Danny Baker's Great Album Showdown on BBC4

Posted by: J.N. on 06 February 2013

Anyone else catch yesterday's first episode on 'Rock'? Fascinating vinyl album discussion, information and trivia for us devotees of the 12 inch plastic platter from an interesting and well informed collection of studio guests.

 

Two more episodes to go - and it's on BBC HD later in the evening too.

 

For once I was able to listen to Jeremy Clarkson without feeling nauseous or shouting obscenities at the screen. The man has a decent taste in music.

 

John.

Posted on: 06 February 2013 by Steve J

I forgot it was on John. I'll try and catch it on iPlayer. I was busy last night with a guest from Leicester (not Richard III) who fitted a new cart for me.

 

ATB

 

Steve

Posted on: 07 February 2013 by Guido Fawkes

The first programme was interesting, the second less so and the third even less so. Probably because i like rock music more than pop music and pop music more than r&b/disco. Danny Baker is excellent as the host ... some of the guests i find less engrossing ... 

 

Still always good to see discussions about music on the TV rather than soap operas, game shows and endless dramas

 

One curious thing i noticed is the way people select there favourite songs .... Quite a few choose something that reminds them of where they were, what they were doing and memories .... None those things influence my choice: i just think is this a great song that i like and there is no personal experience involved ... I mean i've only lived on earth and i never seen the sun or the promise of thousand other suns that lie beyond here, but i still appreciate groups like the Jefferson Airplane more than somebody rapping about life in a run down suburb. 

 

On this programme concept albums are about a political theme, whereas for me a great concept album is about a Alchemist, a Snow Goose or S.F.Sorrow (the greatest concept album ever imho). So what i find interesting is the way people view what is a good album very differently from me. Whereas i was in tune with the rock guest, i was not in tune with the subsequent guests. Perhaps it is my stance that songs are for listening to and even singing along to, but dance no thanks. 

Posted on: 08 February 2013 by Gavin B

I've watched Episodes 1 & 3 so far.

 

I think I've enjoyed them, but at times they have been annoying.  They've also been a little too stuck in the past.  It's certainly valid to talk about golden ages for different genres, but all of them are still producing excellent albums (on vinyl, seeing as that was the premise for the show).

 

I think the choice of guests has been a little odd.  The young journalist (on the rock show) had a couple of interesting things to say, but I don't believe she can have had the same passion because she didn't grow up in the vinyl era.  Martin Freeman was worthwhile but I don't think he fitted with the other two guests - he'd have been interesting on a general album show because there seemed to be hints he had a much wider collection / taste.  Mica Paris was just a bit annoying.

 

The third show did prompt me to pull Stevie Wonder's Innervisions from the shelf though (albeit on CD).

Posted on: 08 February 2013 by maze

Last nights show, bloody fantastic.

Posted on: 09 February 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by maze:

Last nights show, bloody fantastic.

Agree Maze and kudos to Martin Freeman for sticking a Donny Hathaway LP on "The Wall of Sound".

Posted on: 09 February 2013 by Guido Fawkes

Now you've got me wondering who is Donny Hathaway ... I guess i'm going to have to have a listen. 

Posted on: 09 February 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by Guido Fawkes:

Now you've got me wondering who is Donny Hathaway ... I guess i'm going to have to have a listen. 

He is one of the giants of soul Guy. Superb Fender Rhodes player, great jazzy chops, brilliant songwriter (and also interpreter of other people's songs) and a voice to die for. Sadly committed suicide in 1979.

 

This album is the best place to start:

 

 

But these are also worth a listen:

 

 

 

Posted on: 10 February 2013 by Guido Fawkes

Thanks .. I've ordered the first of these .. Liked the bits i found on youTube. 

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
I quite like Danny Baker but I thought this was awful. Let a few talking heads waffle on for a few minutes before I move to my next set piece that is as subtle as a sledgehammer and fairly inaccurate to boot. So, Danny reckons we all played albums all the way through!!! I don't think so. We all sat there smelling the vinyl. Well I can tell you what it smelt like but I can't say it was something I went out of my way to do so. If you like vinyl I have no problem with that but I do find this over romanticising of it nauseating. It's a re-inventing of history. Many of us loved vinyl but didn't really sit there mourning the loss of cover art etc. Rather, we enjoyed the convenience of cd and the massive range of reissues witch finally gave us access to music as could only dream about in a vinyl world. In Danny World the cd killed vinyl. In the real world it was cassette and the will of the majority. Man's an over-indulged oaf.
Posted on: 11 February 2013 by BigH47

What a miserable world you live in Mike.

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Kevin-W
Originally Posted by BigH47:

What a miserable world you live in Mike.

+1

 

Lots of us DO mourn the loss of cover art, though Mike, and many feel that the convenience of CD is a poor trade-off compared to the strengths of vinyl.

 

I know plenty of people who rushed out to adopt CD, dumping record players and vinyl records in the process and who now regret it.

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
Not at all Howard. I love music and I have my personal preferences for listening to it. I don't begrudge others their means either. I simply object to wholesale revisionism that has it's basic facts wrong and celebrates the wrong thing. Personally I live and breathe music and I'm not stuck in any specific era or tied to and specific means of reproduction. I'm also not averse to celebrating any aspect of any of it however obtuse. This little series struck me as being a vanity project for someone who does little but celebrate the ephemera and in doing so consistently gets his facts wrong and expects us to take his word on stuff that there's no evidence for. It's periodically entertaining but mostly bollocks. I'm sure a small proportion of people in the 70s really did sit and listen to albums all the way thorough. I very much doubt there's any association with it being because of vinyl. Similarly, the smell of vinyl is very distinctive and I also regret the loss of impactful cover art . However, we've been there and done that about 30 years ago. Time moves on and I'd rather get on with listening to music than re-heat stuff of tenuous relevance. There is a great series to be made about this subject but as yet no-one has come forward with sufficient objectivity to pull it off. The best effort I've seen so far was the Milner book, "Perfecting Sound Forever" but that fell down badly when he declared his bias toward vinyl despite the fact he'd seen software analysis showing what mech noise did etc. and then lapsing into a Bakeresque eulogy about the smell etc. Yawn.
Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
Kevin, I mourn the cover art; the smell and so on. Then I got on with listening to music. The harsh fact is that those who feel that cd was a poor trade off are in the overwhelming minority . The history of hi-fidelity is one of convenience and portability winning out over sound quality every time. However, with vinyl there is the additional argument that the sound quality thing to vinyl fans is a clear cut thing. To the rest of us it's a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy and nowhere hear clear cut. Nobody is about to change anyone's mind. On that. None of that takes away from the fact it was a piss poor programme; badly spliced together from some half cocked ideas and inaccurate facts. It was entertaining... but not actually any good.
Posted on: 11 February 2013 by BigH47

Re-writing history is indelibly linked to the music industry. Whence the Beatles invented everything even stuff before/after they were formed.

 

I'm not a particular DB fan, but there are many worse IMO.

 

BTW 99.9% of the time I play albums all the way through, (excluding samplers, B ofs). 

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
Just because something is "indelibly linked"does not make it good or right. Personally an album always gets my full attention until such time I've identified weaker tracks etc. That process remains the same regardless of format. I would happily play a single track off an LP if that was worth listening to and yet I'm more content to listen all the way through despite the alleged convenience when listening to cd.
Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Wugged Woy
Originally Posted by Mike Hughes:
Kevin, I mourn the cover art; the smell and so on. Then I got on with listening to music. The harsh fact is that those who feel that cd was a poor trade off are in the overwhelming minority . The history of hi-fidelity is one of convenience and portability winning out over sound quality every time. However, with vinyl there is the additional argument that the sound quality thing to vinyl fans is a clear cut thing. To the rest of us it's a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy and nowhere near clear cut.

Mike, I'm in total agreement. Although I never smelt my vinyl (did I miss out on some spaced-out experience?).

When I moved from vinyl to CD (probably at the time everyone else had 'converted), I didn't just sit there bemoaning the loss of beautiful vinyl sound. It was very much a swings and roundabouts affair - the lack of clicks and pops on classical music CD's, for example, was an absolute relief for me. Of course, I am only talking about my personal experience and feelings. 

As you say, I think we should stop romanticising vinyl,  and remember it's faults aswell as it's virtues.

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Guido Fawkes
Originally Posted by Mike Hughes:
... those who feel that cd was a poor trade off are in the overwhelming minority . 

And what's wrong with that I'd like to know so here I go again .... I prefer vinyl to CD because it sounds better to me and you can't get any music by the Desperate Bicycles on CD ... Though i was disappointed Danny didn't mention the DB's New Cross, New Cross (so good they said it twice) ... Him supporting the lions and all. Moreover, Danny shares the same initials as the Bicycles. 

 

Still it'll be good to see my local giants assume a place in the football league ... Yes FGR are on the way to the top.

 

Perhaps, Danny ignored NC, NC because strictly it was an EP rather than LP so perhaps another series is order ... 

 

If we don't rewrite history then what is good for, absolutely nothing, say it again ....

 

i thought it made a change from the usual rockumentary on TDSOTM ... Why is it they never do Jethro Tull ... they could call it Living In The Past and we'd all be happy. 

 

Anyway, i wouldn't worry about the facts, better to be happy than right ...

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Guido Fawkes
Originally Posted by BigH47:

Re-writing history is indelibly linked to the music industry. Whence the Beatles invented everything even stuff before/after they were formed.

 

I'm not a particular DB fan, but there are many worse IMO.

 

BTW 99.9% of the time I play albums all the way through, (excluding samplers, B ofs). 

That is a fact though the Beatles did invent everything ... before the fab four there was nothing, a void, a chasm, just an an empty shell, a vacuum or was that the Rutles. 

 

I nearly always play albums all the way through .... 

 

By the way, didn't know you were not a particular fan of the Desperate Bicycles ... Do you like the Flying Lizards? They did a great version of the Beatles "Money"

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by maze
Originally Posted by Guido Fawkes:
Originally Posted by BigH47:

Re-writing history is indelibly linked to the music industry. Whence the Beatles invented everything even stuff before/after they were formed.

 

I'm not a particular DB fan, but there are many worse IMO.

 

BTW 99.9% of the time I play albums all the way through, (excluding samplers, B ofs). 

That is a fact though the Beatles did invent everything ... before the fab four there was nothing, a void, a chasm, just an an empty shell, a vacuum or was that the Rutles. 

 

I nearly always play albums all the way through .... 

 

By the way, didn't know you were not a particular fan of the Desperate Bicycles ... Do you like the Flying Lizards? They did a great version of the Beatles "Money"

Erm that would be Barretts Strongs money, the Beatles covered it.

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
Extra "s" added to the Barratt there. Re-inventing history. Tsk
Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Ron Brinsdon

I want a coffee table like Danny's

 

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Quad 33
Originally Posted by Ron Brinsdon:

I want a coffee table like Danny's

 

WHY?

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Mike Hughes
Well quite!
Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Ron Brinsdon

Because, unless it was a Bathams Bitter induced hallucination, it was black, round and had a "label" at the centre - a 48" album.

 

Did I imagine it?

Posted on: 11 February 2013 by Quad 33

It would be great.........

 

If you lived with your mum, spent all your time in your bed room and wanted it to match your Blondie posters! .

 

Graham.