Chas.

Most "royal" (? royalty) correspondents are sublimely sickening - possibly an inevitable consequence of having to obsess about the trivial.

I woke up to a rather startling piece on Radio 4's Today, to the effect that on Chas's marriage Tom Parker Bowles (being older than Wills) would become next in line to the throne.

Then the Thought For The Day presenter came on and remarked on the date!

G

Nice to hear the advantages of adequate microphone-placement result in an individul's fair comment about 'journalists'.

quote:

Originally posted by Tony Lockhart:
Is the prince taking a leaf out of his dad's book? He has gone up in my estimations! And Witchell is horrible.

Tony

Why is Witchel horrible? I feel sorry for him, spending all his time following that dim, dithering twat. As for Charles's outburst, I deem him to have bitten that hand(s) that feed him.

EW

I thought it was very considerate of the BBC to put up subtitles just in case there was any doubt about what he had said.

I also thought it was quite amusing the way Anna Ford and Nicholas Witchell both appeared to have trouble in stifling their laughter.

I think the way the press have reported the story (as if there is even a story) proves what a bunch of twats the lot of them are.

Dave

well he is ginger.

quote:

Originally posted by garyi:
well he is ginger.

LOL! Good point!!

Poor sod, imagine 400 cameras pointed at you and someone says are you looking forward to your wedding. In an earlier age he would have put them all on the next jumbo to Iraq.