Who Is Stephen Thomas Erlewine and Why?

Posted by: Jon Myles on 30 June 2012

Well, the title speaks for itself.

Almost every album detail in the new N-Stream brings up the man with his views on the recording.

Well, that's fair enough. But does seem a bit restrictive.

I appreciate the man's efforts - but they are only his views.

Apparently: "Heavy lies the crown on Bruce Springsteen's head"

New Order fans "couldn't help have been dissapointed" by Brotherhood.

And RX brings up a review for someone called LMFAO and Sorry For Party Rocking. Which isn't the track playing at all. And it then gives me the Album Name, Artist Name, Release Date, Label and Length.

All of which are totally wrong.

Not really a great leap forward here.

More just wrong.

And the review of Killing Moon: The Best of Echo & The Bunnymen is, well, it isn't really.

I could go on. But you'll get the picture.

Nice feature....but dumb.

Posted on: 30 June 2012 by garyi

Its like the radio, the public should never be involved.

Posted on: 30 June 2012 by Jon Myles
Originally Posted by garyi:

Its like the radio, the public should never be involved.

Hate to think Naim have actually paid for this service. But I have a horrible feeling they have.

In which case they actually think current Naim users and music-lovers are very dumb - or they think the new generation of buyers will be.

Actually. the more I think about it and see the reviews posted it is so, so wrong.

What happens in 10 years? Will the reviews be rewritten to reflect how a certain album is viewed then? Or will the reviewer be dead or retired so it's not possible? Or recruit a new reviewer to give his/her views?

Perhaps I'm getting to hung up on this. But I do think it is so really short-term.

I'd love Paul Stephenson to give us all a rationale for this move.

Posted on: 30 June 2012 by Jon Myles

And to just to add.....

Bruce Springsteen and The E Street Band at the Apollo Theatre is, apparently: "An astonishing record of James and the Flames tearing the roof off the sucker at the mecca of R&B theatres, New York's Apollo. When King Records owner Syd Nathan refused to fund the recording, thinking it commercial folly, Brown single-mindedly proceeded anyway, paying for it out of his own pocket....."

It goes on and on. And I'm sure it is all true. But it bears no relation to the download I'm listening to.

Bit like buying a record with the right sleeve and wrong record. Or vice-versa. Or whatever.

Hope Naim didn't pay too much for this.

Unless the people who sold it to them have fled. In which case, all credit to you!

Posted on: 30 June 2012 by Guido Fawkes
Jon please tell me this not true, as it would surely be the most worthless feature in the history of playing music. No way to update a streamer properly and yet time wasted on music reviews. Needless to say that only thing I want to do with such rubbish is delete it, as it would be equivalent of spam e-mail. No, it's a joke isn't nobody would include such a stupid feature. What next adverts? Please say you 're joking.
Posted on: 30 June 2012 by DrMark

He writes for allmusic.com...took me a while to remember where I'd seen his name.

Posted on: 30 June 2012 by thebigfredc

Interesting, sharply-observed post Jon.

 

I have only read a review on the info button once, a Smiths the best of, and thought STE got it spot on in terms of the album and the history of the band.

 

Will give his reviews a further glegg whilst listening today and report back.

 

Ray

Posted on: 01 July 2012 by BigH47
Originally Posted by Guido Fawkes:
Jon please tell me this not true, as it would surely be the most worthless feature in the history of playing music. No way to update a streamer properly and yet time wasted on music reviews. Needless to say that only thing I want to do with such rubbish is delete it, as it would be equivalent of spam e-mail. No, it's a joke isn't nobody would include such a stupid feature. What next adverts? Please say you 're joking.

It's probably got a "Like " button and FB access too.

Posted on: 01 July 2012 by Guido Fawkes

Well perhaps my reaction is over the top, but music reviews are simply something I might look at once, but never again .... what info do I value about a song .... title and artist and album title ... yes: I like to know who wrote it, who played on it and who produced/engineered it ... the lyrics would be nice. You know the things I got from the old fashioned record sleeve. The history of band can be interesting, but not essential and is perhaps the domain of Record Collector. 

 

Reviews may be useful if I've never heard the music, but if I have already bought it than strangely I still feel capable of making up my own mind whether I like it or not. Is this not the case for everybody else? I find views of folk hereon more useful (Gary Shaw has provided lots of useful recommendations). 

 

What does a Like button do? I've seen it on the forum.

So is somebody interested whether I like their post or not? 

 

Perhaps Naim is addressing the needs of market place that I'm no longer in. I just want the essentials: products that are easy to use and just work in tandem with Naim build, SQ and supportPerhaps I'm the one who is past my sell by date. 

Posted on: 01 July 2012 by Jon Myles
I may have been a bit over-the-top mouthy in my post. It had been a tough day. But it is all true. And I've got to say a feature like this just by its very nature going to be a hostage to fortune. It might sound good as an idea......but reality is a different matter.
Posted on: 01 July 2012 by thebigfredc

Just a picture of the album cover and the title of the track currently playing was previously one of the weak points of streaming.

 

Naim has now addressed this with the info button which makes a lot of material available, maybe too much in some instances. Overall though, it gets a thumbs up from me.

 

Ray

Posted on: 02 July 2012 by Jon Myles
Originally Posted by thebigfredc:

Just a picture of the album cover and the title of the track currently playing was previously one of the weak points of streaming.

 

Naim has now addressed this with the info button which makes a lot of material available, maybe too much in some instances. Overall though, it gets a thumbs up from me.

 

Ray

Ray,

I can see the benefits.

But I really have to take issue with comments such as "Happy Mondays.....were thugs, purely and simply. Under the leadership of Shaun Ryder the group sounded and acted like thugs....

"They didn't sample, but they borrowed melodies and lyrics and in the process committed rock blasphemy." 

It's a fine line between information and pure opinion. This is pure opinion tied into a Naim application. That's where I think this has been a mistake.

And, moreover, I'd think one or two members of Happy Mondays could actually find it actionable no matter what you think of their music. In which case Naim - as the publisher in this case - could find themselves liable.

And the defence of fair comment would not even apply as it's not the music being commented on but the character of the members of the band.

Posted on: 02 July 2012 by thebigfredc

Hi Jon

 

I too find myself disagreeing with STE sometimes. I often find that its just one or two sentences in his reviews that jar with my world-view. The other reviewers i have encountered so far seem more neutral and have had me nodding in agreement. I have also discovered lots of things about artists which I either have forgotten or never knew so the info button remains a positive experience for me.

 

Regarding the legal side of things, I couldn't give a shiny shite.

 

Ray

Posted on: 02 July 2012 by Jon Myles
Ray Good points. Apart from one. I'm bowing out of this debate now. Jon
Posted on: 02 July 2012 by Trevor Wilson

hello all,

 

i felt a response is in order to this post.

 

Naim intergrated the extended metadata feature on the n-Stream app and we provide the data that is already available to the public via the Rovi website (allmusic.com). The data displayed is based on the album/artist details we pass to them. Any data shown on the n-stream app is provided "as is" from Rovi directly without any Naim editorial control to the content.

 

As to the content of the album reviews themselves these are the opinions of the reviewer in question (as provided by Rovi) and do not reflect the opinion of Naim in any way.

 

cheers

Trev

Posted on: 02 July 2012 by Paul Stephenson
Hi Our intention was to try to find more added value music info for the music lover. In much of my testing it came it came up with accurate info and the reviews like all reviews must be taken in the round, i have very different views on some of the comments on some music but thats the nature of subjective comments. I am truly sorry if this has offended anyone and we will dig deeper.
Posted on: 03 July 2012 by CSI_Basel

Appreciate your comments Paul!!

Posted on: 09 July 2012 by Jon Myles
I appreciate the replies from Paul et al. Sorry I haven't got round to posting this earlier. They make sense. I'd still ask the question as to whether a clear delineation is needed though between what is and what is not Naim-agreed content. Or perhaps not. (No opinion myself.)