Streaming with Windows Media Player??

Posted by: Consciousmess on 07 May 2012

Hi all,

I have read several posts and consulted the manual for the NDX regarding UPnP streaming.  What I gave gathered is that Windows Media Player Version 11 upwards can stream to the NDX (and of course the NDS and the ND5xs).....

So why have people gone for other programmes if they are PC folk?

Will I be able to use nStream and control all my albums which are organised with Windows Media Player??

Plus where does the Ethernet cable from the NDX be connected to: the PC directly or with the router??

Many thanks,

Jon
Posted on: 07 May 2012 by garyi

Windows media player is like a crapier version of itunes.

 

Connect the ethernet to your home router.

Posted on: 07 May 2012 by Consciousmess
Ok, thanks for that Gary, but how can Windows Media Player be crapper than iTunes??!! Surely the sound quality is identical??? Jon
Posted on: 07 May 2012 by Maxi Me

Nothing to do with sound quality, it's a usability thing.

 

Posted on: 07 May 2012 by Maxi Me
Originally Posted by Consciousmess:
So why have people gone for other programmes if they are PC folk?

There are other considerations too. In my experience it has been to do with the import side of things,rather than UPnP hosting afterwards.

 

The key point for making the ripped music collection easy to navigate later is getting the metadata correct (which will vary depending on how an individual thinks about finding their music).

Posted on: 07 May 2012 by pcstockton

I haven't used Windows Media Player in over a decade but I think it is safe to say that it is still of the lowest common denominator for media player out there.

 

That said, it probably is #2 in popularity behind iTunes.  That doesn't say anything to me other than, "this will suck".  Just like a burger from McDonalds or a episode of Dancing with the Stars.

 

I think you still need to download codecs for things like ALAC or FLAC.  No native support.  Can it be a UPNP server?  Can it be more than one server (nice for streaming off network)?  Does it do things like library syncing and sharing on a robust level?

 

I would either drop $50 on J River or use the free Foobar Player (for experienced PC users only).

 

-Patrick

Posted on: 07 May 2012 by pcstockton

...oh and that only addresses audio.  It is nice to be able to browse, play and SERVE pictures, data, and video.

 

J River does all of this very nicely.

Posted on: 08 May 2012 by Bonner

It really depends on how your ripped CDs are encoded - if you want to use FLAC then Windows Media Player will not stream those - it will stream WAV files. You could try an alternative server software such as  Asset or Twonky.  I prefer Asset for its better database capabilities but this is a persoan choice.  Asset will need a PC or server running Windows to work whereas Twonky is often installed on NAS drives in  cut down form.

Posted on: 08 May 2012 by McGhie
If you're streaming (UPnP) then there's also the question of whether to stream from your PC or from a NAS/server. Streaming from your PC relies on your PC being on when you want to listen to music. If I was streaming from my PC then I'd use Asset UPnP, which is excellent, rather than WMP, which sucks (limited support for lossless formats, limited configurability of UPnP server, and it once replaced all my album art). WMP is, of course, a better UPnP server than iTunes. Oh, and whether or not you're using Asset (and whether or not you're streaming from your PC), I'd use dBpoweramp for ripping (same software developer). Many go down the NAS/server route, keeping their music files and UPnP server on a separate, always on, box. I'm using a server (HP ProLiant MicroServer) running Windows Home Server 2011 and the corresponding version of Asset. This provides me with (IMHO) the best UPnP server out there, on a platform that also forms the centre of my backup strategy (automatically: backing my PC and laptop up to the server, keeping itself backed up, and backing the data on the server up to the cloud - the latter using CrashPlan). A NAS will be simpler to get up and running but will be a bit more limited (for a start, you might be stuck with the NAS's own rubbish UPnP server). Cheers Ian