CD5, CDX2 and Options In Between
Posted by: Naimed-In-NY on 24 January 2004
Greetings. Just thought I'd post something regarding a fascinating and enjoyable demo session I did yesterday. I demo'ed: (a) CD5; (b) CD5 + Flatcap2; (c) CD5 + Hi-Cap2; and (d) CDX2. While the results of the demo may be predictable to many, it was highly informative to me. What did I buy? Nothing. Yet.
My system: 200/202/PSC2/Marantz cdp/VPI tt set-up/Stageline/Soliloquoy 5.3 speakers. My goal: Upgrade good mid-fi cdp to a Naim cdp. I've been saving my pennies and nickels for about six months, and decided it was time to do a serious audition of Naim cdps. I've saved up enough for a CD5, and possibly a Flatcap2. I was particularly interested in seeing how the CD5 + Hi-Cap2 would compare to the CDX2. Financially, the CDX2 is out of the question at the moment, and even with some more months of saving, I have reservations about spending that type of money on a single component. My hope was that I'd really like the CD5, be blown away by adding a Flatcap2 or Hi-Cap2, and decide that the CDX2 isn't really worth the extra money. This is what I heard ...
The bare CD5 is a heck of a player. I listened to it for quite a while. My dealer was kind enough to set-up my home system (200/202/PSC2), with B&W N804s as a substitute for my speakers. The sound was excellent; clearly better than what I have at home. The CD5 did a great job of keeping instruments separated and the music just flowed. Very impressive.
Then we added the Flatcap2. I actually was slightly disappointed with the result. The combo definitely is better than a bare CD5, with deeper, better bass being the most readily noticeable improvement. However, adding the Flatcap2 did not produce a night-and-day type improvement, at least in my opinion.
Then we substituted the Hi-Cap2 for the Flatcap2. Wow. The improvement was night-and-day to my ears. Everything sounded better. Bass was better, so was the separation of instruments; the soundstage expanded in width and depth. There were other differences that I lack the vocabulary to describe articulately. I thought the difference of moving from a Flatcap2 to the Hi-Cap2 was much bigger than adding a Flatcap2 to a bare CD5. I was loving the music. I also was getting psyched. I was going to buy the CD5, save up for awhile, and then buy the Hi-Cap2. I'd be in cd heaven. Life was looking good. I actually said to my dealer that although I wanted to hear the CDX2, I couldn't believe that any cdp could sound so appreciably better than what I was hearing from the CD5 + Hi-Cap2 to justify the additional outlay.
I was wrong. It took no more than 10 seconds of listening to the CDX2 to realize it was appreciably better. It was a whole different animal. Everything was better - timing, treble, bass, you name it. The band could have been in the room. I thought of myself listening to this music at home and never wanting to leave the room. This was not what I wanted to hear. How could I now buy the CD5, save up for the Hi-Cap2, and wind up spending pretty close to what a CDX2 would cost without actually winding up with a CDX2?
After discussing things with my dealer, I decided to wait, for now. I'm going to save some more money. I very easily could live with a CD5. Adding a Hi-Cap2 to a CD5 would give me an awesome combination, and this is ultimately what I might do if financial circumstances dictate it. But, barring more pressing financial commitments and the return of my sanity, I'm going to shoot for the CDX2. The one thing I know for sure: I'm never, ever, ever going to listen to a CDS3!
Before signing off, I have to give kudos to Bruce at Innovative Audio in NYC. He's been a great source of information and is very enjoyable to deal with. He provides the type of service for which Naim dealers (at least the better ones) are famous. We spent hours together yesterday and not once did he push me towards a purchase. Whether I'll get the CDX2 or be forced to settle, happily, for a CD5 and the possibility of future upgrades, I don't know, but I do know who I'll be dealing with when it is time to buy.
MBM
Posted on: 24 January 2004 by HTK
Thanks for that MBM. Very informative and from my perspective a bit depressing. I'm fighting the urge and you haven't made it any easier. But thanks all the same.
What do 2 year old CD5's fetch on eBay I wonder...
Posted on: 24 January 2004 by Boekster
Biggest problem with Naim is, as soon as you hear better you forget about the cheaper stuff

.
But I was struck with awe when I heard the difference as well. I never even realized the difference would be that huge. I thought €2000,- for a player was quite a lot of money. Currently saving up for a CDX2, which costs double.
My dealer has never ever let me listen in on the 500, although it was powered on, warm and ready for takeoff. He kept me safe I guess, as I can ill aford to save up 18 grand... The player took me quite a while! Currently I am aiming fairly high, as I want to end up with a CDX2/282/250/Hi for now. Power supply's might come in later, but I have no doubts it will eventually lead to a CDS3 etc.
But you are right though. Perhaps it is best to settle down for a CD5. It does have some charmes to keep upgrading over time!
Posted on: 24 January 2004 by Rasher
You get a CD5, then after a while add a Flatcap2, then save over a few years and buy a HiCap. You've then had a CD5 for say 5 years and have to sell it all to get a CDX2 to move on. If you get a CD5 + HiCap2 in one hit, where do you go from there but sell it?? If you spent your money on a CDX2 now, you have an option in the future to upgrade by adding a XPS2, thereby making your CDX2 a safe investment for the future. You buy a CD5+HiCap now, and its already the end of the road. Selling anything will inevitably lose you money in the long run. Hold out for the CDX2. You know (unfortunately) that you want it already!

Posted on: 24 January 2004 by Naimed-In-NY
quote:
Originally posted by Rasher:
You buy a CD5+HiCap now, and its already the end of the road. Selling anything will inevitably lose you money in the long run. Hold out for the CDX2. You know (unfortunately) that you want it already! 
You're right. I want it! I want it! What I'm struggling with is whether I really can put aside enough "discretionary" funds for a CDX2 and, if I can, should I be spending that type of money on a cdp. With all due respect to those who may have done this, I personally would not buy the CD5 + HiCap2 at once - if I could afford to do that now, then, after what I recently heard, it would be an easy decision to spend a little more and get the CDX2. Somehow, it just seems so much easier, and less extravagent, to buy a bare CD5, enjoy the hell out of it while slowly saving up, and then a year or so later adding a Hi-Cap2. However, at least for me, the CDX2 was way better than a CD5 + Hi-Cap2. Therefore, logic tells me that instead of making two smaller purchases, I'd be better off being patient, saving up longer, and making one slightly bigger purchase and getting what I now really lust after.
See how I'm trying to rationalize this already?
Honestly, I still may just chicken out and go for a bare CD5. It really is quite a player and would be a big upgrade from what I have now. My demo also proved to me that if I bought the CD5 and had upgrade ambitions later on, the Hi-Cap2 would be worth the extra money over the Flatcap2. The CD5 + Hi-Cap2 is a great combination. I could live very happily with it. But, boy, did that CDX2 sound incredible ....
MBM
Posted on: 24 January 2004 by TomK
"But, boy, did that CDX2 sound incredible ...."
Just wait till you hear it with the XPS2. Go on..you know you want to.

All the best whatever you decide to do.
Posted on: 24 January 2004 by av in bc
quote:
Selling anything will inevitably lose you money in the long run. Hold out for the CDX2.
The upgrade path is best, get what you can when you can and upgrade when you can. Calculate the hours of enjoyment divide by the loss of your original purchase. The more you enjoy the more you save.
Posted on: 24 January 2004 by Steve Toy
quote:
Just wait till you hear it with the XPS2. Go on..you know you want to.
Fortunately adding the XPS2 isn't night and day - you need a change of preamp up to a 282 first.
Regards,
Steve.
Posted on: 24 January 2004 by Naimed-In-NY
quote:
Just wait till you hear it with the XPS2. Go on..you know you want to.
Fortunately adding the XPS2 isn't night and day - you need a change of preamp up to a 282 first.
[/QUOTE]
Hold on, folks. An XPS2? A 282? Give a guy a break. I'm suffering from the pangs of indecision; the struggle between the heart and the wallet; and you guys have me adding a psu to a cdp I don't have the cash or guts to buy yet AND upgrading my beloved 202? Let's take things real slow now.
Staying on the fence for now ... MBM
Posted on: 24 January 2004 by HTK
Of course, wanting a CDX2 shouldn't detract from the fact that the CD5 is a very fine player for the money. Adding a S/H HiCap is a very cost effective step.All you'll ever need within that price range. The numbers begin to look similar at this point but it's still several hundred pounds difference. And if you're going to get that CDX2 one day, it's not like you're lumbered with junk in the mean time. Well, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Rasher
They are all correct of course, but we all do things differently. I would end up never being entirely satisfied because a CDX2 would be nagging, especially when I'd gotten a HiCap and spent about the same. The CDX2 would cost its purchase price + the loss on the sale of the CD5 + the loss on the sale of the HiCap. It's not like you don't eventually want a CDX2 - not that the 5 isn't good enough of course, but it's human nature ( I speak for myself anyway). Mr Toy has a point too, in that if the CDX2 isn't a night & day improvement (not sure myself), then the end maybe already in sight.
Me...I'd save more and wait. Your CDP is doing its stuff still? Live with it a little longer. If you want justification, add up the cost of each path. I'm holding out for a CDX2 too. Thought about a used CDX...but then thought....Nahh....get want you want.
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by HTK
What am I talking about?! I've just taken my socks off and counted again. My new CD5 and S/H Hi comes in at just over £1000 shy of a CDX2. Danm! I'll heve to try another argument with my piggy bank. MBM - would you say the extra 'wow!' of the CDX2 was worth all the extra bucks, now that you've had time to think about it? From memory I think it is IMO.
Cheers
Harry
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Rasher
There are used CDX2's out there too. I've seen AudioT do an ex-deno for £2100, so that is 20% off. Can't put the HiCap on the pre 'cos the funds are in the CDP cost.
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Mr_Sukebe
My own option, buy a CD5i, save £300 over a CD5 and then wait until I can replace it with a CDX2.
The CD5/hicap2 route seems all rather pointless bearing in mind that buying them new is only £300-400 less than a CDX2.
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Naimed-In-NY
quote:
Originally posted by Rasher:
They are all correct of course, but we all do things differently. I would end up never being entirely satisfied because a CDX2 would be nagging, especially when I'd gotten a HiCap and spent about the same. The CDX2 would cost its purchase price + the loss on the sale of the CD5 + the loss on the sale of the HiCap. It's not like you don't eventually want a CDX2 - not that the 5 isn't good enough of course, but it's human nature ( I speak for myself anyway). Mr Toy has a point too, in that if the CDX2 isn't a night & day improvement (not sure myself), then the end maybe already in sight.
Me...I'd save more and wait. Your CDP is doing its stuff still? Live with it a little longer. If you want justification, add up the cost of each path. I'm holding out for a CDX2 too. Thought about a used CDX...but then thought....Nahh....get want you want.
Rasher - I'm leaning same way as you. Realistically, there probably is something close to a 50/50 chance that I will chicken out, decide that I can't spend CDX2 type of money on a cd player, or have something come up that makes such a large purchase impractical. If that happens, I'll buy a CD5 and enjoy it immensely because it really is a heck of a player, and maybe one day down the line I'll be able to add a Hi-Cap2 and really take it to the next level.
However, if there is any chance that I'll have the cash and the balls to buy a CDX2, I'm going to try to hold out for it. For now, I'm saving my money.
MBM
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Naimed-In-NY
quote:
Originally posted by HTK:
What am I talking about?! I've just taken my socks off and counted again. My new CD5 and S/H Hi comes in at just over £1000 shy of a CDX2. Danm! I'll heve to try another argument with my piggy bank. MBM - would you say the extra 'wow!' of the CDX2 was worth all the extra bucks, now that you've had time to think about it? From memory I think it is IMO.
Cheers
Harry
The CD5 + Hi-Cap2 sounded awesome to my ears. It is a great combo that produces wonderful music. If I wind up there, I'll be a happy man. That being said, yes, the CDX2 is worth the extra money in my opinion. Believe me, I didn't want it to be. I really was hoping that the difference between a CD5 + Hi-Cap2 and a CDX2 would be negligible. That would have allowed me to scoff at the prospect of paying CDX2 money. I'd have ordered a CD5 on the spot with the knowledge that adding a Hi-Cap2 down the line would have been the finish line for me. Alas, I found the CDX2 to be appreciably better.
MBM
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Naimed-In-NY
quote:
Originally posted by Rasher:
There are used CDX2's out there too. I've seen AudioT do an ex-deno for £2100, so that is 20% off. Can't put the HiCap on the pre 'cos the funds are in the CDP cost.
I've put my dealer on alert to let me know if he can get his hands on a mint condition used or demo CDX2. For reasons alluded to in my opening post, I'm going to make my ultimate purchase from the dealer I've been working with.
MBM
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Phil Barry
N-i-NY,
Consider the cost of buying a CD5, then a Hicap2, and then selling them to by the CDX2.
Then compare the loss on the sale to the interest you'd pay if you put the CDX2 on plastic. The insane plastic interest rates may not be insane in this case....
I don't believe I'm writing this....
Less insane is to go the used CDX route - not as good as the X2, but alot better than the 5.
Regards.
Phil
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Emil
Im waitng for the CDX3So I can pick up a lightly used CDX2 for about half the price

I would go with the CD5 and a used hicap which would bring you to about $3000. Thats $2000 less than a CDX2 I believe.
Im sure there is something you can do with the two grand
you just saved

Posted on: 25 January 2004 by HTK
Half price? Bloody hell! Buy it. Buy two if you can.
Cheers
Harry
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Colin Ackerman
PR
Interesting point about the Chord DAC. I bought the linn Ikemi over the CDX2 which I felt was a better player IMO. Also the Ikemi is a very good transport with balanced outputs which could be matched with the Chord DAC. I have heard the combination is stunning.
Colin
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Pete Lewthwaite
MBM,
At the risk of upsetting your nice dealer, can I suggest one set-up that I cannot see you tried, CD5/202/HiCap2/PSC/200.
I have a CD5 with a 2nd hand HiCap, and while it is a significant improvement over the bare CD5 IMHO there is more benefit to gained by putting the HiCap on the pre-amp. This would also have the effect of improving the turntable sound.
Pete L.
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Colin Ackerman
Pete
I 2nd that

Colin
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Naimed-In-NY
quote:
Originally posted by Pete Lewthwaite:
MBM,
At the risk of upsetting your nice dealer, can I suggest one set-up that I cannot see you tried, CD5/202/HiCap2/PSC/200.
I have a CD5 with a 2nd hand HiCap, and while it is a significant improvement over the bare CD5 IMHO there is more benefit to gained by putting the HiCap on the pre-amp. This would also have the effect of improving the turntable sound.
Pete L.
Pete - Thanks for the message. In defense of my dealer, he actually inquired if I wanted to hear that combo and I said no. I previously heard what a Hi-Cap2 can do to a 200/202 combo and was very impressed. However, I decided to limit (rightly or wrongly) my recent audition to the four cd combos I listed. I wanted to focus on how much a Hi-Cap2 improved a CD5, and how the CD5 + Hi-Cap2 compared to a CDX2. (I also was somewhat limited on time, although I wound up spending hours in the shop.) I did discuss with my dealer the possibility of getting a CD5 and later a Hi-Cap2 and whether the Hi-Cap2 would be better on the CD5 or the 202. My dealer's take is that it really is a personal preference type of thing. A lot depends, of course, on the sources you use. If you listen to a lot of vinyl and/or radio, you might be better with the Hi-Cap2 on the 202; if you listen mostly to CD, my dealer seemed to think it would be better on the CD5 (although I don't want to hold him to that because we only spoke briefly about this issue and I'm not sure I recall everything he said on it). At this point, I don't need to decide where to put a Hi-Cap2. If I could manage getting the CD5 + Hi-Cap2 now, at once, I'd take the deeper plunge and just get the CDX2. If sanity returns and I opt for the CD5, the Hi-Cap2 would come down the road and then I could experiment at my leisure as to where it went best.
Although I was totally blown away by the CDX2, let me say again that the CD5 is a heck of a player and adding the Hi-Cap2 really made it special. For those forum members who are skeptical as to what the small, innocent-looking Hi-Cap can do a cdp or preamp, get thee down to a dealer.
MBM
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Naimed-In-NY
quote:
Originally posted by PR:
Naim-In-NY
You probably want your HIFI to match? In this case, the CDX2 might be the best buy.
Otherwise, dealers are starting to give weight to the new Chord CD Player/DAC as the best player money can buy. The DAC alone is within your future budget, and might sound stunning with your Marantz transport. Worth an audition if you can, and when further funds permit, you could buy the Chord transport.
PR, thanks for the message. I'm sure there are some worthy competitors to Naim. However, at present time I'm a one-company-guy. I'm hooked on the Naim sound and the components I've gotten so far (200/202/PSC2/Stageline) have given me so much enjoyment, that I'm listening to and enjoying music more than ever. I've owned components by other high end manufacturers and they have not satisfied me the way Naim does. As I write this, I realize it sounds close-minded, and one could argue that anybody contemplating spending this type of money on hi-fi should shop around to multiple brands, but, honestly, I have no desire to do so. For what I'm looking for in stereo, Naim does it for me, and I've decided to focus on building the best Naim system I can afford.
MBM
Posted on: 25 January 2004 by Stevea
quote:
Originally posted by Naimed-In-NY:
....... If sanity returns and I opt for the CD5, ....
MBM
Since when have sanity and expensive audio equipment had anything to do with each other?
For myself, later this year, I plan to be going straight to the CDX2 (from 1989 vintage Sansui) without any intermediate steps. This gives a clear path through adding an XPS2 and eventually selling the CDX2 and getting a CDS3 - sanity be dammed.
Steve