Pissed Off Big Time ?

Posted by: Gale 401 on 07 July 2012

I have lived in my home for almost thirty years.

I got a letter from my local council saying they have had a complaint about the loud music.

Its a first.

I did get the police round once when the Queen tribute concert was live on tv and had a friends birthday party on the same night many years ago..

I don't play that loud most of the time and never late at night.

In all these years i have never had one of these.

My son and daughter playing drums and other things that make  loud sounds all day long growing up, and Guitar's through Marshall amps.

Other friends round jamming for hours with volumes turned up to the max.

You could hear it half a mile away.

They left home years ago.

Never had a problem.

Bob the man that used to live next door for 28 years got to 90 and moved in with his daughter.

Two well past middle age blokes bought his place.

Well thats what i thought?

 

 

Moved in two months ago.

And now i get this shite,

Not happy.

Stu.

Posted on: 07 July 2012 by maze
I do think some councils have double standards over these issues, I live opposite a pub that has loud music, and I mean loud music playing late at night. I have complained for the last two years with little luck. It goes away for a while only to return with a vengeance. I have no problem with music playing at reasonable volume at reasonable times of day. At least I don't annoy neighbours and the neighbours don't annoy us as we all have detached houses here but the pub is a real issue for us and the landord gets away with it, most of the time it's an empty pub but with the music still playing to a empty room!
Posted on: 07 July 2012 by Mike-B

U have my sympathy Stu,   been there etc..

 

You could ask the council if they have guidelines for noise levels (dB) & in what circumstances & time of day. (dB is a number & cannot be argued against,  its normally measured at your or the complainants boundary)

If yes,  then ask them to come around & measure your normal output & check if it exceeds the level.

- say that you are very concerned & keen to understand how to address the issue.  

If they don't have guidelines you are in an argument over what constitutes a noise nuisance, but I would still ask them to come round & measure & advise & also discuss together with the complainants; then if they don't I would say its OK to carry on as normal.

Posted on: 07 July 2012 by Quad 33

Hi Stu I agree with Mike-B regarding council noise level guidelines .You do need to establish from the council when this complaint was made and at what time of the day it relates to, Is it the first such complaint? Have your neighbours spoke to you regarding this issue at any point recently if not maybe its worth talking to them to try and solve there perceived problem anacably before inviting the council round for a listening session. Other wise you need to establish what the council consider loud music? However this could be difficult without it being measured and they give you a maximum permitted level. Not sure what else you can do at this stage. Anyway good luck and I hope it does not spoil your listening pleasure to much.

 

Regards Graham.

Posted on: 07 July 2012 by TomK

I agree it must be annoying and suggest you talk to the council. Get some numbers behind it and perhaps talk to your new neighbours?

Posted on: 07 July 2012 by Gale 401
Originally Posted by TomK:

I agree it must be annoying and suggest you talk to the council. Get some numbers behind it and perhaps talk to your new neighbours?

Tom,

Talking would be good.

But they think all the slugs pop over from my garden to eat there potted plants.

They are chucking blue slug pellets over the fence.

They are going to get every slug in Kent now,

I have bought 15 cans of Fosters to tip on there garden in the middle of the night,Two cans a night.

They want slugs they will get them

I have to be a bit PC here.

I am well pissed off as are a few others where i live..

They are going to love it when i have a live band playing on the 23rd as i have done for years .

And everyone round here comes except them.

 

 

Stu.

Posted on: 07 July 2012 by TomK

Invite them? And can I come?

Posted on: 07 July 2012 by Gale 401
Originally Posted by TomK:

Invite them? And can I come?

Tom,

You will be most welcome.

Bit of a travel from Scotland though.

I am 10 mins drive from the chan tunnel.

Stu.

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by osprey
I feel for you, Stu. It must be difficult to suddenly have this kind of next door neighbors after having nice ones for so many years. As the others have already said get the sound levels measured and documented and go forward with that. Furthermore it should be allowed to play music loud every now and then during decent hours. I live in a flat in a house with very poor sound isolation but when the boys upstairs play Clash I put on Ramones. I usually go to bed around 10 and by 11 there is a silence in the house and in my mind that is how it should be. If your neighbors want a complete silence at every hours they should have bought a house from a remote countryside location. I hope you can get the situation sorted (concerning both music and garden) soon.
Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Fred Mulder

Stu,

 

Official rules are good to know, but don't dig trenches. Where possible, work on the relationship

No reason to become best friends, but a good relationship increases tolarance beyond rules.

 

Good luck with this, Fred

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Mike Hughes
Surely the argument is not about what the neighbours want but the other way round? If you want to play music at your volume whenever you want then why be where you are ? I am of course being sarcastic but I seek to add perspective. Has it occurred to anyone that this is all about choice? Maybe the previous neighbours couldn't afford to go elsewhere or needed to be there for specific reasons and therefore felt they couldn't complain? Maybe they even felt bullied? Perish the thought eh! Life is all about learning to live with other people and the fact is Stu now has to do that or move. I get the point about council hypocrisy but equally you'll also find that councils rarely send these letters for the sake of it and they won't even start this process if there's no prospect of a positive outcome.especially in the current financial outcome. Neighbour disputes are extremely unpleasant but they are also seldom one sided. Perish the thought that the amount of abuse about to be heaped on me for these observations might cast some light on exactly the sort of neighbour we Naimees might be!!!
Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Donuk

Perhaps they are Linn owners, and used to a better sound........

 

Seriously though Stu - if the friendly approach fails, counterattack.

 

Write to the Council and say that you cannot cope with the sound of their incessant love-making.

 

Don, overcast downtown York.

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Mike-B
Originally Posted by Gale 401:
But they think all the slugs pop over from my garden to eat there potted plants.

I am well pissed off as are a few others where i live..

They are going to love it when i have a live band playing on the 23rd as i have done for years.

 

Stu sounds (sorry not a pun) similar .........

I live in a smallish village that attracts a few people seeking a "country life" between the daily commute. Our parish (council) mag published a tongue-in-cheek piece about the real (justified) noise & other issues plus some amusing others mostly all related to newbee's ..........  

- Bell practice noise from a house that overlooks the bone yard

- House near the pub about Aunt Sally (Oxfurdshy'r outdoor summer pub game)

- Road closure & diversions (2 hrs on Bank Hol morning) for the May Day parade

- Ditto for August BH for the annual street ceilidh, pram race & Morris pissup sorry competition 

We have yet to get complaints about noisy sheep & crowing cockerels or horse pooh on the road,  but I am sure it will come some day. 

 

The message was the council take all noise complaints seriously as they are keen to have a peaceful village etc..  But the bottom line was the above listed tend to die away as people get used to our ways.

 

Lurve the slugs,  if you need some more, send me a large SAE. Mine are all pedigree high end diners that will only eat top quality plants. 

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Komet

I used to leave my old (noisy) diesel Land-Rover on the street. One morning I found a note asking if I could park it somewhere else. Went and approached likely suspects and asked if it was a problem. All denied it was and never had trouble after that. Why not do the same with your immediate neighbours, then if the council follow it up you can tell them it has been sorted? It's always better to try and resolve things first rather than resort to officialdom, maybe they work nights and just want to sleep in? 

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Mike Hughes
Anyone who posts a semi amusing response encouraging an antagonistic approach has clearly never had a real neighbour dispute. If you had, you just wouldn't. Generally speaking if the person being complained of won't have a conversation with the complainant it shows a certain amount of passive aggression and that will always exacerbate problems like this as will antagonistic responses. A little conversation goes a long way.
Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Guido Fawkes

 

 

 

 

I use to have neighbours I didn't get on, but fortunately they moved some years ago and everything is much better now ..... it is a shame you can't invite them around for some of Ogden's Nut Gone Flake and have a bit of party.  Didn't work with my neighbours either as every time thought I saw a light at the end of the tunnel, it turned out to be the light of an oncoming train. 


See what the council man has to say if they come around and don't forget to offer him a drink (barley wine for instance) or two, it usually works with most council people and ask him if he is going to call on his uncle next door before going back to the office ... yes it's often their mate/relative in the council behind these letters, seldom the poor honest council tax payer like what we are 


Still, hopefully to add some cheer, I made a list of people that annoy me while whiling the time away at the Cammell Laird Social Club. 


Bus drivers who don’t wait for people to sit down before pulling away from the bus stop;


Taxi drivers who use their horns instead of knocking on the door;


People who moan at the council about the streets being full of litter, not stopping to think that it is people who drop litter, not the council;


A room full of drama teachers listening to Coldplay;


Grown men with replica shirts worn over their jumpers, who stand up and stretch out their arms when the opposing team fail to hit the target;


An assortment of scriptwriters, novelists and playwrights who own Agas but don’t know how to use them;


A musical equipment reviewer responsible for an article titled “Microphone of the Month”;


A woman who described herself as “A little bit Bridget, a little bit Ally, a little bit Sex And The City” and chose to call her baby boy Fred as a childishly rebellious attempt at a clever reaction to those who might have expected her to call him Julian or Rupert. Bit of advice: call him Rupert, it fits, and besides it’s a good name. Don’t be calling him Fred or Archie, with all its cheeky but lovable working class scamp connotations, unless you really do have plans for him to spend his life in William Hill’s waiting for them to weigh in at Newton Abbot.


A whole wall full of teenagers spitting needlessly;


An amateur thug in camouflage trousers whose Japanese fighting dog had run amok on a Swindon council estate;


A man from the record company who said that George Michael continues to challenge social taboos through his music;


Phil Collins;


Continuity announcers introducing comedy shows;


A pub band who get uppity when everyone goes to the bar during a song they’ve written themselves;


A group of football fans referred to as Commodores, as in once, twice, three times a season, who feed sugar lumps to police horses at Cup Finals;


An artist who said his next album would be more “song-based”;


A man who informs people that he gets up at six am every morning and seemed to want a medal;


People who say they speak as they find and are somehow proud of it;


Journalists who try to spell an interviewee’s laugh;


An organisation who declared an awareness week for awareness weeks;


And a council worker who dropped litter.


Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Mick P

Gale 401

 

Sorry but you are plain bloody selfish.

 

Anyone who plays music loud enough to annoy a neighbour is creating audio pollution and you are a social misfit.   You should have more consideration for your community and your music may not be to everyone elses taste and could be driving them mad. 

 

People like you should have their kit smashed up with a hammer by the local environmental officer and a bill sent to you for his time.

 

If you want to play your music loud, either buy a detached house or live out in the sticks.

 

There is no excuse, I repeat no excuse for playing music so loud that other people can hear it, no matter what time of day. Old people may be ill, young mothers may be trying to get a baby asleep, and someone who plays loud music is just inconsiderate.

 

Regards

 

Mick

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by pjl2

Without taking sides I have to say that I am amazed by the number of replies that simply support Stu without question. In other words many people here seem to be saying "It's fine to play your music as loud as you like and if the neighbours don't like it then that's their hard luck and they should move".

 

I have no idea how loudly Stu plays his music and therefore no idea if his neighbours complaint is reasonable or not. But I have to say that I certainly would not be happy if my neighbours regularly played live amplified music or live drums. If a live band were playnig next door then if it were a one-off isolated event then I would tolerate it, but if it was in the context of long-standing similar noise levels then I would feel entirely justified in strongly complaining.

 

Keep things in perspective and be sensible. One cannot expect one's neighbours to tolerate loud music just because it suits oneself. This would be an extremely selfish and anti-social attitude and would deserve complaining against vehemently.

 

Peter 

 

 

 

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by osprey
I find it hard to believe that Stu would have changed his listening habits recently. If there has been only one incident before in almost thirty years that speaks to itself. So to me it seems that the newcomers are a bit of a narrow-minded side of persons if they find something to complain about their new neighbor just after a couple of months (and furthermore make it official right away instead popping in and discuss their reasons first). And for the record I do not support the idea that loud music must or should be tolerated at all times but occasionally and at an appropriate time of the day it should be allowed.
Posted on: 08 July 2012 by pjl2

I agree that a much better approach would have been for the neighbours to have popped in for a chat to try to work out an amicable solution before going down the official route. That is always the best way to start. But the fact that they didn't do that does not affect the validity of their complaint one way or the other.

 

Nobody here can say whether the neighbours complaint is justified or not. That is why I find it so puzzling that there is such an uprising of support for Stu and such a condemnation of the neighbours. Without meaning any offence to Stu, who's to say that the complaint is not entirely justified? Had this post appeared on some kind of local neighbourhood forum rather than a hi-fi forum I think the reaction may have been rather different.

 

Just an observation: Stu talks of jamming sessions and Marshall amps over the years with volume levels turned up to the max. "You could here it half a mile away". Had the law round once. Having a live band round to play. These do not sound to me like the actions of a considerate neighbour - sorry Stu but going by your own admissions you sound like the neighbour from hell! If you consider it acceptable to subject your neighbours to this, and you obviously do, then I wonder what you consider to be an acceptable level of noise pollution from your hi-fi?

 

It sounds to me like it could well be a case of someone making a hell of a noise over the years and having become accustomed to being able to get away with it for whatever reason. Now the situation has changed with the arrival of new neighbours who object to being subjected to that noise. An unfortunate turn of events for all concerned. But these neighbours have the same rights as everyone else, even if they have only been there for five minutes.

 

Peter

 

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Donuk

Yes, perhaps I am guilty of a "semi amusing response encouraging an antagonistic approach".  Irresponsible of me I know, because Stu might believe what I am saying and do something silly.

 

I have had noisy neighbours in the past, and so have my neighbours.  In fact I have just come back from doing an open air jazz gig for a street party in York, and must have annoyed dozens of their neighbours.

 

Now I notice people are trying to blame Stu, probably tongue in cheek.

 

Where is the fun and friendship going out of this forum?  Getting like the letters page of the Daily Mail. ( I presume they have one?  Or is it a text message page??)

 

Don sunny downtown York

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by pjl2

Don,

 

I don't think it's a question of trying to blame Stu at all. None of us know the real truth of the situation, we only know what Stu has told us. He posted on here with his views about his situation and has received some support and some criticism. Not a question of not being friendly at all, unless all you want from your friends is blind slavish agreement with every view that you express. Personally I would much rather my friends told me the truth about what they think, even if I might find it annoying or unpalatable. 

 

Peter

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Jonn

Without knowing the circumstances it's difficult to to determine where the blame lies, but Peter's response seems reasonable.

What I do find odd is the reference that the new neighbours may be gay. What's that got to do with complaining about noise levels? Just another example of Stu's unreconstructed world view I guess.

Posted on: 08 July 2012 by Guido Fawkes

Knowing Stu, he is not one to play music at excessive volumes so I am more than surprised that two newcomers want to be behave in such a way: instead of talk to him, no they snitch to the council (just like in that film Brazil or was it Brave New World or 1984 or Logan's Run).

 

They came for the palmists, but I wasn’t a palmist so I did nothing
They came for the bungee jumpers, but I wasn’t a bungee jumper so I did nothing
They came for the reflexologists, but I wasn’t a reflexologist so I did nothing
They came for the formula one drivers, but I wasn’t a formula one driver so I did nothing
They came for the martial arts enthusiasts, but I wasn’t a martial arts enthusiast so I did nothing
They came for Eamonn Holmes and I think I’m right in saying I applauded
They came for the fire-eaters, but I wasn’t a fire-eater so I did nothing
They came for the Music Lovers, and I said he’s over there, behind the wardrobe


We are not a million miles away from how fascist dictatorships start

Sometimes you got to fight for your right to party, I know Mick P would agree with me, as he is quite liberal in his views and it is great to see him posting again ... much kudos to you and your moderate left of centre views, MP, but turn your wireless down a bit please mate.  


Anyway here is song you can play to them 


Posted on: 09 July 2012 by Gale 401

Panic over.

The letter had to the occupier but not my number on it.

The postman has put it through the wrong door.

Its meant for some one quarter of a mile down the road.

The Status Quo is back.

Stu.

Posted on: 09 July 2012 by Elbow
Originally Posted by Gale 401:

Panic over.

The letter had to the occupier but not my number on it.

The postman has put it through the wrong door.

Its meant for some one quarter of a mile down the road.

The Status Quo is back.

Stu.

No wonder they complained if you're listening to the Quo