CD Purchase of the Year? (Or: Russell Sherman Plays Beethoven's Piano Concerti)
Posted by: Todd A on 09 April 2007
I got a hankering to hear both a new LvB piano concerto cycle and a bunch of new
Emperor recordings, so I started snooping, and what did I find? A new-ish release of a “younger” Russell Sherman playing the Big Five! Now, I’ve known about his newer live recording of the concertos with the mighty Monadnock Festival Orchestra under James Bolle on GM Recordings for a while, and I’ve entertained thoughts of buying it, but when I saw the Vanguard reissue of the early-80s Pro Arte recordings of the same works with Vaclav Neumann and the great Czech Philharmonic for a whopping $16, I decided to act. To say that I’m glad that I did is a major understatement: this is one of the finest Beethoven piano concerto cycles I’ve heard. In fact, I can’t really think of one that I prefer by a great margin. Not even the Schnabel and first Kempff cycles blow this one away. It’s quite simply a magnificent cycle.
First and foremost one must consider Sherman’s pianism. Yes, he’s heavy-handed and idiosyncratic to the point of outright eccentricity sometimes, and he plays with tempi all the time, but he makes it work. He breathes new life into the pieces, making the listener reconsider everything anew. His take on the cadenzas, for instance, involve all manner of tweaks, yet everything sounds almost as though invented on the spot. More important than that is the overall freshness he brings to the works. The C major concerto jumps right out of the speakers with a vitality and drive that many live recordings can’t match. And things are kept light and youthful, while still allowing for some more introspective playing. Ditto the Second. The Third is darker, stormier, and more intense, and boasts an extremely slow, lovely, and shaded slow movement that I think people will either love or hate. The fourth concerto is probably the comparative weak link in the set, but that just means it is merely wonderful. Lyrical where required, more energetic when appropriate, and perhaps just a little to showy, Sherman nonetheless delivers. And his
Emperor? Well, let’s just say it’s better than average. More detail will be forthcoming on this one later.
I mentioned Sherman’s proclivity to tempo tinker before, and sure enough he does. The overall timings of all five concertos are a bit on the long side, but the music making never sounds slow or labored or contrived. It all flows along wonderfully from start to finish. How he (and the conductor and band) manages it is something I cannot adequately explain.
And speaking of the conductor and band: both acquit themselves quite nicely, thank you very much. Neumann shows that he’s no journeyman only conductor; he knows and understands the music, and he sympathetically supports the soloist. The Czech Philharmonic sound and play splendidly, with wonderful strings, and some distinctive and compelling wind playing, as one generally expects from this band from the time. In short, Sherman gets superb backing from artists of a very high caliber indeed.
To sound, well, let’s just say that it doesn’t sound like 1984. The sound isn’t glassy or hard; it’s detailed, reasonably warm, and let’s everything shine through. It’s a bit bass light at times, giving the left channel a slight apparent boost. There’s some spotlighting, though I’ve heard more exaggerated spotlighting.
So, a truly individual take on these warhorses from high caliber artists in excellent sound at a bargain basement price. What’s not to like? If you really need more enticement, the set also includes Sherman playing the Op 119 Bagatelles, and they are predictably superb. Though I’ve switched my listening focus to new music, it’s sets like this one that remind me that even the most recorded music can sound fresh and alive if played right. Of course, Sherman’s very interventionist approach will not appeal to everyone, so those who like nothing but straight-man artistry ought not to buy this, but more adventurous souls may want to consider it.
Now what can best this during the year? Not even Sinae Lee’s superb Szymanowski cycle or Michel Block’s recording of Schumann’s
Novelleten do, though they more or less match it. Ah well, if I get one or two more discs or sets at this level, I’ll be happy indeed.
--
Posted on: 10 April 2007 by Earwicker
CD Acquisition of the Year thus far must go to the Vegh Quartet's early 70s Beethoven cycle.
I've got three complete recordings on my shelves and many partial ones, but, since I fell in love with this music 15 years ago at high school, I've NEVER found a recording of them that seems to get anywhere near the heart of the matter; well, the search is over. The Vegh's are so far ahead of anything else I've heard I think it'll be a long time before they're matched, if they ever are. The level of inspiration is very high, they are attentive to all the parts - the parts within the parts - it's amazing just how much music other groups miss! Hearing the Veghs was extremely illuminating and I'm very familiar with the pieces. They listen to the inner voices, have infinite dynamic gradations, VERY tasteful and judicious vibrato, very sage ears... this is the real thing, they don't just keep it tight and "bring out the tune". I could go on. Technical imperfections don't worry me here, although I'm rather more bothered about the closeness of the cello than the occasional lapses in intonation.
Beethoven speaks through the Veghs, enough said.
EW
Posted on: 10 April 2007 by Todd A
Yes, the Vegh set is special indeed, and as an achievement outdoes the Sherman PC set. The only competitor to the Vegh in the string quartets is the Budapest Quartet, in their mono cycle from United Archives. A different take, but as compelling in every way.
--
Posted on: 10 April 2007 by Earwicker
Hi Todd,
Yes, I'm back in acquisition mode for the Beethoven Quartets, now that I've found that it CAN be done; the (old) Budapests you mention are on the list, together with the Talich. Have you heard the Veghs' 1950s set? General consensus seems to be not as profound as the re-make but still worth a listen?
Digressing, but on the subject of CD Acquisitions of the year, I finally went for it and acquired the Toscanini Brahms set on Testament from the 1952 London concerts with the Philharmonia. Quite extraordinary in every respect, and points up what's wrong with a lot of today's rather blurred and nondescript approaches. Life-changing performances captured in quite incredible sound. Heartily recommended to anyone even remotely interested, it's the kind of recording that ... well, makes recordings worth making, worth having, and worth listening to. Incredible music making done on a way that no longer seems possible.
EW
Posted on: 11 April 2007 by Earwicker
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Arola:
The only competitor to the Vegh in the string quartets is the Budapest Quartet, in their mono cycle from United Archives. A different take, but as compelling in every way.
This can be had for very little money at the moment, I'm about to place an order... I'm torn between the Budapest and the Talich... suppose I could afford both but a bit extravagant! (I just happened upon your (well, presume it's yours!) review of the Budapests in Stereophile... you should do it professionally, you've certainly made me want it!)
Anyway, I'll keep you posted.
EW
Posted on: 11 April 2007 by Tam
For what it's worth, while I bought it at the tail end of last year, the Budapest's Beethoven is still what I'd want as my disc of the year - it's certainly the most impressive set I have bought recently. Some truly wonderful, beautiful and moving playing. I don't imagine anyone being disappointed with it. No apology need be made for the fine mono sound either.
regards, Tam
Posted on: 11 April 2007 by Todd A
quote:
Originally posted by Earwicker:
Have you heard the Veghs' 1950s set? General consensus seems to be not as profound as the re-make but still worth a listen?EW
No, I haven't heard it yet. The set is often available cheap (around $20 at Overstock), and I must say the Vegh's 50s Bartok is almost as good as their 70s Bartok, so it may be worth the money. The Talich is also superb and can often be had for little money.
I agree that Toscanini's Brahms on Testament is superb. Not all modern sets are bad, or all bad. Celi's 80s Brahms 2 is simply amazing, even given its long timing, and Barenboim's Brahms cycle has its moments, too. But give me Toscanini, Furtwangler, or Walter here . . .
--
Posted on: 11 April 2007 by Earwicker
Thanks chaps, you've talked me into it. I've just placed an order for the United Archives Budapest set - £19.49 off the Amazon Market place, I make that £2.44 per CD so that's not bad!
I think most of the murmurings I've heard about this quartet's Beethoven actually refer to earlier recordings, but the present set seems only recently to have become available; I haven't got a single Budapest Quartet recording in my otherwise quite large string quartet collection, so I'll be most interested. Experience has shown one can never have too many recordings of the Beethoven Quartets!
On which subject, I do wish someone would finally get round to putting a decent Busch set out there. They're all either crap transfers and/or incomplete and/or stupidly expensive. Perhaps a project for Naxos Historical?
Anyway, looking forward to hearing the Budapests...
EW
Posted on: 12 April 2007 by u5227470736789439
Dear EW,
On the Busch Quartet recordings, they recorded half a dozen or so in the thirties for HMV and perhaps three more for US Columbia after 1940. The EMI set was out for years in good "master transfers" on the Reference Series, and the CBS/Sony organisation has occasionally had the American Columbia recordings out as well. I have the EMI set and I have the First Razumowsky opus 59 no 1, and the opus 130 Quartet from Columbia. These are great readings in my view.
If you ever catch the Columbia issues don't hesitate as they are very rare. The EMI set ought to be findable, second hand or on Amazon. I quite agree that a survey of the existing recordings from Naxos would be very nice to have. They seem to be so good at transfering 78s...
ATB from Fredrik
PS: I also have records from the Rose Quartet [Arnold Rose was the leader of the VPO till 1938] on two Biddulf CDs, which are splendid [three quartets and Bach Double Violin Concerto all from 1927], and also the stereo Vegh series - also splendid - but my favourites are those few done with the Busch Quartet. If I could afford it I would go for the Budapest set as well.
PPS: Busch also made a recording with the Chamber Strings of the Grosse Fugue in the US, which would mean that all the late Quartets can be had in his readings. Apparently Toscanini was so amazed by Busch that he attended the recording session!
Posted on: 12 April 2007 by Earwicker
Hi Fredrik,
Busch...
Yeah, there's an EMI 4 CD set available with some other goodies by Schubert and Mendelssohn, but for some reason it doesn't contain Op 130... the Pearl set of the Late Quartets has strange added "reverb" (I've heard this set MP3ed, but don't tell anyone!) and it's expensive for what it is; it's odd-sounding after the EMIs (of which there's a copy in my local library, so badly scratched it skips all over the place!) and what I presume are first installments on Biddulph, Dutton and Something Else (Pavilion?). There's a gap in the market for a good set of transfers, after the fashion and price of the Budapest set I've just ordered. I'd like to add a good set - at least of the late quartets - to my collection, but I'd like a decent transfer and of course there's a limit to what I'm willing to pay for 1930s recordings on which the copyright has expired...
And for my other two wishes...!

Anyway, there's a chance the Budapest set will arrive tomorrow, and I'm absolutely head-over-heals with the Veghs!! For the present moment at least, I have a reason to live!!!
EW
Posted on: 12 April 2007 by u5227470736789439
Dear EW,
EMI never achieved a recording of the opus 130 with the Busch Quartet, before they left England at the outset of hostilities. That is why it was done for US Columbia. It is a fantastic performance.
It is all but unobtainable in UK, though I have twice seen it in London over the years. I have it. Send me an email. Address in profile. I also have the 4 CD EMI set, with Schubert and Mendelsohnn the splendid make-weights!
ATB f5rom Fredrik
Posted on: 12 April 2007 by Todd A
quote:
Originally posted by Earwicker:
I think most of the murmurings I've heard about this quartet's Beethoven actually refer to earlier recordings
The earlier Budapest recordings
are better, but there's no earlier complete cycle. The 50s mono set is nearly as good - which is to say, it's sublime. If ever Sony BMG reissues the 1940s recordings again, then anyone interested in this music shoudl snap them up. The two Bridge sets devoted to the middle and late quartets are also worth hearing. Incidentally, United Archives also released the Haydn Op 76 by the Budapest, and those, too, are superb.
--
Posted on: 12 April 2007 by Earwicker
Well I'm certainly looking forward to hearing them. I'm selling off some surplus CDs on ebay, so depending on how that goes I might add the Talich too ...! The Budapest set might arrive today if the vendor is prompt.
Fredrik - just sent a quick email. Hotmail is pretty adept at "filtering" messages from new addresses so if you don't receive it I'm museyroom at yahoo dot co dot uk
Best wishes,
EW
Posted on: 13 April 2007 by Earwicker
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Arola:
Incidentally, United Archives also released the Haydn Op 76 by the Budapest, and those, too, are superb.--
Yes, I know, I've got my beady (read "greedy and covetous"!) eye on that too...!
Budapest set arrived this morning and I am very eager to listen!!
Fredrik - you have email.
EW
Posted on: 13 April 2007 by Earwicker
Post Script - Mr Postie also brought me Gidon Kremer's new EGM recording of the Bach Sonatas and Partitas - I've just had a quick listen and I think I shall have more to say about THIS...!!!
Posted on: 20 April 2007 by Van_The_Man
Purchased the Sherman set via Amazon marketplace for £8.21 (inc. p&p)!
Wonderfull, the Op.37 is worth the admission fee on its own. Thanks Todd for putting me on to this.