Freeview Boxes
Posted by: Laurie Saunders on 30 August 2006
Is the Sony D800 U still the best freeview box?
(it can be bought at a few places still)
I don`t need hard drives etc etc...just the best pic and sound quality
laurie
(it can be bought at a few places still)
I don`t need hard drives etc etc...just the best pic and sound quality
laurie
Posted on: 30 August 2006 by Ian Hughes
Seems to still be well respected on AVForum. Mine is substantially better than the unit it replaced. However it is not infallible. For some reason, motor scooters driven by the local hoodies seem to cause interference, albeit not as much as the previous cheapo Goodmans.
Posted on: 30 August 2006 by Laurie Saunders
Ian
thanks for the reply
I have been using the Nokia for the last few years. At the time I bought it it was reviewed as being as good as the Sony, though the Nokia seems to have disappeared off the map, whilst the Sony is still "current"
Perhaps you could help me: The Nokia has stereo RCA (aka phono) sockets for audio out....I use these to feed my Naim system with sound. It is of tolerable quality
Overall I am happy with the sound and picture from my Nokia though it does seem rather prone to "locking up"
I note that the Sony uses a stereo 3.5 mm jackplug for audio out. Do you use this to feed an amp? and if so do you have any tips? (eg is cable quality important etc) I currently use Chord Cobra 2 with my Nokia freeview box and it did seem to benefit the sound somewhat. If necessary I can assemble a lead (3.5 mm plug to 5 pin DIN)using decent cable (eg Chord Cobra 2)
I just wonder what your experience has been
PS The Nokia seems to "freeze" and "lock" quite easiliy...sometimes requiring me to power the unit down and then powering up again to "unlock" it. most annoying especially if I am taping
Thanks again in advance for all your help
laurie
thanks for the reply
I have been using the Nokia for the last few years. At the time I bought it it was reviewed as being as good as the Sony, though the Nokia seems to have disappeared off the map, whilst the Sony is still "current"
Perhaps you could help me: The Nokia has stereo RCA (aka phono) sockets for audio out....I use these to feed my Naim system with sound. It is of tolerable quality
Overall I am happy with the sound and picture from my Nokia though it does seem rather prone to "locking up"
I note that the Sony uses a stereo 3.5 mm jackplug for audio out. Do you use this to feed an amp? and if so do you have any tips? (eg is cable quality important etc) I currently use Chord Cobra 2 with my Nokia freeview box and it did seem to benefit the sound somewhat. If necessary I can assemble a lead (3.5 mm plug to 5 pin DIN)using decent cable (eg Chord Cobra 2)
I just wonder what your experience has been
PS The Nokia seems to "freeze" and "lock" quite easiliy...sometimes requiring me to power the unit down and then powering up again to "unlock" it. most annoying especially if I am taping
Thanks again in advance for all your help
laurie
Posted on: 30 August 2006 by Ian Hughes
Laurie,
Since, I've had it, the box has not locked up once - something I can't say about its predecessor.
I don't use the 3.5 jack but have a rapidly ageing Panasonic CRT television and take my audio feed from its fixed level audio output phonos. That enables me to play everything (Video/DVD/terrestrial analogue)through the hifi, and not just the digital channels.
BTW there are noises that the Sony may soon be (or may actually already have been) discontinued, so I wouldn't pontificate too much further.
Ian
Since, I've had it, the box has not locked up once - something I can't say about its predecessor.
I don't use the 3.5 jack but have a rapidly ageing Panasonic CRT television and take my audio feed from its fixed level audio output phonos. That enables me to play everything (Video/DVD/terrestrial analogue)through the hifi, and not just the digital channels.
BTW there are noises that the Sony may soon be (or may actually already have been) discontinued, so I wouldn't pontificate too much further.
Ian
Posted on: 31 August 2006 by graham55
Procrastinate?
G
G
Posted on: 31 August 2006 by Stephen H
quote:Originally posted by graham55:
Procrastinate?
He'll decide later!
Posted on: 31 August 2006 by Ian Hughes
Think too deeply before deciding
Posted on: 31 August 2006 by Allan Probin
If you don't require hard-drive recording, then the Netgem iPlayer is the other one to consider. It has a good quality component video output (as well as RGB) and an optical digital connection for the audio. The Netgem is the one I use.
Allan.
Allan.
Posted on: 31 August 2006 by BigH47
Laurie what model Nokia do you have?
Howard
Howard
Posted on: 06 September 2006 by Laurie Saunders
Howard
the 221T...the domed shaped one in grey
laurie
quote:Laurie what model Nokia do you have?
the 221T...the domed shaped one in grey
laurie
Posted on: 06 September 2006 by Laurie Saunders
I have purchased the Sony and been using it now for about a week
My feelings so far are:
1. The picture quality is probably a tad better than the Nokia..but not by much
2. The sound quality is possibly inferior to the Nokia...this could be down to "burn in " of the Chord Cobra cable I assembled with a 3.5 mm stereo jack
3. It hasn`t "frozen" or pixelllated yet...I know my Nokia was doing it all the time
4. The menu system of the Nokia is better imo though that could be simple familairity
5. Of most importance to me is the ability to expand the picture to fill my 3x4 29 inch CRT Sony TV. I would much rather lose the edges in a widescren picture than have black bars top and bottom and waste about 1/4 of the available screen area of my TV..and subject my poor eyesight to a smaller magnification picture
It seems that the Nokia is much better in this respect and this feature alone is -for me- worth sacrificing a mite of pic and sound quality for. The deciding factor here for me is the immunity to locking of the sony
So really to summarise the differences in sound and picture qulity are not worth worrying about here- imo the sony has the edge in picture and the nokia in sound......the tradeoff is locking vs screen filling
laurie
My feelings so far are:
1. The picture quality is probably a tad better than the Nokia..but not by much
2. The sound quality is possibly inferior to the Nokia...this could be down to "burn in " of the Chord Cobra cable I assembled with a 3.5 mm stereo jack
3. It hasn`t "frozen" or pixelllated yet...I know my Nokia was doing it all the time
4. The menu system of the Nokia is better imo though that could be simple familairity
5. Of most importance to me is the ability to expand the picture to fill my 3x4 29 inch CRT Sony TV. I would much rather lose the edges in a widescren picture than have black bars top and bottom and waste about 1/4 of the available screen area of my TV..and subject my poor eyesight to a smaller magnification picture
It seems that the Nokia is much better in this respect and this feature alone is -for me- worth sacrificing a mite of pic and sound quality for. The deciding factor here for me is the immunity to locking of the sony
So really to summarise the differences in sound and picture qulity are not worth worrying about here- imo the sony has the edge in picture and the nokia in sound......the tradeoff is locking vs screen filling
laurie