MTB - 26" v 29"??
Posted by: Jonathan Gorse on 29 July 2012
I'm in the process of building up an MTB and would value some advice on the wheel size debate. I currently have a 12 year old Scott Boulder hardtail and have never liked the ride compared to my 531 steel tourer. I'm keen to find an MTB that has all the zing I get from riding my tourer and that hopefully will last for years and years (I tend to keep bikes a long time - the tourer is 27 years old!!)
I ride lots of bridleways and forests in the South Downs area as well as National trails like the South Downs Way, Downs Link etc. I don't do drops, jumps or other types of extreme riding and I'm too old to start now (43). I'm tall (nearly 6ft 2) but heavy (lets just be flattering and say rugby player build!) which is why I'm keen to get out on the bike more and get fit/lose weight!
I have no experience with full suspension bikes and a budget of around £2k but can't help feeling that even though that budget might buy a decent one - it might still bob around all over the place under my ample proportions, they will be heavier and they somehow don't appeal quite so much to the purist in me. As a result the frontrunner choices are Cotic Soul or Solaris. The Soul is 26" all main tubes made of Reynolds 853 while the Solaris is a 29" hardtail frame with a bit of 853 and something called True Temper tubing.
I know there are some keen MTB'ers on here and would value their views on 26 v 29 and hardtail v full sus bearing in mind the kind of riding I do.
Over to the experts!
Jonathan.