Watermelons. Red and Yellow. Blind testing

Posted by: MangoMonkey on 13 July 2012

Yesterday, I had a yellow watermelon.

A very uncanny experience.

Eyes closed: couldn't tell it apart from a red watermelon.

Eyes opened: It didn't feel like I was eating a watermelon.

 

What does that tell me about level matched blind hearing tests? Not sure.

Posted on: 13 July 2012 by Massimo Bertola

I've read somewhere, once, that under certain conditions and blindfold, a number of professional sommeliers couldn't tell a white from a red wine.

 

It was probably on Stereophile, so it's easy to see why the thing came about...

Posted on: 14 July 2012 by naim_nymph

MM,

 

i thought you eat mangos

 

Debs

Posted on: 14 July 2012 by Bart
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

Yesterday, I had a yellow watermelon.

A very uncanny experience.

Eyes closed: couldn't tell it apart from a red watermelon.

Eyes opened: It didn't feel like I was eating a watermelon.

 

What does that tell me about level matched blind hearing tests? Not sure.

To state the obvious, what it says about unblinded comparisons, such as when we power down our system and then add a Powerline, etc. etc., is at least as interesting.

Posted on: 14 July 2012 by osprey
If it not red it is not water melon. It might taste good but still…
Posted on: 14 July 2012 by Harry Bennett
Originally Posted by Bart:

       

         class="quotedText">
       
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

Yesterday, I had a yellow watermelon.

A very uncanny experience.

Eyes closed: couldn't tell it apart from a red watermelon.

Eyes opened: It didn't feel like I was eating a watermelon.

 

What does that tell me about level matched blind hearing tests? Not sure.

To state the obvious, what it says about unblinded comparisons, such as when we power down our system and then add a Powerline, etc. etc., is at least as interesting.




watched a show on NAT GEO or like channel on how what we see effects other senses.

In one scene a person is shown repeating one word, the actual audio heard at this point was another similar sounding word, for example person is seen saying "mind" but the word "mend" is actually what is being broadcast, but our sense of vision wins out and generally our mind hears the word "mind".
Posted on: 14 July 2012 by MangoMonkey
Originally Posted by osprey:
If it not red it is not water melon. It might taste good but still…


They're actually sweeter. Same texture, just the color that's different.

Posted on: 15 July 2012 by joerand

I find that yellow tomatoes are much sweeter than red tomatoes.  Most red tomatoes cultured in the US have been genetically altered so as not to fully ripen in order to reduce spoilage and allow for mechanical harvesting within a specific time period.  This alteration in ripening has lead to a reduction in the sugar production and flavor of red tomatoes.  I think most tasters would prefer the taste and texture of a ripe yellow in a blind test.

 

Are watermelons undergoing the same fate?

Posted on: 15 July 2012 by rich46

grow a british tom called called gardens delight when ripe will wipe the floor will ANY

Posted on: 15 July 2012 by MangoMonkey

@Joerand: hierloom tomatoes, you mean?

@rich46: Let's see if I can get some seeds next time I'm over in England.

Posted on: 15 July 2012 by Gale 401
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

Yesterday, I had a yellow watermelon.

A very uncanny experience.

Eyes closed: couldn't tell it apart from a red watermelon.

Eyes opened: 

 

What does that tell me about level matched blind hearing tests? Not sure.

You are blind testing the wrong melons man.

Posted on: 27 July 2012 by joerand
Originally Posted by MangoMonkey:

@Joerand: hierloom tomatoes, you mean?

I was referring to yellow tomatoes, but you're right, heirlooms have not been genetically altered.  They are like tomatoes were years ago; they'll ripen fully or unevenly, and will rot.  But they are higher in sugar and flavor.  That's why the few heirlooms you see in stores are so costly.  Remember, tomatoes should not be stored in the refrigerator .

Posted on: 31 July 2012 by rodwsmith
Originally Posted by maxbertola:

I've read somewhere, once, that under certain conditions and blindfold, a number of professional sommeliers couldn't tell a white from a red wine.

 

It was probably on Stereophile, so it's easy to see why the thing came about...

This is a bit of a myth. It was a valid experiment that showed that some people (not professionals, although volunteers) when given a white wine dyed red started to use 'red wine' descriptions like redcurrant, blackcurrant etc, and not words associated with green or yellow fruit. No-one was blindfold.

 

As flavours don't, of themselves, have a colour, this is really not the same as 'couldn't tell white from red'. Some white wines are in fact made from black grapes.

 

Needless to say, the "couldn't tell white from red" angle - which is just about a legitimate interpretation, albeit a very misleading one - was the way in which a number of newspaper chose to write up what was otherwise a rather boring scientific paper (I read it), even though the results were interesting, but unsurprising. 

 

Of course a white wine dyed red does in fact become a red wine, just one where the colour has not come from grape skins, but dye.

 

We do indeed 'taste with our eyes' which is why it takes such a long time to first enjoy refried beans - If you've ever fed a cat anyway.