Mandatory upkeep tweak for Burndy users

Posted by: Ron Toolsie on 26 May 2003

As vigilant readers of this forum will know I have made some significant upgrades in the last few months.... one pair of the NAP135s in the sixpack was replaced with a NAP300 and the XPS1 gave way to the XPS2. The CDS3 is on order and hopefully should be delivered in the next couple weeks. The cumulative result was a much more unforced, relaxed and insightful presentation. The one fly in the ointment was that I could hear the LF very well, but could never quite feel it in my gut... something I could do in spades in my previous room and when I had the 552 here a few months ago.

Residents of the US know that this is a holiday weekend- Memorial day, which found me with sod-all to do except listen to music and watch paint dry (yes, I am having the outside of the house painted this weekend to the tune of almost 2xSupercaps worth Frown )

So today I decided to turn attention to the setuup of the system...the hardware I know can provide the visceral heft, and the room/Mana soundbases should only support that ability. Maybe, just maybe it was some set up anomaly.

I walked into the walk-in closet that houses the almost-too-many-to-count black boxes and surveyed it with a critical eye. The two rather flexible Burndies that go from the NAP300 to the NAP300PS made a delicate arc supported by one of the closet walls...walls that even after stuffing with cellulose insulation still resonate quite effectively causing the Burndies to sympathetically buzz along. So a quick exercise in topology later I had the Burndies in a free standing arc, not quite as aesthetic as the hyperbolic St. Louis monument, but still, no longer in physical contact with the wall.

Well, dammit if that doesnt sound sweeter yet, cleaner, breathier.... an improvement well worth the $0.00 cost and about 60 seconds of effort. BUT...there wasn't any more LF extension or tune than before. Encouraged by the Burndy dressing I ventured to look at the spider web of cable behind my rack and the back wall. Three Burndies (52, CDS2, Snaxo)in Gordian knots with interconnects, Snaic4s, Snaic5s etc etc. NOT a pretty sight.

Gently moving around the Burndies with all the equipment turned on and plugged in showed an alarming amount of rotational give where the Burndy entered the back of the 52. The remaining Burndies seemed rather more secure. So out it came and the two strain-relief screws (in this particular Burndy slot head screws, in other Burndies cross headed Phillips #2 types) turned about 1/2-2/3 turn. This resulted in a cable/plug interface that was far less rotationally yielding.

The Burndy was plugged into the back of the 52 and again gentle manipulated, confirming the strain relief was now strain relieving. Supercap turned on, and yours truly headed downstairs to open a can of Boddingtons best.

Twenty minutes later I dared to play the first track.

What I heard bore only a faint similarity to the sound I had become familiar to. Whiplash dynamics, a floating (yes floating) soundstage between the DBLs and glorious bass...deep, tuneful, visceral. Oddly enough the volume at 10-11 o'clock was now as loud as it had been at 12-1 o'clock before.

Dare I say this effected as large an improvment if not larger than the XPS1-XPS2,remembering that comparison was compromised by the disintegral Burndy. Now I would expect the differences between them to be much larger, and believe me they were already large enough for me to go and get one.

And to think I still have 5 other Burndy plugs to play with!

Ron
Dum spiro audio
Dum audio vivo
Posted on: 26 May 2003 by Ron Toolsie
the 300 Burndies

PS..there is little doubt that the loss of strain relief in my 52 Burndy was the direct result of the many times I have unplugged it and taken it over to audio buddies to try out, then come back and manhandle the dressing. These cables are semi-rigid and should be 'preformed' to allow interconnection without any unwanted torsion. When these were setup elsewhere, the preformed shaped was readjusted and not fully restored on their return. Which meant I had to subject them to some torsional twisting to get the pins and socket holes to align. There is only so many times this can be done without compromising the strain relief. Burndy users who have done it correctly the first time and then let things well enough alone should not be unduly paranoid about spontaneous dissolution of integrity. But those like me who actively engage in home-demoing your equipment elsewhere are very likely candidates to require Burndy readjustment.

Ron
Dum spiro audio
Dum audio vivo

[This message was edited by Ron Toolsie on TUESDAY 27 May 2003 at 01:28.]

[This message was edited by Ron Toolsie on TUESDAY 27 May 2003 at 01:28.]
Posted on: 26 May 2003 by dave simpson
Nice one Ron! I'll try your screw-tightening trick with my cds mk 1's black Burndy (I've also found similar improvements in the past by ensuring my cables hang in "free-air").

Question though...are your Burndies resting on top of the cases just for photographic purposes or plug-centering reasons..or...some other reason?

regards,

dave
Posted on: 26 May 2003 by Ron Toolsie
quote:

Question though...are your Burndies resting on top of the cases just for photographic purposes or plug-centering reasons..or...some other reason?

Actually.. they are hovering above the cases by several inches... the two dimensional picture seems to have them plastered ontop of the casing..but this is not the case. Hence I describe them as 'freestanding'.

And yes.. those ARE hockey pucks on the cases. They are visually less intrusive than paperback books or jewelcases and work even better. All for $0.99 each.

Ron
Dum spiro audio
Dum audio vivo
Posted on: 26 May 2003 by dave simpson
quote:

Actually.. they are hovering above the cases by several inches...

Ahhh....beats moving the rack(s) out from the wall ;-)

I used to use CK's hockey puck tweak with fantastic results back in my AF/BASE days. Time to try 'em with the fraims.....

regards,

dave
Posted on: 26 May 2003 by tre2fly
Ron, you have confirmed one of the points I have tried to convey on this forum, that using devices such as “Cable Elevators”, RightWay Audio “Suspenders” or “Polycrystal Cable Towers” to get power cords, speaker cables, and burndies, etc. off the floor, away from any surface, and unparallel together, provides obviously beneficial results! Wait’ll it is realized that placing vibration isolators such as Ganymede VCS’s under CDP’s and other components is startlingly more dramatic... Tom.
Posted on: 27 May 2003 by Richard Dane
Ron,

you have implemented a number of good tweaks here but I would caution against tightening up the Burndy connector too much. There should be a few degrees rotational movement in the cable when you gently twist the connector. Any stiffer than this and we feel that the sound suffers.

Obviously if the connector was really loose then tightening it up to this level will bring benefits.

One other tweak you may wish to try. When you've connected one end of the Burndy and then you're trying to line-up the unconnected end with a component you'll often find that the connector needs twisting - dont. Instead twist the actual cable so no strain is put on the connector. It should sound better.

Richard
Posted on: 27 May 2003 by Ron Toolsie
Richard,
Thanks for the official stance. I only tightened up the Burndy end that was freely (and I mean FREELY) rotating and surely had to be causing internal stress and unwanted torsion. This degree of play was sufficient to make me worry that internal damage was imminent had I not jumped in. While I expected a minor degree of improvement I was quite taken aback by the very significant leap this effected. I don't think I would be hyperbolic to suggest this was a Hi-to-Supercap difference...really it was. The fact that the volume at any given setting was very obviously louder than before makes me wonder if there was not some sort of internal shorting that already had occured, or possibly partial loosening/cracking of one of the solder joints to the pin. I do endorse the need to not make them 'Linn-tight'.
Right now things are sounding the best they ever have, and by quite some margin, so I am quite loath to pull further cables out and monkey with them. Your subsequent comments about twisting the cable instead of the connectors are loosely equivalent to the 'preforming' that I consider necessary for these uncompliant cables (to a point where they make the notoriously stiff NACA5 quite gossamer-like in comparison).

Ron
Dum spiro audio
Dum audio vivo


Posted on: 27 May 2003 by dave simpson
Your subsequent comments about twisting the cable instead of the connectors are loosely equivalent to the 'preforming' that I consider necessary for these uncompliant cables (to a point where they make the notoriously stiff NACA5 quite gossamer-like in comparison).

One evening when your really not in the mood for much of anything...kick back with favorite libation and do the manual-SNAIC-shake-thing for *at least* 10 minutes....might make a difference. (Dave Dever tip)

Btw...my Burndy connector screws were unfortunately ;-)...tight. I will make it a point to check them once a year though!

Thanks again Ron (and Richard),

dave