SL2s vs NBLs vs DBLs
Posted by: John on 29 December 2002
I am considering changing my SBLs to one of the above speakers. I have heard the NBLs with a 500, DBLs active with 135's but not in any comparative listening. The price differences aren't huge when you consider used DBLs or NBLs.
Based on reading some reviews there seems to be mixed opinions about the NBLs. The negative comments I read are similar to what I experienced when I listened to them. They can make some sound dry and hard. I also understand they are setup and room sensitive.
I liked the DBLs but will passive 135s do the job. I worry it might sound too relaxed. My impression of them compared to SBLs is they are more open, relaxed, expressive. The SBLs sounded more compressed.
My system is Naimed LP12/52/135's. What speaker would be best assuming I have to stay passive with my 135s for probably the next 5-10 years?
Help is appreciated.
John
Based on reading some reviews there seems to be mixed opinions about the NBLs. The negative comments I read are similar to what I experienced when I listened to them. They can make some sound dry and hard. I also understand they are setup and room sensitive.
I liked the DBLs but will passive 135s do the job. I worry it might sound too relaxed. My impression of them compared to SBLs is they are more open, relaxed, expressive. The SBLs sounded more compressed.
My system is Naimed LP12/52/135's. What speaker would be best assuming I have to stay passive with my 135s for probably the next 5-10 years?
Help is appreciated.
John