.
TT : Scooby doo pooper scooper twin decks.
AMP : Hampsterwheel 3 (3 hampster model).
Speakers : NBL.
This will get you 97.352% to CDS3/552/500 level for .000000001% of the price. You would have to be criminally insane to do anything else !
[This message was edited by Minky on TUESDAY 03 June 2003 at 03:55.]
Tuan has a point about us "Naim sheeps".
How about the following for a very tasty rig :
Radio : "Junior electronics kit" crystal radio set.
CD : "Barbie loves bacon" cookie oven and CD player.
TT : Scooby doo pooper scooper twin decks.
AMP : Hampsterwheel 3 (3 hampster model).
Speakers : NBL.
This will get you 97.352% to CDS3/552/500 level for .000000001% of the price. You would have to be criminally insane to do anything else !
[This message was edited by Minky on TUESDAY 03 June 2003 at 03:55.]
Posted on: 02 June 2003 by JeremyB
quote:
I just returned from a live jazz trio last night and the sheer dynamic impact of the drum kit is so great that trying to achieve that on your hi fi seems like an exercise in futility.
Funny, I've been noticing lately (since getting a CDS2) how very close everything sounds to real instuments, especially a real drumkit, timpanii, piano etc.
Posted on: 03 June 2003 by Philip Pang
>> So, yeah, if it is purely music that you are truly interested in, then perhaps a well chosen modest kit is all you need.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Hi Hockman, been some time, glad to see you're still posting off and on. Trust your relationship with the 500/DBLs to be going exceptionally well.
We pays our dues for wanting a 552/500 over a Nait 5, cos it's human nature to want the grander (and finer) scheme of things in life.
I guess from the audition I had that late afternoon many years ago, I learnt one could be equally content with a Nait from a musical standpoint since it was cut from the same cloth as the 52/135s. A Nait still makes music make sense, emotionally, and this 5th iteration of Naim's only classic integrated really shifts the goal posts again, and by some margin. The thing is to be happy with either the Nait or reference amplifiers if that's your choice, and to get back to enjoying the music at the end of the day: they both represent tremendous "value" in the context of what they offer at the different price points relative to the rest of the competition.
Seth, glad you're lapping it all up. You know you will "graduate" towards a 552/500 one day, if you like the Nait 5 for what it does as Naim's "baby" amplifier. The promise/premise of getting something better in the near future makes our hobby tick. So get ready to rob the bank eventually. And I'll gladly join you.
But then again, there's always a reluctant capitalist lurking somewhere in our midst who might just so good-naturedly help us with the funding when the time comes. You never know...
Good listening all; the music's groovin' frightfully more.
Philip
naimniac for life
[This message was edited by Philip Pang on TUESDAY 03 June 2003 at 09:25.]
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Hi Hockman, been some time, glad to see you're still posting off and on. Trust your relationship with the 500/DBLs to be going exceptionally well.
I guess from the audition I had that late afternoon many years ago, I learnt one could be equally content with a Nait from a musical standpoint since it was cut from the same cloth as the 52/135s. A Nait still makes music make sense, emotionally, and this 5th iteration of Naim's only classic integrated really shifts the goal posts again, and by some margin. The thing is to be happy with either the Nait or reference amplifiers if that's your choice, and to get back to enjoying the music at the end of the day: they both represent tremendous "value" in the context of what they offer at the different price points relative to the rest of the competition.
Seth, glad you're lapping it all up. You know you will "graduate" towards a 552/500 one day, if you like the Nait 5 for what it does as Naim's "baby" amplifier. The promise/premise of getting something better in the near future makes our hobby tick. So get ready to rob the bank eventually. And I'll gladly join you.
Good listening all; the music's groovin' frightfully more.
Philip
naimniac for life
[This message was edited by Philip Pang on TUESDAY 03 June 2003 at 09:25.]
Posted on: 03 June 2003 by Martin Payne
"5th iteration of Naim's only classic integrated"
Philip,
there never was a NAIT 4 - I believe it's an unlucky number in the Far East?
cheers, Martin
E-mail:- MartinPayne at Dial.Pipex.com
Philip,
there never was a NAIT 4 - I believe it's an unlucky number in the Far East?
cheers, Martin
E-mail:- MartinPayne at Dial.Pipex.com